Int J Sports Med
DOI: 10.1055/a-2559-8063
Review

Effects of HIIT and sprint interval training on adiposity in overweight adults: a meta-analysis

Haochong Liu
1   Sport Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China (Ringgold ID: RIN47838)
2   Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Limerick, Ireland (Ringgold ID: RIN548933)
,
Qian Li
3   Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China (Ringgold ID: RIN47838)
,
Wenpu Yang
1   Sport Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China (Ringgold ID: RIN47838)
,
Eric Tsz-Chun Poon
4   Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
5   Department of Sports science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong (Ringgold ID: RIN26451)
,
Haoyang Liu
3   Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China (Ringgold ID: RIN47838)
6   Sports Engineering Lab, School of Sports Engineering, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China (Ringgold ID: RIN47838)
,
Dapeng Bao
7   China Institute of Sport and Health Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China (Ringgold ID: RIN47838)
8   Medical Examination Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China (Ringgold ID: RIN66482)
,
Indy Man Kit Ho
9   Asian Academy for Sports and Fitness Professionals, Technological and Higher Education Institute of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong (Ringgold ID: RIN435815)
10   -, Asian Academy for Sports and Fitness Professionals, Hong kong, Hong Kong
11   Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia (Ringgold ID: RIN37631)
› Author Affiliations
Supported by: the National Key R&D Program of China No. 2019YFF0301803

A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and sprint interval training (SIT) on body fat reduction in adults with overweight or obesity. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, eight databases were searched, yielding 10 relevant studies involving 343 participants. Both HIIT and SIT significantly reduced body fat% (standardized mean difference [SMD]=-0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = (-0.89, -0.24), p = 0.001 and SMD=-0.57, 95% CI= (-0.85, -0.29), p= 0.000, respectively), fat mass (-0.62(-1.01, -0.23), p = 0.002 and -0.51 (-0.81, -0.21), p = 0.001, respectively), and body mass (-0.43 (-0.75, -0.11), p = 0.009 and -0.34(-0.58, -0.10), p = 0.006, respectively). No significant differences were found between HIIT and SIT in terms of body composition changes. However, the time spent on SIT was approximately 50% less than that of HIIT. Subgroup analysis suggested that SIT with shorter work durations (less than 10s) was more effective in obesity control. In conclusion, both HIIT and SIT demonstrated similar effectiveness in improving body adiposity. Given its time efficiency and straightforward intensity monitoring, SIT may serve as a viable alternative exercise program for promoting fat reduction in adults with overweight or obesity, provided it is appropriately designed.



Publication History

Received: 24 May 2024

Accepted after revision: 17 March 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
17 March 2025

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany