Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2540-1044
Original Article

A Review of Minimally Invasive Techniques for Perfusion Optimization of Flaps

Micaela Tobin
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Charlotte Thomas
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Tricia Raquepo
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Mohammed Yamin
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Audrey Mustoe
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Agustin Posso
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Jose Foppiani
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Ryan P. Cauley
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background There is a growing emphasis on minimally invasive techniques as an alternative to surgical delay to promote vessel reorganization and prevent partial and total flap loss. This systematic review evaluates existing literature on these minimally invasive techniques, focusing on their potential applications in preventing ischemia-related complications.

Methods A systematic review was conducted in July 2024 using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. Inclusion criteria were studies that included patients undergoing any flap-based reconstruction treated with minimally invasive delay. Exclusion criteria were non-English papers, other systematic reviews, nonhuman patients, and pediatric patients.

Results Six studies were included (angiographic delay n = 143, heat preconditioning n = 191, ischemic preconditioning n = 60) which examined minimally invasive methods for perfusion optimization. Aggregated data from the three studies on angiographic delay demonstrated a 13% (18/143) combined skin or fat flap necrosis rate, which was lower than that of non-delayed flaps and comparable to more invasive traditional surgical ligation. Ischemic preconditioning showed no significant differences (p = 1.0) g compared with controls, whereas heat preconditioning led to reductions (26% vs. 35%) in flap necrosis and necrosis requiring surgical intervention (11% vs. 17%).

Conclusion Angiographic embolization presents a promising alternative to invasive surgical delay, effectively reducing flap necrosis risk. Heat and ischemic preconditioning also show potential for increasing flap survival, although current studies are limited by small sample sizes. Further research is essential to explore preoperative conditioning interventions to improve surgical outcomes for patients who require less invasive delay techniques.

Keywords

perfusion - heat preconditioning - ischemic preconditioning - angiographic embolization - preoperative conditioning


Publication History

Received: 01 November 2024

Accepted: 26 January 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
17 February 2025

