PDF herunterladen
Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2522-1708
Original Article

Managing Home Oxygen and Nasogastric Feeds Post-NICU Discharge: PCP Practices and Perspectives

Lauren A. Beard
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
,
Blair W. Weikel
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
,
Kathleen E. Hannan
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
,
Amanda I. Messinger
2   Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
,
Stephanie L. Bourque 
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
› Institutsangaben Funding None.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective NICU graduates are frequently technology dependent including home oxygen, pulse oximetry, and/or nasogastric (NG) feedings. Primary care provider (PCP) perceptions, practices, and barriers to managing these infants are not well described, especially at altitude. We sought to 1) describe PCP comfort and 2) determine practices and barriers in managing this technology at higher altitudes.

Study Design This cross-sectional survey assessed Colorado and Wyoming PCP perceptions and practices surrounding technology in NICU graduates. We explored bivariate analysis between clinic altitude, location, and provider's experience with comfort caring for infants discharged with technology using chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests. Significant relationships were modeled using logistic regression for odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

Results Among 203 respondents, 82% were pediatricians, and 86% practiced in urban/suburban environments. Clinic altitude ranged 2,500–9,000 ft. PCPs endorsed comfort managing oxygen in term (92%) and moderately/late preterm infants (82%), versus 52% comfort in very/extremely preterm infants. 62% utilized an oxygen-weaning algorithm. Comfort managing oxygen was greater in suburban versus urban locations (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6–11.7) and providers practicing for >10 versus <5 years (OR = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.5, 8.4). 60% found pulse oximetry useful, though 70% perceived caregiver stress. 69% accepted infants on NG feeds, though 61% endorsed discomfort with management.

Conclusion PCPs are comfortable managing home oxygen in moderately preterm to term infants but find caring for most preterm infants challenging. Discomfort in managing NG feeds is prevalent. This highlights peridischarge barriers and improvement opportunities for high-risk, technology-dependent infants.

Key Points

  • PCPs are uncomfortable managing very/extremely preterm infants on home oxygen after NICU discharge.

  • PCPs perceive frequent commercial pulse oximetry use in NICU graduates.

  • Most PCPs are uncomfortable managing home NG feedings.

Keywords

neonatology - NICU discharge - home oxygen therapy - feeding difficulties - home pulse oximetry

Authors' Contributions

L.A.B. conceptualized and designed the study, recruited participants, led data collection, analysis, and interpretation, drafted the initial manuscript, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript. B.W.W. provided data analysis design and execution, led data collection, analysis, and interpretation, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript. K.E.H. provided feedback on the study design, participated in data collection, analysis, and interpretation, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript. A.I.M. provided feedback on the study design, participated in data interpretation, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript. S.L.B. conceptualized and designed the study, recruited participants, participated in data collection, analysis, and interpretation, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript.


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 21. November 2024

Angenommen: 21. Januar 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
24. Januar 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. Februar 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Patel RM, Kandefer S, Walsh MC. et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Causes and timing of death in extremely premature infants from 2000 through 2011. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (04) 331-340
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF. et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates, 1993-2012. JAMA 2015; 314 (10) 1039-1051
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Kuo DZ, Lyle RE, Casey PH, Stille CJ. Care system redesign for preterm children after discharge from the NICU. Pediatrics 2017; 139 (04) e20162969
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Pattnaik P, Nafday S, Angert R. Neonatal intensive care unit to home discharge communication: a quality improvement project. Pediatr Qual Saf 2023; 8 (04) e669
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Wu S, Tyler A, Logsdon T. et al. A quality improvement collaborative to improve the discharge process for hospitalized children. Pediatrics 2016; 138 (02) e20143604
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Cohen E, Patel H. Responding to the rising number of children living with complex chronic conditions. CMAJ 2014; 186 (16) 1199-1200
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Kieran E, Sara R, Claydon J. et al. Outcomes of neonates with complex medical needs. Adv Neonatal Care 2019; 19 (04) 275-284
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Yeh J, McGrath-Morrow SA, Collaco JM. Oxygen weaning after hospital discharge in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Pulmonol 2016; 51 (11) 1206-1211
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Collaco JM, Agarwal A, Austin ED. et al. Characteristics of infants or children presenting to outpatient bronchopulmonary dysplasia clinics in the United States. Pediatr Pulmonol 2021; 56 (06) 1617-1625
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Aoyama BC, Rice JL, McGrath-Morrow SA, Collaco JM. Mortality in outpatients with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Pediatr 2022; 241: 48-53.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 McGlynn JR, Aoyama BC, Martin A, Collaco JM, McGrath-Morrow SA. Outpatient respiratory outcomes in children with BPD on supplemental oxygen. Pediatr Pulmonol 2023; 58 (05) 1535-1541
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Ejiawoko A, Lee HC, Lu T, Lagatta J. Home oxygen use for preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia in California. J Pediatr 2019; 210: 55-62.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Lagatta J, Murthy K, Zaniletti I. et al. Home oxygen use and 1-year readmission among infants born preterm with bronchopulmonary dysplasia discharged from children's hospital neonatal intensive care units. J Pediatr 2020; 220: 40-48.e5
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Jensen EA, Edwards EM, Greenberg LT, Soll RF, Ehret DEY, Horbar JD. Severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia among very preterm infants in the United States. Pediatrics 2021; 148 (01) e2020030007
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Buendía JA, Ramírez Velasquez C, Benjumea-Bedoya D. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: incidence and severity in premature infants born at high altitude. Pediatr Pulmonol 2022; 57 (02) 470-475
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Lee SK, Ye XY, Singhal N, De La Rue S, Lodha A, Shah PS. Canadian Neonatal Network. Higher altitude and risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia among preterm infants. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30 (07) 601-606
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Fitzgerald DA. The infant with bronchopulmonary dysplasia on home oxygen: the oxygen weaning conundrum in the absence of good evidence. Paediatr Respir Rev 2023; 47: 11-15
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Bhandari A, Alexiou S. Outpatient management of established bronchopulmonary dysplasia: an update. Semin Perinatol 2023; 47 (06) 151820
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Balfour-Lynn IM, Field DJ, Gringras P. et al. Paediatric Section of the Home Oxygen Guideline Development Group of the BTS Standards of Care Committee. BTS guidelines for home oxygen in children. Thorax 2009; 64 (Suppl. 02) ii1-ii26
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Fauroux B, Abel F, Amaddeo A. et al. ERS statement on paediatric long-term noninvasive respiratory support. Eur Respir J 2022; 59 (06) 2101404
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Hayes Jr D, Wilson KC, Krivchenia K. et al. Home oxygen therapy for children. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 199 (03) e5-e23
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kapur N, Nixon G, Robinson P. et al. Respiratory management of infants with chronic neonatal lung disease beyond the NICU: a position statement from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand. Respirology 2020; 25 (08) 880-888
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Antony N, Anselmo M. 74 Variability on decision to discontinue supplemental oxygen among Canadian Pediatric respirologists in premature patients with BPD: a cross sectional survey study. Paediatr Child Health 2019; 24 (Suppl. 02) e29
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Everitt LH, Awoseyila A, Bhatt JM, Johnson MJ, Vollmer B, Evans HJ. Weaning oxygen in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Paediatr Respir Rev 2021; 39: 82-89
