Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2540-2349
Clinical Decision Support to Reduce Hospital Length-of-Stay for Cancer Patients with Fever and Neutropenia

Abstract
Background
Pediatric cancer patients with fever and neutropenia are at risk for bacterial sepsis, traditionally requiring extended hospital stays on antibiotics until neutrophil counts recover. According to a newly validated scoring system, a subset of these patients is at lower risk and eligible for early discharge and reduced intravenous (IV) antibiotic exposure.
Objective
Reduce length-of-stay (LOS) for febrile neutropenic patients using clinical decision support (CDS) to identify low-risk patients.
Methods
A CDS system was developed to (1) screen febrile neutropenic patients using a validated clinical decision rule, (2) surface when low-risk patients become eligible for discharge, and (3) facilitate close phone follow-up for patients discharged early. The system was implemented in March 2023 and iteratively refined based on usability testing.
Results
Postimplementation, LOS did not improve significantly, and uptake of the CDS tool remained low. Though the tool had the potential to reduce LOS, the limited staff engagement was a significant barrier to success. Safety outcomes, including ICU readmissions and mortality, remained unaffected.
Conclusion
Despite carefully designed CDS applying an evidence-based scoring system and using human-centered design methodology, the failure to achieve the desired reduction in LOS was primarily due to insufficient uptake by clinical staff. This highlights the need for stronger strategies to ensure clinician engagement and integration into workflows for CDS tools to be effective.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
This study was part of the Quality Improvement Initiative and was deemed nonhuman subjects by the Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Institutional Review Board.
Publication History
Received: 09 December 2024
Accepted: 16 February 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
18 February 2025
Article published online:
11 June 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1
Haeusler GM,
Phillips R,
Slavin MA.
et al;
Australian PICNICC study group and the PREDICT network.
Re-evaluating and recalibrating predictors of bacterial infection in children with
cancer and febrile neutropenia. EClinicalMedicine 2020; 23: 100394
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Lehrnbecher T,
Robinson PD,
Ammann RA.
et al.
Guideline for the management of fever and neutropenia in pediatric patients with cancer
and hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients: 2023 update. J Clin Oncol 2023;
41 (09) 1774-1785
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Phillips B,
Morgan JE.
Meta-analytic validation of new ‘AUS’ febrile neutropenia risk score. Pediatr Blood
Cancer 2021; 68 (01) e28580
MissingFormLabel
- 4 RCH Low Risk FN Program Policy. 2020. Accessed November 9, 2024 at: https://www.rch.org.au/uploadedfiles/main/content/clinicalguide/guideline_index/policy_managment_neutropenia.pdf#:~:text=the%20aus-rule%20score%20is%20based%20on%20the%20fbe,can%20be%20safely%20transferred%20to%20home-based%20fn%20care
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Bright TJ,
Wong A,
Dhurjati R.
et al.
Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2012;
157 (01) 29-43
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Sutton RT,
Pincock D,
Baumgart DC,
Sadowski DC,
Fedorak RN,
Kroeker KI.
An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies
for success. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3: 17
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Shojania KG,
Jennings A,
Mayhew A,
Ramsay C,
Eccles M,
Grimshaw J.
Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review.
CMAJ 2010; 182 (05) E216-E225
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Jackson TJ,
Napper R,
Haeusler GM.
et al.
Can I go home now? The safety and efficacy of a new UK paediatric febrile neutropenia
protocol for risk-stratified early discharge on oral antibiotics. Arch Dis Child 2023;
108 (03) 192-197
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Kandaswamy S,
Williams H,
Thompson SA,
Dawson TE,
Muthu N,
Orenstein EW.
Realizing the full potential of clinical decision support: translating usability testing
into routine practice in health care operations. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (05) 1039-1048
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Bates DW,
Kuperman GJ,
Wang S.
et al.
Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based
medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10 (06) 523-530
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Ash JS,
Sittig DF,
Poon EG,
Guappone K,
Campbell E,
Dykstra RH.
The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider
order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14 (04) 415-423
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Thayer JG,
Miller JM,
Fiks AG,
Tague L,
Grundmeier RW.
Assessing the safety of custom web-based clinical decision support systems in electronic
health records: a case study. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (02) 237-246
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Eichner J,
Das M.
Challenges and Barriers to Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Design and Implementation
Experienced in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality CDS Demonstrations.
AHRQ National Resource Center for Health Information Technology. March 2010
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Ancker JS,
Edwards A,
Nosal S,
Hauser D,
Mauer E,
Kaushal R.
with the HITEC Investigators.
Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical
decision support system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17 (01) 36
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Jones BE,
Collingridge DS,
Vines CG.
et al.
CDS in a learning health care system: identifying physicians' reasons for rejection
of best-practice recommendations in pneumonia through computerized clinical decision
support. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (01) 1-9
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Sittig DF,
Singh H.
A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive
healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (Suppl. 03) i68-i74
MissingFormLabel