Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage on the management of difficult biliary cannulation in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction

Abstract

Background

Biliary drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) carries a higher risk of difficult biliary cannulation (DBC) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). After the failure of standard cannulation, endoscopists may proceed with advanced cannulation techniques and/or with endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD).

Methods

This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients with DMBO and a dilated common bile duct (CBD; >12 mm) who underwent ERCP for endoscopic biliary drainage in four European centers. The rates of DBC, technical and clinical success, and procedure-related adverse events (AEs) were assessed. The predictive factors for AEs were also investigated through regression analysis. The EUS-BD approach was considered either as the first option after standard cannulation failure or as the final option after advanced cannulation failure.

Results

1016 patients with DMBO were included in the study, with 524 (51.6%) matching the definition of DBC. Clinical success was achieved in 956 patients (94.1%). Procedure-related AEs were experienced by 167 patients (16.4%). Patients with DBC had a higher risk of AEs (P=0.003); however, patients undergoing “early” EUS-BD showed a risk of AEs comparable with those managed with standard cannulation (P=0.38). An attempt at any advanced cannulation technique was independently associated with the occurrence of AEs (P=0.001).

Conclusions

The risk of AEs is higher in patients with DMBO and DBC, this appears to be mainly related to the advanced cannulation techniques. In patients with a dilated CBD (>12 mm), “early” EUS-BD may minimize the risk of AEs.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 29. Juli 2024

Angenommen nach Revision: 21. Februar 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
21. Februar 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
05. Mai 2025

• References

• 1 Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou IS. et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline – Updated October 2017. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 910-930
• 2 Fugazza A, Troncone E, Amato A. et al. Difficult biliary cannulation in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction: An underestimated problem?. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54: 529-536
• 3 Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L. et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 657-83
• 4 Facciorusso A, Ramai D, Gkolfakis P. et al. Comparative efficacy of different methods for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 60-71.e12
• 5 van der Merwe SW, van Wanrooij RLJ, Bronswijk M. et al. Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 185-205
• 6 Fugazza A, Khalaf K, Spadaccini M. et al. Outcomes predictors in endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with lumen-apposing metal stent: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12: E456-E462
• 7 Jacques J, Privat J, Pinard F. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing stents: a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 540-547
• 8 Teoh AYB, Napoleon B, Kunda R. et al. EUS-guided choledocho-duodenostomy using lumen apposing stent versus ERCP with covered metallic stents in patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (DRA-MBO Trial). Gastroenterology 2023; 165: 473-482.e2
• 9 Chen YI, Sahai A, Donatelli G. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage of first intent with a lumen-apposing metal stent vs endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in malignant distal biliary obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled study (ELEMENT Trial). Gastroenterology 2023; 165: 1249-1261.e5
• 10 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M. et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 573-577
• 11 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
• 12 Dhir V, Bhandari S, Bapat M. et al. Comparison of EUS-guided rendezvous and precut papillotomy techniques for biliary access (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 354-359
• 13 Lee A, Aditi A, Bhat YM. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary access versus precut papillotomy in patients with failed biliary cannulation: a retrospective study. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 146-153
• 14 Choudhury A, Samanta J, Muktesh G. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous technique versus precut sphincterotomy as salvage technique in patients with benign biliary disease and difficult biliary cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177: 1361-1369
• 15 Sharma P, Vuthaluru S, Chowdhury S. et al. Global trends in the incidence and mortality of pancreatic cancer based on geographic location, socioeconomic status, and demographic shift. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128: 989-1002
• 16 Holt BA, Hawes R, Hasan M. et al. Biliary drainage: role of EUS guidance. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 160-165
• 17 García-Alonso FJ, Peñas-Herrero I, Sanchez-Ocana R. et al. The role of endoscopic ultrasound guidance for biliary and pancreatic duct access and drainage to overcome the limitations of ERCP: a retrospective evaluation. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 691-699
• 18 Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Repici A. et al. Timing of precut procedure does not influence success rate and complications of ERCP procedure: a prospective randomized comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 473-479
• 19 Janet J, Albouys J, Napoleon B. et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy following preoperative biliary drainage using endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus a transpapillary stent: a multicenter comparative cohort study of the ACHBT-FRENCH-SFED intergroup. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30: 5036-5046
• 20 Rimbaş M, Anderloni A, Napoléon B. et al. Common bile duct size in malignant distal obstruction and lumen-apposing metal stents: a multicenter prospective study. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E1801-E1810
• 21 Spadaccini M, Binda C, Fugazza A. et al. Informed consent for endoscopic biliary drainage: time for a new paradigm. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022; 58: 331
• 22 Binda C, Spadaccini M, Cugia L. et al. EUS and ERCP partnership. Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 11: 426-427
• 23 Geyl S, Redelsperger B, Yzet C. et al. Risk factors for stent dysfunction during long-term follow-up after EUS-guided biliary drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents: A prospective study. Endosc Ultrasound 2023; 12: 237-244
• 24 Vanella G, Bronswijk M, van Wanrooij RL. et al. Combined endoscopic mAnagement of BiliaRy and gastrIc OutLET obstruction (CABRIOLET study): A multicenter retrospective analysis. DEN Open 2022; 3: e132