Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2516-4020
Original Thoracic

Role of the Goddard Score in Predicting Prolonged Air Leak in Pulmonary Segmentectomies

1   University Witten Herdecke Faculty of Health, Witten, Germany
2   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Florence-Nightingale-Krankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany
,
Lisann Rheinhold
1   University Witten Herdecke Faculty of Health, Witten, Germany
2   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Florence-Nightingale-Krankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany
,
Rachel Klamer
1   University Witten Herdecke Faculty of Health, Witten, Germany
2   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Florence-Nightingale-Krankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany
,
Ahmet Alkhatam
2   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Florence-Nightingale-Krankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany
,
Aris Koryllos
1   University Witten Herdecke Faculty of Health, Witten, Germany
2   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Florence-Nightingale-Krankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Zoom Image

Abstract

Background Prolonged air leak (PAL) is a major cause of morbidities and increased treatment costs following lung resection. The Goddard score (GS) quantifies pulmonary emphysema on computed tomography, a risk factor for PAL, from 0 to 24.

Methods We evaluated the GS as a predictor of PAL in pulmonary segmentectomies by retrospectively analyzing 131 patients with anatomical segmentectomy. We identified predictors of PAL and performed logistic regression.

Results Eighty-three percent of patients had a history of smoking. The mean air leak duration was 4.2 days; 16% had PAL (>7 days). Median GS was 1. The optimal cutoff was GS ≥ 6 (area under the curve AUC = 0.625). GS did not correlate with air leak duration. In combination, body mass index, cumulative pack-years, immunosuppression, adhesiolysis, operation time, and GS ≥ 6 best predicted PAL with AUC = 0.914. Omitting GS still leads to an AUC = 0.864.

Conclusion The GS does not add enough information to be of practical value in anatomic segmentectomies, but it is of academic significance to quantify and compare lung emphysema in the context of clinical studies.



Publication History

Received: 10 November 2024

Accepted: 13 January 2025

Article published online:
14 February 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany