RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2511-4599
Hospital Costs of Intracranial Haemorrhage in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Possible Implications for Emerging Therapies

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening event,[1] with increasing incidence over the past decades.[2] [3] Treatment of acute PE is currently undergoing profound change, and novel reperfusion treatment modalities rapidly entering the market need to show, among others, whether they can reduce the complications associated with systemic fibrinolysis and thus justify their elevated costs.[4] [5] [6] In this regard, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) is in the focus of interest,[7] [8] [9] since it is associated with a high early case fatality and seriously impacts the patients' well-being and quality of life over the long term. We therefore examined the impact of ICH on reimbursed hospital costs (reflecting the payer's perspective) in patients with acute PE, and dissected the main cost drivers. Data from all patients hospitalized in Germany (with the exception of a very small minority admitted to military hospitals and psychiatric centres) with a main diagnosis of PE (ICD-10 code I26) during the period 2016–2020 (source: RDC of the Federal Statistical Office and the Statistical Offices of the Federal States, DRG Statistics 2016–2020; own calculations) were analyzed as previously described.[3] [10] [11] We stratified patients by the occurrence of ICH, identified by at least one of the following ICD-10 codes: I60, I61, I62, G95.10, S06.33, S06.5, S06.6. We analyzed all procedure codes related to the treatment of ICH, including surgical, endoscopic, or interventional drainage of intracranial haematomas (5-012.0, 5-012.2, 5-013.1, 5-013.4, 5-014.1, 5-022.0, 5-022.00, 5-022.01, 5-022.02, 5-022.0x, 5-022.20, 5-022.y, 5-033.2, 5-034.1, 5-034.4, 5-038.0, 8-020.d, and/or 8-151.1). Finally, we included multidisciplinary treatment in specialized facilities, coded as 8-981 or 8-98b.[12] [13] The statistical software SPSS® for Windows, Version 20.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used for data analysis.
Overall, 283,280 patients (median age 71.0 [IQR 58.0–80.0] years; 51.4% women) were hospitalized in Germany due to acute PE in the above period. Median length of hospital stay was 7.0 (4.0–10.0) days; ICH was coded in 946 (0.3%) patients. More specifically, ICH occurred in 1.9% of the patients (n = 12,907) who received systemic thrombolysis; 3.1% of those underwent surgical embolectomy and 6.1% of the patients treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). PE patients suffering from ICH were older (74.0 [63.0–81.0] vs. 71.0 [58.0–80.0] years; P < 0.001) and slightly more frequently male (51.8%, vs. 48.5% of those without ICH; P = 0.046). ICH was associated with longer in-hospital stay (10.0 [3.0–17.0] vs. 7.0 [4.0–10.0] days; P < 0.001), more frequent admission to an intensive care unit (ICU; 47.8% vs. 12.7%; P < 0.001), and higher in-hospital case fatality (36.6% vs. 8.0%; P < 0.001).
The costs of hospitalization with PE complicated by ICH were approximately 2.8-fold higher than in its absence (mean: 10,805 ± 18,282 vs. 3,917 ± 4,952 euros; P < 0.001). Mean costs were highest in the year 2016 (13,062 ± 23,536 euros), decreasing progressively until 2020 (8,232 ± 13,598 euros). This trend was likely driven by adaptations in the hospital reimbursement system and possibly by more effective prevention of complications, notably pneumonia.[12] Moreover, the drop in costs during the first pandemic year 2020 probably resulted from a combination of medical and social factors as discussed previously.[10]
Reimbursed hospitalization costs of PE with ICH varied with the patients' age: peak mean costs were detected in the second (37,685 ± 36,455 euros) and fifth (24,092.4 ± 33,639.6 euros) decades of life. Interestingly, PE patients ≤72 years had higher treatment costs than those 73 years or older (15,178 ± 23,396 and 7209 ± 11,444 euros, respectively; P < 0.001). This finding, supporting the results of a recent systematic review,[14] is likely due to (i) a higher early case fatality in older patients and (ii) more intensive diagnostic efforts and treatment escalation (for both PE and ICH) in younger patients.
[Table 1] displays the main hospitalization cost drivers in patients with PE and ICH; the cut-off of 10,000 euros was chosen based on the fact that it best defines the reimbursement of intermediate- or high-risk PE receiving advanced treatment in the German DRG-based system.[15] Similar to what has been described for intracranial bleeding in the overall population,[10] [16] [17] [18] comorbidity burden reflected by the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) significantly contributed to hospitalization costs (CCI ≤3: 9,850 ± 16,169; CCI >3: 10,999 ± 18,684 euros; P = 0.041). Additionally, mean costs of PE complicated by ICH were higher in hospitals serving rural (11,313 ± 18,594 euros) compared to those in urban (10,555 ± 21,956 euros) and suburban (10,107 ± 14,664 euros) areas (P < 0.001). Our results thus differ from those of US studies reporting that urban and teaching hospitals generated the highest costs in the treatment of haemorrhagic stroke[14]; a possible explanation may be the longer hospital stay in rural hospitals and the more frequent drainage of intracranial haematomas in suburban hospitals in Germany (4.3%, compared to 3.2% in rural and 3.1% in city hospitals).
Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; PE, pulmonary embolism; RV, right ventricle/ventricular; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
Note: The term ‘complex medical treatment’ denotes treatment in a multidisciplinary stroke unit. P values lower than 0.05 (two-sided) were considered to be statistically significant and are set in bold.
In our study, the impact of ICH on the hospitalization costs for PE was smaller than might be expected; this can be explained, at least in part, by the high early case fatality of PE complicated by ICH. In addition, considering the low overall incidence of ICH in PE (0.3%), the added hospitalization costs imposed by this complication might appear rather moderate in the German healthcare system. However, this estimate is only a part of the entire picture due to (i) the substantial burden imposed by premature loss of life on the deceased patient's family and the society, and (ii) the fact that survivors of PE complicated by ICH continue to suffer from a broad range of symptoms often causing severe chronic disability and recurrent hospitalizations in addition to indirect costs.[19] [20] [21] Haemorrhagic stroke has been associated with a high disease burden as measured by disability-adjusted life-years,[22] and the economic burden of stroke due to loss of productivity was estimated at 12 billion euros in European countries in the year 2017.[23] In the present study, it was not possible to analyze the post-discharge costs of PE complicated by ICH, since these are not linked to the German nationwide hospitalized population. A further potential limitation is that our results are based on ICD-10 and procedure codes; underreporting (or overreporting) of cases or treatments cannot be excluded.[24] [25] [26] Nevertheless, the coding performed by German hospitals undergoes regular quality controls to ensure correct and transparent reimbursement.
The present analysis highlights the (socio-)economic impact of ICH associated with acute PE in a national healthcare system. Our results may prove helpful for evaluating, apart from the clinical benefits, the potential cost savings of new interventional modalities for the treatment of acute PE. If ongoing randomized trials confirm the potential of these procedures to lower, among others, the risk of life-threatening or incapacitating ICH, the emerging technological advances in reperfusion treatment may help to reduce the overall disease burden of PE, in the acute phase and over the long term.
Authors' Contribution
K.C.C., K.M., S.K., and K.K. were responsible for the conception of the study, K.K. and L.H. for acquisition and analysis of the data. All authors were responsible for interpretation of the data. K.C.C., S.K., and K.K. drafted the article, and all authors revised it critically for intellectual content.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 11. Oktober 2024
Angenommen: 06. Januar 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
08. Januar 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. Januar 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C. et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 2020; 41 (04) 543-603
- 2 Bikdeli B, Wang Y, Jimenez D. et al. Pulmonary embolism hospitalization, readmission, and mortality rates in US older adults, 1999-2015. JAMA 2019; 322 (06) 574-576
- 3 Keller K, Hobohm L, Ebner M. et al. Trends in thrombolytic treatment and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism in Germany. Eur Heart J 2020; 41 (04) 522-529
- 4 Mohr K, Keeling B, Kaier K. et al. Modelling costs of interventional pulmonary embolism treatment: implications of US trends for a European healthcare system. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2024; 13 (06) 501-505
- 5 Götzinger F, Lauder L, Sharp ASP. et al. Interventional therapies for pulmonary embolism. Nat Rev Cardiol 2023; 20 (10) 670-684
- 6 Mavromanoli AC, Jiménez D, Sanchez O. et al. Major in-hospital bleeding in patients with pulmonary embolism treated with systemic thrombolysis. Thromb Res 2023; 231: 29-31
- 7 Christodoulou KC, Mohr K, Uphaus T. et al. Evolving patterns of intracranial hemorrhage in advanced therapies in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res 2024; 243: 109168
- 8 Chatterjee S, Weinberg I, Yeh RW. et al. Risk factors for intracranial haemorrhage in patients with pulmonary embolism treated with thrombolytic therapy development of the PE-CH score. Thromb Haemost 2017; 117 (02) 246-251
- 9 Zhang RS, Maqsood MH, Sharp ASP. et al. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation, catheter-directed thrombolysis, or systemic thrombolysis in acute pulmonary embolism. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16 (21) 2644-2651
- 10 Mohr K, Hobohm L, Kaier K. et al. Drivers and recent trends of hospitalisation costs related to acute pulmonary embolism. Clin Res Cardiol 2024; Epub ahead of print
- 11 Keller K, Schmitt VH, Hahad O. et al. Categorization of patients with pulmonary embolism by Charlson Comorbidity Index. Am J Med 2024; 137 (08) 727-735
- 12 Neumann-Haefelin T, Bartig D, Faiss J, Schwab S, Nabavi D. The acute care of stroke patients in German stroke units—an analysis of DRG data from 2021 and 2022. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2024; 121 (06) 200-201
- 13 Grond M, Busse O. Neurologische Komplexbehandlung des akuten Schlaganfalls auf der Stroke Unit. Der Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel 8–981. Aktuelle Neurol 2017; 44: 15-18
- 14 Thomas SM, Reindorp Y, Christophe BR, Connolly Jr ES. Systematic review of resource use and costs in the hospital management of intracerebral hemorrhage. World Neurosurg 2022; 164: 41-63
- 15 DRG-Research-Group. Wegbrouper G-DRG 2024. Accessed at: https://www.drg-research-group.de/index.php?option=com_webgrouper&Itemid=112&view=webgrouper
- 16 Fanikos J, Rao A, Seger AC, Carter D, Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ. Hospital costs of acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2013; 126 (02) 127-132
- 17 Farmakis IT, Barco S, Mavromanoli AC. et al. Cost-of-illness analysis of long-term health care resource use and disease burden in patients with pulmonary embolism: insights from the PREFER in VTE registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11 (20) e027514
- 18 Specogna AV, Patten SB, Turin TC, Hill MD. Cost of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in Canada during 1 decade. Stroke 2014; 45 (01) 284-286
- 19 Tennant A, Geddes JM, Fear J, Hillman M, Chamberlain MA. Outcome following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1997; 19 (07) 278-284
- 20 Cadilhac DA, Dewey HM, Vos T, Carter R, Thrift AG. The health loss from ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage: evidence from the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010; 8: 49
- 21 Woo D, Comeau ME, Venema SU. et al. Risk factors associated with mortality and neurologic disability after intracerebral hemorrhage in a racially and ethnically diverse cohort. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5 (03) e221103
- 22 Haupenthal D, Kuramatsu JB, Volbers B. et al. Disability-adjusted life-years associated with intracerebral hemorrhage and secondary injury. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (07) e2115859
- 23 Luengo-Fernandez R, Violato M, Candio P, Leal J. Economic burden of stroke across Europe: a population-based cost analysis. Eur Stroke J 2020; 5 (01) 17-25
- 24 Khanna RR, Kim SB, Jenkins I. et al. Predictive value of the present-on-admission indicator for hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism. Med Care 2015; 53 (04) e31-e36
- 25 Khanna R, Maynard G, Sadeghi B. et al. Incidence of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolic codes in medical patients hospitalized in academic medical centers. J Hosp Med 2014; 9 (04) 221-225
- 26 Verelst S, Jacques J, Van den Heede K. et al. Validation of hospital administrative dataset for adverse event screening. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (05) e25