Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2641-7664
Management of Prenatally Diagnosed Malformations of the Central Nervous System: Factors Influencing Decision-making and the Time of Termination of Pregnancy
Article in several languages: English | deutschAuthors
Abstract
Introduction
CNS malformations are among the most common malformations diagnosed prenatally and one of the main reasons for late terminations of pregnancy. Making the correct diagnosis and prognostic counseling a33re complex. The aim of this study was to analyze pregnancy outcomes with regard to specific malformations, the factors which affect decision-making, and the time between diagnosis and termination as well as the causes of late diagnosis and late termination.
Patients and Method
A retrospective examination was carried out of all pregnancies with fetal CNS malformations treated at a perinatal center between 2003 and 2014. Termination rates, type of malformation, and gestational age at initial diagnosis and at termination were recorded. The factors influencing decision-making and the time between diagnosis and termination were analyzed statistically. A case-by-case analysis was carried out of any terminations performed after week 26+0 of gestation.
Results
In 139 of 251 cases (55.44%), the pregnancy was terminated between week 13+1 and week 38+2 of gestation (median: 22+4 GW). The median time from the initial diagnosis to the start of termination (Δtermination) was 10 days (range: 1 to 94 days). Relevant factors influencing the decision to terminate the pregnancy were the type of malformation compared to isolated ventriculomegaly (non-isolated ACC [aOR 17.5; p < 0.001], holoprosencephaly [aOR 24.4; p < 0.001], spina bifida [aOR 7.24; p < 0.001], other neural tube defects [aOR 62.5; p < 0.001]) and the presence of additional genetic anomalies (aOR 6.38; p = 0.014). The decision to terminate the pregnancy occurred less often when the diagnosis was made at or after week 22+0 of gestation (aOR 0.24; p < 0.001). Significant factors which affected the time between diagnosis and the start of termination (Δtermination) were: having a fetal MRI (HR 0.41; p = 0.003) and maternal age (HR 0.95 per additional year; p = 0.034). The interval between diagnosis and termination was significantly shorter if a destructive abnormality (HR 10.5; p = 0.004) or a (non-spina bifida) neural tube defect (HR 3.86; p = 0.002) was present. A known chromosomal aberration (p = 0.87), non-CNS anomalies (p = 0.58), or a diagnosis ≥ 22+0 GW (p = 0.74) affected the time between diagnosis and termination. The analysis of particularly late terminations from week 26+0 of gestation onwards found that avoidable delays in making the diagnosis or terminating the pregnancy only occurred in a few individual cases.
Conclusion
The diagnostic and prognostic complexity of cerebral malformations means that delayed diagnosis and prolonged decision-making are common, even under optimal conditions of care. Early introduction of standardized prenatal diagnostic examinations is needed for to ensure that the pregnant woman receives open-ended, informed counseling as soon as possible. But late termination of pregnancy is not necessarily negative as, in most cases, this is due to the need for a differentiated prenatal diagnostic evaluation – for example, a fetal MRI – and the ethical requirement of sufficient time to provide informed, well-considered decision-making.
Publication History
Received: 14 February 2025
Accepted after revision: 22 June 2025
Article published online:
02 September 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References/Literatur
- 1 Myrianthopoulos NC. Epidemiology of central nervous System Malformations. In: Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW. , ed. Handbook of clinical Neurology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1977: 139-171
- 2 Barel O, Vaknin Z, Smorgick N. et al. Fetal abnormalities leading to third trimester abortion: nine-year experience from a single medical center. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 223-228
- 3 Dathan-Stumpf A, Kern J, Faber R. et al. Prenatal and Obstetric Parameters of Late Terminations: A Retrospective Analysis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81: 807-818
- 4 Domröse CM, Bremer S, Buczek C. et al. Termination of pregnancy following prenatally diagnosed central nervous system malformations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018; 298: 903-910
- 5 Dommergues M, Mandelbrot L, Mahieu-Caputo D. et al. Termination of pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis in France: how severe are the foetal anomalies?. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 531-539
- 6 Vaknin Z, Lahat Y, Barel O. et al. Termination of pregnancy due to fetal abnormalities performed after 23 weeks’ gestation: analysis of indications in 144 cases from a single medical center. Fetal Diagn Ther 2009; 25: 291-296
- 7 Corbacıoğlu A, Aslan H, Aydın S. et al. Trends in fetal indications for termination of pregnancy between 2002 and 2010 at a tertiary referral centre. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2012; 13: 85-90
- 8 Kähler C, Schramm T, Bald R. et al. Aktualisierte Qualitätsanforderungen an die Ultraschall- Screeninguntersuchung in der pränatalen Basisdiagnostik (=DEGUM-Stufe I) im Zeitraum 18 + 0 bis 21 + 6 Schwangerschaftswochen. Ultraschall Med 2020; 41: 499-503
- 9 Davutoglu EA, Arica G, Sahin NE. et al. Clinical characteristics and perinatal outcome of fetuses with ventriculomegaly. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 310: 2065-2071
- 10 De Keersmaecker B, Jansen K, Aertsen M. et al. Outcome of partial agenesis of corpus callosum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230: 456.e1-456.e9
- 11 Domröse CM, Bremer S, Buczek C. et al. Termination of pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida: a German perspective. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 294: 731-737
- 12 Bolluk G, Bakirci IT, Cok M. et al. Evaluating pregnancy termination decisions for fetal anomalies: a retrospective study in a tertiary referral center. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2024; 70: e20231118
- 13 Johnson CY, Honein MA, Dana Flanders W. et al. Pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of anencephaly or spina bifida: a systematic review of the literature. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2012; 94: 857-863
- 14 Machado IN, Martinez SD, Barini R. Anencephaly: do the pregnancy and maternal characteristics impact the pregnancy outcome?. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2012; 2012: 127490
- 15 Tairou F, de Wals P, Bastide A. Validity of death and stillbirth certificates and hospital discharge summaries for the identification of neural tube defects in Quebec City. Chronic Dis Can 2006; 27: 120-124
- 16 van Adama Scheltema PN, Nagel HTC, Brouwer OF. et al. Outcome of children with prenatally diagnosed central nervous system malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 41-47
- 17 Rouleau C, Gasner A, Bigi N. et al. Prevalence and timing of pregnancy termination for brain malformations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011; 96: F360-F364
- 18 Fleurke-Rozema JH, Vogel TA, Voskamp BJ. et al. Impact of introduction of mid-trimester scan on pregnancy outcome of open spina bifida in The Netherlands. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 553-556
