CC BY 4.0 · Aorta (Stamford)
DOI: 10.1055/a-2537-5390
Original Research Article

Evaluation of the Differences between Axial and Double Oblique Measurements of the Ascending Aorta on Gated, Contrast-Enhanced Thoracic Computed Tomography Scans: A Technical Note

1   Radiology Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System and University of California, San Diego, California
,
Eric Y. Chang
1   Radiology Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System and University of California, San Diego, California
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Background

The purpose of the study was to compare axial measurements of the ascending thoracic aorta on gated CT study studies with double oblique measurements and calculate the divergence between orthogonal axial and double oblique diameters of the tubular ascending aorta.

Methods

Retrospective measurements of axial and double oblique diameters were obtained in 153 consecutive patients.

Results

On average, the axial dimension exceeded the double oblique measurement.

Conclusion

Our study endorsed the subtraction of 0.58 mm from the axial diameter in order to obtain the double oblique measurement.



Publication History

Received: 09 July 2024

Accepted: 11 February 2025

Article published online:
22 April 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Freeman LA, Young PM, Foley TA, Williamson EE, Bruce CJ, Greason KL. CT and MRI assessment of the aortic root and ascending aorta. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200 (06) W581-92
  • 2 Erbel R, Eggebrecht H. Aortic dimensions and the risk of dissection. Heart 2006; 92 (01) 137-142
  • 3 Elefteriades JA, Mukherjee SK, Mojibian H. Discrepancies in measurement of the thoracic aorta: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76 (02) 201-217