Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2787-8747
Injectable Nuances for the Male Face
Authors
Abstract
Aims and Backgrounds
Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures consistently lead the aesthetic landscape year after year. Men are increasingly requesting aesthetic interventions with a focus on maintaining a youthful, powerful, and natural look. There are significant anatomical, physiological, and behavioral differences in the aging male face that warrant specific treatment considerations.
Technology
Literature review of male gender-specific facial anatomy, aging patterns, treatment motivations/preferences. Description of the author's preferred injection techniques.
Current and Future Development
Male and female faces are shaped by different aesthetic standards, impacting what is deemed attractive. Men are keenly aware of the sexual dimorphism in facial characteristics and often seek to preserve or enhance traits associated with traditional masculinity. Minimally invasive procedures can be customized to enhance or retain masculine features.
Conclusion and Clinical Relevance
Gaining a deeper understanding of factors affecting male rejuvenation patterns and learning specific injectable techniques will empower aesthetic providers to tailor cosmetic treatments for men, achieving success and encouraging continued growth of this burgeoning demographic.
Keywords
male injectables - male aging face - male aesthetics - male facial rejuvenation - male facial anatomyDeclaration of GenAI Use
During the writing process of this article, the author used the Microsoft Word spell check feature in order to correct spelling, refine grammar, and format the text. The author has reviewed and edited the text and take full responsibility for the content of the article.
Publication History
Received: 17 August 2025
Accepted after revision: 08 January 2026
Article published online:
23 January 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2024 Annual Trends Survey. 2025. Accessed June 20, 2025, at: https://www.aafprs.org/media/press_releases/2024_annual_trends_survey.aspx?websitekey=5d3e122f-6cba-47ca-a903-c75cb1c94f61
- 2 2022 ASPS Procedural Statistics Release. 2025. American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2023. Accessed June 15, 2025, at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/news/statistics/2022/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2022.pdf
- 3 2024 ASPS Procedural Statistics Release. 2025. American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2025. Accessed July 5, 2025, at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/news/statistics/2024/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2024.pdf
- 4 Rieder EA, Mu EW, Brauer JA. Men and cosmetics: Social and psychological trends of an emerging demographic. J Drugs Dermatol 2015; 14 (09) 1023-1026
- 5 Clarke LH, Griffin M. Visible and invisible ageing: beauty work as a response to ageism. Ageing Soc 2008; 28 (05) 653-674
- 6 Cohen BE, Bashey S, Wysong A. Literature review of cosmetic procedures in men: approaches and techniques are gender specific. Am J Clin Dermatol 2017; 18 (01) 87-96
- 7 Jagdeo J, Keaney T, Narurkar V, Kolodziejczyk J, Gallagher CJ. Facial treatment preferences among aesthetically oriented men. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (10) 1155-1163
- 8 Ohrlund A, Winlof P, Bromee T, Prygova I. Differentiation of NASHA and OBT hyaluronic acid gels according to strength, flexibility, and associated clinical significance. J Drugs Dermatol 2024; 23 (01) 1332-1336
- 9 Nikolis A, Enright KM, Cotofana S, Nguyen Q, Raco L, Weiner S. Intracorporeal evaluation of hyaluronic acid fillers with varied rheological properties and correlations with aesthetic outcomes. Skin Res Technol 2024; 30 (07) e13838
- 10 Segura S, Anthonioz L, Fuchez F, Herbage B. A complete range of hyaluronic acid filler with distinctive physical properties specifically designed for optimal tissue adaptations. J Drugs Dermatol 2012; 11 (1, suppl): s5-s8
- 11 de Maio M. Ethnic and gender considerations in the use of facial injectables: male patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (5, suppl): 40S-43S
- 12 Farhadian JA, Bloom BS, Brauer JA. Male aesthetics: a review of facial anatomy and pertinent clinical implications. J Drugs Dermatol 2015; 14 (09) 1029-1034
- 13 Torlakovic L, Faerøvig E. Age-related changes of the soft tissue profile from the second to the fourth decades of life. Angle Orthod 2011; 81 (01) 50-57
- 14 Bain J. Epidemiology, evaluation and diagnosis of andropause. Geriatr Aging 2003; 6 (S10): 4-8
- 15 Keaney TC. Aging in the male face: intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (07) 797-803
- 16 Handler MZ, Goldberg DJ. Cosmetic concerns among men. Dermatol Clin 2018; 36 (01) 5-10
- 17 deVries MW. Psychosocial factors in facial surgery: a practical guide. Facial Plast Surg 1995; 11 (02) 61-67
- 18 Foo YZ, Simmons LW, Rhodes G. Predictors of facial attractiveness and health in humans. Sci Rep 2016; 6 (39731): 1-12
- 19 Kleisner K, Chvátalová V, Flegr J. Perceived intelligence is associated with measured intelligence in men but not women. PLoS One 2014; 9 (03) e81237
- 20 Tsukahara K, Hotta M, Osanai O, Kawada H, Kitahara T, Takema Y. Gender-dependent differences in degree of facial wrinkles. Skin Res Technol 2013; 19 (01) e65-e71
- 21 Kane MA, Cox SE, Jones D, Lei X, Gallagher CJ. Heterogeneity of crow's feet line patterns in clinical trial subjects. Dermatol Surg 2015; 41 (04) 447-456
- 22 Carruthers J, Fagien S, Matarasso SL. Botox Concensus Group concensus recommendations on the use of botulinum toxin type A in facial aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (6S): 1S-22S
- 23 Lambros V, Amos G. Facial shape, size, and gender. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (05) 1012-1014
- 24 Keaney TC, Anolik R, Braz A. et al. The Male aesthetic patient: facial anatomy, concepts of attractiveness, and treatment patterns. J Drugs Dermatol 2018; 17 (01) 19-28
- 25 Kim HS, Kim C, Cho H, Hwang JY, Kim YS. A study on glabellar wrinkle patterns in Koreans. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 28 (10) 1332-1339
- 26 Ugradar S, Manoukian N, Azhdam A. et al. Orbital aging: a computed tomography–tased study of 240 orbits. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150 (03) 536e-545e
- 27 Wysong A, Kim D, Joseph T, MacFarlane DF, Tang JY, Gladstone HB. Quantifying soft tissue loss in the aging male face using magnetic resonance imaging. Dermatol Surg 2014; 40 (07) 786-793
- 28 Spiegel JH. Facial determinants of female gender and feminizing forehead cranioplasty. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (02) 250-261
- 29 Vazirnia A, Braz A, Fabi SG. Nonsurgical jawline rejuvenation using injectable fillers. J Cosmet Dermatol 2020; 19 (08) 1940-1947
- 30 Goel A, Rai K. Midface rejuvenation using Juvederm fillers in male patients. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2022; 15 (03) 209-215
- 31 Wysong A, Joseph T, Kim D, Tang JY, Gladstone HB. Quantifying soft tissue loss in facial aging: a study in women using magnetic resonance imaging. Dermatol Surg 2013; 39 (12) 1895-1902
- 32 Ezure T, Yagi E, Kunizawa N, Hirao T, Amano S. Comparison of sagging at the cheek and lower eyelid between male and female faces. Skin Res Technol 2011; 17 (04) 510-515
- 33 Smith KC. Reversible vs. nonreversible fillers in facial aesthetics: concerns and considerations. Dermatol Online J 2008; 14 (08) 3
- 34 Woodward J, Ranjit-Reeves R, Katz DF, Bernardini FP, Fagien S. Comparing water absorption of food and drug administration-approved hyaluronic acid fillers. Dermatol Surg 2021; 47 (09) 1237-1242
- 35 Sykes JM, Suárez GA. Chin advancement, augmentation, and reduction as adjuncts to rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2016; 43 (01) 295-306
- 36 Ellis M, Choe J, Barnett SL, Chen K, Bradley JP. Facial feminization: perioperative care and surgical approaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153 (01) 181e-193e
- 37 Penna V, Stark GB, Iblher N. Aging changes of the male lips: a lesser evil than in females?. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78 (03) 334-337
- 38 Paes EC, Teepen HJ, Koop WA, Kon M. Perioral wrinkles: histologic differences between men and women. Aesthet Surg J 2009; 29 (06) 467-472
- 39 Chen B, Ma L, Wang J. Chin augmentation with hyaluronic acid: an injection technique based on anatomical morphology. Dermatol Surg 2022; 48 (07) 747-751
- 40 Wang JV, Valiga A, Albornoz CA, Geronemus RG. Comparison of injectable filler locations in men and women: an age-matched case analysis. J Cosmet Dermatol 2021; 20 (08) 2469-2471
- 41 Mommaerts MY. The ideal male jaw angle–an internet survey. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44 (04) 381-391
- 42 Somenek M. Minimally invasive male facial rejuvenation: energy-based devices. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2024; 32 (03) 437-445
- 43 Rahman E, Rao P, Philipp-Dormston W. et al. Intradermal botulinum toxin A on skin quality and facial rejuvenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2024; 12 (08) e6084
- 44 Chang SP, Tsai HH, Chen WY, Lee WR, Chen PL, Tsai TH. The wrinkles soothing effect on the middle and lower face by intradermal injection of botulinum toxin type A. Int J Dermatol 2008; 47 (12) 1287-1294
- 45 Redaelli A, Siddiqui Syed S, Liu X. et al. Two multinational, observational surveys investigating perceptions of beauty and attitudes and experiences relating to aesthetic medical procedures. J Cosmet Dermatol 2020; 19 (11) 3020-3031
