CC BY 4.0 · Endoscopy
DOI: 10.1055/a-2543-5672
Original article

Biliary drainage prior to pancreatoduodenectomy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy vs conventional Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: a propensity score matched study and surgeon-survey

Jeska A. Fritzsche
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
2   -, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN571165)
3   Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN571143)
,
4   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6034)
,
Bert A. Bonsing
5   Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
,
Olivier Busch
6   Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
2   -, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN571165)
3   Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN571143)
,
Freek Daams
6   Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
2   -, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN571165)
7   Treatment and Quality of LIfe, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN571143)
,
Wouter J.M. Derksen
8   Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6028)
9   Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN8124)
,
Lydi van Driel
10   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6993)
,
Sebastiaan Festen
11   Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN10215)
,
Erwin-Jan M. van Geenen
12   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6034)
,
Frederik J H Hoogwater
13   Department of Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN10173)
,
Akin Inderson
14   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN4501)
,
Sjoerd D. Kuiken
15   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN10215)
,
Mike S.L. Liem
16   Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN3231)
,
Daan J. Lips
16   Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN3231)
,
Maarten W. Nijkamp
13   Department of Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN10173)
,
Hjalmar Van Santvoort
17   Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6028)
9   Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN8124)
,
Peter D. Siersema
10   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6993)
,
Martijn W.J. Stommel
18   Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6034)
,
Niels G Venneman
19   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN3231)
,
Robert C Verdonk
20   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN6028)
,
Frank P. Vleggaar
21   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN8124)
,
Roeland F. de Wilde
22   Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
,
Marc. G. Besselink
6   Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
2   -, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN571165)
3   Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN571143)
,
23   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
2   -, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN571165)
3   Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN571143)
,
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
2   -, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN571165)
3   Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands (Ringgold ID: RIN571143)
› Author Affiliations

Background Preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage may lead to complications (16%-24%), potentially hampering surgical exploration. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) may reduce drainage-related complications, however it is unknown whether EUS-CDS could in itself hamper surgical exploration as series with surgeon reported outcomes are lacking. Aim is to assess the impact of preoperative EUS-CDS on pancreatoduodenectomy. Method Consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy after preoperative biliary drainage were included in all eight centers that performed EUS-CDS in the mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (Jan 2020-Dec 2022). Primary outcome was major postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included bile leak grade B/C, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade B/C, and overall postoperative complications. A propensity score matching (1:3) analysis was performed. Surgeons who performed a pancreatoduodenectomy after EUS-CDS were asked to complete a survey. Results Overall, 937 patients with pancreatoduodenectomy after preoperative biliary drainage were included (42 EUS-CDS, 895 ERCP). Major postoperative complications occurred in eight patients (19%) in the EUS-CDS group and 292 patients (33%) in the ERCP group (RR 0.50; 95%CI, 0.23-1.07). No significant differences were observed in overall complications (RR 0.95; 95%CI, 0.51-1.76), bile leak (RR 1.25; 95%CI, 0.31-4.98) or POPF (RR 0.62; 95%CI, 0.25-1.56). Results were similar after matching. The survey was completed for 29 pancreatoduodenectomies; surgery was not (n=13, 45%), ‘slightly’ (n=8, 28%), ‘clearly’ (n=5, 17%) or ‘severely’ (n=2, 7%) more complex because of the EUS-CDS. Conclusion This early experience suggests that preoperative biliary drainage with EUS-CDS does not increase the rate of complications after pancreatoduodenectomy and only infrequently hampers surgical exploration.



Publication History

Received: 03 October 2024

Accepted after revision: 19 February 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
20 February 2025

© . The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany