Aortic Dimensions in a South Asian Population: Establishing Normative Data and Implications for Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background

Diameter of the aorta is a significant contributor and predictor for complications and a fundamental parameter for intervention. It is recognized that age, sex, and ethnicity play a role in aortic size. We thus sought to determine the normal dimensions among our population.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of images was done of all polytrauma patients admitted between January 2018 and December 2022 who underwent protocolized noncontrast computed tomography of the chest and abdomen to measure the aortic diameter at established reference points.

Results

There were 513 patients; the mean age was 36.5 ± 14.6 (range: 18–86), and 382 (74.5%) were males. Aortic dimensions at sinus, mid-ascending, arch, descending, suprarenal, and infrarenal aorta were 30.7 ± 3.8, 29.3 ± 4.5, 24.9 ± 3.3, 20.1 ± 3.0, 19.4 ± 2.9, and 15.3 ± 2.2, respectively. Age demonstrated a positive correlation to the diameter at the ascending, descending, and infrarenal aorta (r = 0.58, p = 0.001 [95% confidence interval, CI = 0.519; 0.634]; r = 0.69, p = 0.001 [95% CI = 0.641; 0.732]; r = 0.57, p = 0.001 [95% CI = 0.509; 0.626]) along with the length of the ascending aorta (r = 0.420, p = 0.001 [95% CI = 0.345; 0.488]; r = 0.536, p = 0.001 [95% CI = 0.471; 0.595]; r = 0.476, p = 0.001 [95% CI = 0.406; 0.540), respectively. There was a positive correlation of aortic diameters to body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Females had smaller dimension at the reference points, but without any statistical significance. There were 50 (9.8%) patients with bovine aortic arch and 10 (1.9%) with separate origin of left vertebral artery.

Conclusion

Normal values of the diameter of the aorta for a South Asian population are provided. Diameter is affected by age, length of the ascending aorta, BMI, SBP, and DBP. This study suggests that the aorta size is smaller in the South Asian population than the referenced Western population, more significantly for distal descending and abdominal aorta and that ethnicity plays a role in determining aortic dimensions.

Keywords

aorta - size - South Asian

Publication History

Received: 15 June 2025

Accepted: 19 December 2025

Article published online:
14 January 2026

• References

• 1 Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black III J. et al; Peer Review Committee Members. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2022; 146 (24) e334-e482
• 2 Czerny M, Grabenwöger M, Berger T. et al; Authors/Task Force Members, EACTS/STS Scientific Document Group. EACTS/STS guidelines for diagnosing and treating acute and chronic syndromes of the aortic organ. Ann Thorac Surg 2024; 118 (01) 5-115
• 3 Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C. et al; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2014; 35 (41) 2873-2926
• 4 Turkbey EB, Jain A, Johnson C. et al. Determinants and normal values of ascending aortic diameter by age, gender, and race/ethnicity in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 39 (02) 360-368
• 5 Obel LM, Diederichsen AC, Steffensen FH. et al. Population-based risk factors for ascending, arch, descending, and abdominal aortic dilations for 60-74-year-old individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 78 (03) 201-211
• 6 Wolak A, Gransar H, Thomson LEJ. et al. Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: normal limits by age, gender, and body surface area. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 1 (02) 200-209
• 7 Ayoub C, Kumar G, Smith CY. et al. Reference values for mid-ascending aorta diameters by transthoracic echocardiography in adults. Am J Cardiol 2018; 122 (06) 1068-1073
• 8 Pham MHC, Ballegaard C, de Knegt MC. et al. Normal values of aortic dimensions assessed by multidetector computed tomography in the Copenhagen General Population Study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 20 (08) 939-948
• 9 Zafar MA, Chen JF, Wu J. et al; Yale Aortic Institute Natural History Investigators. Natural history of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 161 (02) 498-511.e1
• 10 Lee SH, Lee W, Choi HJ. et al. Measurement of the aortic diameter in the asymptomatic Korean population: assessment with multidetector CT. J Korean Soc Radiol 2013; 69 (02) 105-112
• 11 Pape LA, Tsai TT, Isselbacher EM. et al; International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) Investigators. Aortic diameter >or = 5.5 cm is not a good predictor of type A aortic dissection: observations from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Circulation 2007; 116 (10) 1120-1127
• 12 Evangelista A, Isselbacher EM, Bossone E. et al; IRAD Investigators. Insights from the international registry of acute aortic dissection: a 20-year experience of collaborative clinical research. Circulation 2018; 137 (17) 1846-1860
• 13 Mansour AM, Peterss S, Zafar MA. et al. Prevention of aortic dissection suggests a diameter shift to a lower aortic size threshold for intervention. Cardiology 2018; 139 (03) 139-146
• 14 Rylski B, Branchetti E, Bavaria JE. et al. Modeling of predissection aortic size in acute type A dissection: more than 90% fail to meet the guidelines for elective ascending replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (03) 944-8.e1
• 15 Central Bureau of Statistics (Nepal). National Population and Housing Census 2021 National Report. Kathmandu: National Statistics Office; 2023. Accessed January 9, 2026; available at: https://docs.censusnepal.cbs.gov.np/Documents/5bf7981e-d72e-4ae3-9668-38cf2336dbdd.pdf
• 16 Evangelista A, Flachskampf FA, Erbel R. et al; European Association of Echocardiography, Document Reviewers. Echocardiography in aortic diseases: EAE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010; 11 (08) 645-658
• 17 Elefteriades JA, Farkas EA. Thoracic aortic aneurysm clinically pertinent controversies and uncertainties. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55 (09) 841-857
• 18 Kälsch H, Lehmann N, Möhlenkamp S. et al. Body-surface adjusted aortic reference diameters for improved identification of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms: results from the population-based Heinz Nixdorf Recall study. Int J Cardiol 2013; 163 (01) 72-78
• 19 Wu J, Zeng W, Li X. et al. Aortic size distribution among normal, hypertension, bicuspid, and Marfan populations. Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract 2023; 1 (02) qyad019
• 20 Parve S, Ziganshin BA, Elefteriades JA. Overview of the current knowledge on etiology, natural history and treatment of aortic dissection. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2017; 58 (02) 238-251
• 21 Teoh MK, Ramasamy D, Wong KP. Ultrasound screening of the abdominal aorta in Malaysians. Aust N Z J Surg 1992; 62 (11) 862-865
• 22 Ullah S, Imtiaz N, Ullah S, Fahad MS, Nisar U, Ibrahim N. Evaluation Of normal diameter of infra-renal aorta in a Pakistani population using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2022; 34 (04) 838-842
• 23 Paruchuri V, Salhab KF, Kuzmik G. et al. Aortic size distribution in the general population: explaining the size paradox in aortic dissection. Cardiology 2015; 131 (04) 265-272
• 24 Karadzha A, Schaff HV, Frye RL. et al. Post-mortem examination of fatal acute type A aortic dissection: what does it teach us?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 65 (01) ezad432
• 25 Zafar MA, Li Y, Rizzo JA. et al. Height alone, rather than body surface area, suffices for risk estimation in ascending aortic aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 155 (05) 1938-1950
• 26 Berger JA, Elefteriades JA. Toward uniformity in reporting of thoracic aortic diameter. Int J Angio 2012; 21 (04) 243-244