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Lagatta JM, Uhing M, Acharya K. et al. Actual and potential impact of a home nasogastric tube feeding program for infants whose neonatal intensive care unit discharge is affected by delayed oral feedings. J Pediatr 2021; 234: 38-45.e2
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Williams SL, Popowics NM, Tadesse DG, Poindexter BB, Merhar SL. Tube feeding outcomes of infants in a level IV NICU. J Perinatol 2019; 39 (10) 1406-1410
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Ermarth A, Thomas D, Ling CY, Cardullo A, White BR. Effective tube weaning and predictive clinical characteristics of NICU patients with feeding dysfunction. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2020; 44 (05) 920-927
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Caruso CG, Warren JB, Carney PA. Parent experiences of a remote patient monitoring program enabling early discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit with nasogastric tube feeding. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2023; 16 (02) 301-309
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Khalil ST, Uhing MR, Duesing L, Visotcky A, Tarima S, Nghiem-Rao TH. Outcomes of infants with home tube feeding: comparing nasogastric vs gastrostomy tubes. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2017; 41 (08) 1380-1385
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 2003; 15 (03) 261-266
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Burns KEA, Duffett M, Kho ME. et al. ACCADEMY Group. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ 2008; 179 (03) 245-252
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Toly VB, Musil CM, Bieda A, Barnett K, Dowling DA, Sattar A. Neonates and infants discharged home dependent on medical technology: characteristics and outcomes. Adv Neonatal Care 2016; 16 (05) 379-389
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Patel R, Nudelman M, Olarewaju A. et al. Homecare and healthcare utilization errors post-neonatal intensive care unit discharge. Adv Neonatal Care 2017; 17 (04) 258-264
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Berry JG, Hall M, Neff J. et al. Children with medical complexity and Medicaid: spending and cost savings. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014; 33 (12) 2199-2206
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Hannan KE, Hwang SS, Bourque SL. Readmissions among NICU graduates: who, when and why?. Semin Perinatol 2020; 44 (04) 151245
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Freeman JF, Deakyne S, Bajaj L. Emergency department-initiated home oxygen for bronchiolitis: a prospective study of community follow-up, caregiver satisfaction, and outcomes. Acad Emerg Med 2017; 24 (08) 920-929
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Fierro J, Herrick H, Fregene N. et al. Home pulse oximetry after discharge from a quaternary-care children's hospital: prescriber patterns and perspectives. Pediatr Pulmonol 2022; 57 (01) 209-216
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Freed GE, Meny R, Glomb WB, Hageman JR. Effect of home monitoring on a high-risk population. J Perinatol 2002; 22 (02) 165-167
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Bonafide CP, Localio AR, Ferro DF. et al. Accuracy of pulse oximetry-based home baby monitors. JAMA 2018; 320 (07) 717-719
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Bonafide CP, Jamison DT, Foglia EE. The emerging market of smartphone-integrated infant physiologic monitors. JAMA 2017; 317 (04) 353-354
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Graham KC, Cvach M. Monitor alarm fatigue: standardizing use of physiological monitors and decreasing nuisance alarms. Am J Crit Care 2010; 19 (01) 28-34 , quiz 35
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Cvach M. Monitor alarm fatigue: an integrative review. Biomed Instrum Technol 2012; 46 (04) 268-277
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Rhein L, White H, Simoneau T. et al. Transmitted home oximetry and duration of home oxygen in premature infants. Pediatrics 2020; 146 (02) e20200079
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Ermarth A, Ling CY. Partial enteral discharge programs for high-risk infants. Neoreviews 2022; 23 (01) e13-e22
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Edwards L, Cotten CM, Smith PB. et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Inadequate oral feeding as a barrier to discharge in moderately preterm infants. J Perinatol 2019; 39 (09) 1219-1228
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Lau C. To individualize the management care of high-risk infants with oral feeding challenges: what do we know? what can we do?. Front Pediatr 2020; 8: 296
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Lau C. Development of infant oral feeding skills: what do we know?. Am J Clin Nutr 2016; 103 (02) 616S-621S
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 van Kampen F, de Mol A, Korstanje J. et al. Early discharge of premature infants < 37 weeks gestational age with nasogastric tube feeding: the new standard of care?. Eur J Pediatr 2019; 178 (04) 497-503
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 White BR, Ermarth A, Thomas D, Arguinchona O, Presson AP, Ling CY. Creation of a standard model for tube feeding at neonatal intensive care unit discharge. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2020; 44 (03) 491-499
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Mago-Shah DD, Malcolm WF, Greenberg RG, Goldstein RF. Discharging medically complex infants with supplemental nasogastric tube feeds: impact on neonatal intensive care unit length of stay and prevention of gastrostomy tubes. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38 (S 01): e207-e214
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar