Are YouTube Videos Useful in Robot-assisted Segmentectomy Education?

Abstract

Background Segmentectomy operation became a preferable operation for small lesions due to the importance of saving lung parenchyma. Using robotic technology has too many advantages for segmentectomy operations. Web sites such as YouTube have become educational tools for surgical trainees. The aim of our study is to analyze YouTube videos for accurate and up-to-date information about robotic segmentectomy operations.

Methods The videos on www.youtube.com, which were reached on July 11, 2024, by using the keywords “robot segmentectomy” and “robotic segmentectomy lung,” were evaluated in this research. The videos were evaluated by using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) scoring system, Critical View of safety (CVS), and LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS).

Results Eighty-one videos were included. Almost half of the videos (n = 42) were affiliated with university hospitals. Preoperative imaging was seen in 49% of all videos; however, the rates were 32% and 20.9% for patients' demographics and preoperative assessment information, respectively. Only 29.6% of the videos presented the placement of trocars during the presentation.

Conclusion It has become possible to record high-quality videos easily with developing technology. However, our results showed that many of the videos do not include the parameters especially related to education. Our findings suggest that those videos are inadequate for trainees.

Keywords

LAP-VEGaS - robot - segmentectomy - youtube - critical view of safety - education

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available. Data can be obtained via mailing to the corresponding author.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 24. Oktober 2024

Angenommen: 09. Januar 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
10. Januar 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
05. Februar 2025

• References

• 1 Merritt RE. Robotic segmentectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 2023; 33 (01) 43-49
• 2 Stamatis G, Leschber G, Schwarz B. et al. Survival outcomes in a prospective randomized multicenter Phase III trial comparing patients undergoing anatomical segmentectomy versus standard lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer up to 2 cm. Lung Cancer 2022; 172: 108-116
• 3 Toker A, Ayalp K, Uyumaz E, Kaba E, Demirhan O, Erus S. Robotic lung segmentectomy for malignant and benign lesions. J Thorac Dis 2014; 6 (07) 937-942
• 4 Song G, Sun X, Miao S. et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted lobectomy of lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11 (06) 2431-2437
• 5 Balta C, Kuzucuoğlu M, Can Karacaoglu I. Evaluation of YouTube videos in video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy education. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020; 30 (11) 1223-1230
• 6 Pugh CM, Watson A, Bell Jr RH. et al. Surgical education in the internet era. J Surg Res 2009; 156 (02) 177-182
• 7 Javidan A, Vignarajah M, Nelms MW. et al. YouTube as a source of patient and trainee education in vascular surgery: a systematic review. EJVES Vasc Forum 2024; 61: 62-76
• 8 Celentano V, Smart N, McGrath J. et al. LAP-VEGaS Practice Guidelines for Reporting of Educational Videos in Laparoscopic Surgery: a joint trainers and trainees consensus statement. Ann Surg 2018; 268 (06) 920-926
• 9 Yildirim A, Saglam MS, Mola S. et al. Vascular access on YouTube: navigating the stream of information for hemodialysis patients. Turk J Vasc Surg 2024; 33: 64-70
• 10 Cerfolio RJ. Total port approach for robotic lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 2014; 24 (02) 151-156 , v
• 11 Martyn TLB, Baker JF. Assessment of the quality of information of YouTube videos regarding cervical disc replacement. Int J Spine Surg 2022; 16 (02) 272-277
• 12 Haslam RE, Seideman CA. Educational value of YouTube surgical videos of pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a qualitative assessment. J Endourol 2020; 34 (11) 1129-1133
• 13 Richardson MA, Park W, Bernstein DN, Mesfin A. Analysis of the quality, reliability, and educational content of YouTube videos concerning spine tumors. Int J Spine Surg 2022; 16 (02) 278-282
• 14 Rouhi AD, Roberson JL, Kindall E. et al. What are trainees watching? Assessing the educational quality of online laparoscopic cholecystectomy training videos using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines. Surgery 2023; 174 (03) 524-528
• 15 Coşgun T, Kaba E, Ayalp K, Toker A. An antiquated contraindication for minimally invasive lung surgery: no place to staple the bronchus. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg 2019; 27 (04) 521-525
• 16 Cosgun T, Kaba E, Ayalp K, Toker A. Successful sleeve resection as a marker for proficiency for robotic pulmonary resection. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 69 (06) 551-556
• 17 Cosgun T, Kaba E, Ayalp K. et al. Bronchial sleeve anastomosis and primary closures with the da Vinci system: an advanced minimally invasive technique. Video-assist Thorac Surg 2017; 2: 4
• 18 Perroni G, Veronesi G. Robotic segmentectomy: indication and technique. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12 (06) 3404-3410
• 19 Celentano V, Smart N, Cahill RA. et al. Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool. Surg Endosc 2021; 35 (03) 1362-1369