Article published online:
11 March 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Soneja A, Drews M, Malinski T. Role of nitric oxide, nitroxidative and oxidative stress in wound healing. Pharmacol Rep 2005; 57 (suppl): 108-119
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Sen CK. The general case for redox control of wound repair. Wound Repair Regen 2003; 11 (06) 431-438
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Schreml S, Szeimies RM, Prantl L, Karrer S, Landthaler M, Babilas P. Oxygen in acute and chronic wound healing. Br J Dermatol 2010; 163 (02) 257-268
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kunselman AR. et al. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 711-721
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Manson PN. Factors associated with anastomotic failure after microvascular reconstruction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (01) 74-82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Fischer JP, Wink JD, Nelson JA. et al. A retrospective review of outcomes and flap selection in free tissue transfers for complex lower extremity reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (06) 407-416
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Corbitt C, Skoracki RJ, Yu P, Hanasono MM. Free flap failure in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 2014; 36 (10) 1440-1445
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Banic A, Boeckx W, Greulich M. et al. Late results of breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps: a prospective multicentric study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95 (07) 1195-1204 , discussion 1205–1206
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Wei FC, Celik N, Chen HC, Cheng MH, Huang WC. Combined anterolateral thigh flap and vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap in reconstruction of extensive composite mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (01) 45-52
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Tanaka N, Yamaguchi A, Ogi K, Kohama G. Sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flap for intraoral reconstruction after resection of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61 (10) 1179-1183
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Moran SL, Serletti JM. Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (07) 1954-1960 , discussion 1961–1962
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Ha JH, Lee SY, Choi TH, Park SO. Surgical delay increases the survival of expanded random-pattern flap in pediatric patients. Sci Rep 2023; 13 (01) 19204
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Hamilton K, Wolfswinkel EM, Weathers WM. et al. The delay phenomenon: a compilation of knowledge across specialties. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2014; 7 (02) 112-118
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Jonsson K, Hunt TK, Brennan SS, Mathes SJ. Tissue oxygen measurements in delayed skin flaps: a reconsideration of the mechanisms of the delay phenomenon. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 82 (02) 328-336
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Morris SF, Yang D. Effect of vascular delay on viability, vasculature, and perfusion of muscle flaps in the rabbit. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (04) 1041-1047
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 McFarlane RM, Heagy FC, Radin S, Aust JC, Wermuth RE. A study of the delay phenomenon in experimental pedicle flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 35: 245-262
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Restifo RJ, Ward BA, Scoutt LM, Brown JM, Taylor KJ. Timing, magnitude, and utility of surgical delay in the TRAM flap: II. Clinical studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (05) 1217-1223
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000097
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Babineau J. Product review: covidence (systematic review software). J Can Health Libr Assoc 2014; 35: 68-71
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. . Study Quality Assessment Tools. Accessed October 25, 2024 at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools
    PubMed
  • 21 Scheufler O, Andresen R, Kirsch A, Banzer D, Vaubel E. Clinical results of TRAM flap delay by selective embolization of the deep inferior epigastric arteries. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (04) 1320-1329
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Sever AJ, Patel C, Albeer Y, Darian VB. The technique and benefits of angiographic embolization of inferior epigastric arteries prior to pedicled tram flap breast reconstruction: results from a single center. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40 (12) 1845-1850
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Aboutanos SZ, Spinos E, Blanchet NP. Angiographic delay: a viable alternative to surgical delay. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (06) 562-567
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Mehta S, Rolph R, Cornelius V, Harder Y, Farhadi J. Local heat preconditioning in skin sparing mastectomy: a pilot study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (12) 1676-1682
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Mehta S, Cro SC, Coomber B, Rolph R, Cornelius V, Farhadi J. A randomised controlled feasibility trial to evaluate local heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: the preheat trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2019; 5: 5
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Krag AE, Hvas AM, Hvas CL, Kiil BJ. Remote ischemic preconditioning in microsurgical head and neck reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (01) e2591
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Andrews E, Bond J, Dolan S, Kirk S. Initial experience with breast reconstruction using the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap: a study of 45 patients. Ulster Med J 1999; 68 (01) 22-26
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Wang HT, Hartzell T, Olbrich KC, Erdmann D, Georgiade GS. Delay of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction improves flap reliability in the obese patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (02) 613-618 , discussion 619–620
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Codner MA, Bostwick III J, Nahai F, Bried JT, Eaves FF. TRAM flap vascular delay for high-risk breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (07) 1615-1622
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Ribuffo D, Muratori L, Antoniadou K. et al. A hemodynamic approach to clinical results in the TRAM flap after selective delay. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (06) 1706-1714
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Ducic I, Spear SL, Cuoco F, Hannan C. Safety and risk factors for breast reconstruction with pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps: a 10-year analysis. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55 (06) 559-564
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Spear SL, Ducic I, Cuoco F, Taylor N. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (03) 788-795
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Atisha D, Alderman AK, Janiga T, Singal B, Wilkins EG. The efficacy of the surgical delay procedure in pedicle TRAM breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63 (04) 383-388
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Erdmann D, Sundin BM, Moquin KJ, Young H, Georgiade GS. Delay in unipedicled TRAM flap reconstruction of the breast: a review of 76 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (03) 762-767
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Rücker M, Kadirogullari B, Vollmar B, Spitzer WJ, Menger MD. Improvement of nutritive perfusion after free tissue transfer by local heat shock-priming-induced preservation of capillary flowmotion. J Surg Res 2005; 123 (01) 102-108
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Harder Y, Amon M, Schramm R. et al. Heat shock preconditioning reduces ischemic tissue necrosis by heat shock protein (HSP)-32-mediated improvement of the microcirculation rather than induction of ischemic tolerance. Ann Surg 2005; 242 (06) 869-878 , discussion 878–879
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Rücker M, Schäfer T, Roesken F, Spitzer WJ, Bauer M, Menger MD. Local heat-shock priming-induced improvement in microvascular perfusion in osteomyocutaneous flaps is mediated by heat-shock protein 32. Br J Surg 2001; 88 (03) 450-457
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Minh TC, Ichioka S, Nakatsuka T. et al. Effect of hyperthermic preconditioning on the survival of ischemia-reperfused skin flaps: a new skin-flap model in the mouse. J Reconstr Microsurg 2002; 18 (02) 115-119
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Koenig WJ, Lohner RA, Perdrizet GA, Lohner ME, Schweitzer RT, Lewis Jr VL. Improving acute skin-flap survival through stress conditioning using heat shock and recovery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (04) 659-664
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Yildiz K, Karsidag S, Akcal A. et al. Comparison of the flap survival with ischemic preconditioning on different pedicles under varied ischemic intervals in a rat bilateral pedicled flap model. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (02) 129-135
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Civelek B, Selcuk T, Bilgen E, Demirbag E, Celebioglu S. Intermittent ischaemia of skin flaps shortens time taken to divide pedicles: an experimental study in rats. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2009; 43 (05) 241-244
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Zahir TM, Zahir KS, Syed SA, Restifo RJ, Thomson JG. Ischemic preconditioning of musculocutaneous flaps: effects of ischemia cycle length and number of cycles. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 40 (04) 430-435
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Zahir KS, Syed SA, Zink JR, Restifo RJ, Thomson JG. Ischemic preconditioning improves the survival of skin and myocutaneous flaps in a rat model. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (01) 140-150 , discussion 151–152
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Shakir S, Spencer AB, Kozak GM, Jablonka EM, Kanchwala SK. Make your own deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: perforator delay improves deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap reliability. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (11) e2478
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Lee KT, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Mun GH. Ischaemic time and fat necrosis in breast reconstruction with a free deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (02) 174-181
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Beugels J, Levine JL, Vasile JV, Craigie JE, Allen Sr RJ. The delay procedure in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153 (06) 1063e-1072e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Santucci RA, Linder ER, Wachtman GS, Crane CN. Planned and unplanned delayed anterolateral thigh flap phalloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (06) e3654
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Tafelmeier S, Kesseler E, Iancu AM, Nikoubashman O, Wiesmann M. Spectrum of complications and complication rates after diagnostic catheter angiography in neuroradiology. Clin Neuroradiol 2023; 33 (03) 763-768
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Myers MB, Cherry G. Augmentation of tissue survival by delay: an experimental study in rabbits. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967; 39 (04) 397-401
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Milton SH. The effects of “delay” on the survival of experimental pedicled skin flaps. Br J Plast Surg 1969; 22 (03) 244-252
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar