Download PDF
J Wrist Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2793-1422
Scientific Article

A Retrospective Review of Scaphoid Nonunion Treatment: Does Graft Type Impact Union Rate and Correction of Humpback Deformity?

Authors

  • Stephanie W. Holzmer 

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    3   Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

  • Rayan El Bachaoui

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    4   Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

  • Dafang Zhang

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

  • Brandon Earp

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

  • Philip Blazar

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose

Various modalities have been utilized in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion, including structural, non-structural, and vascularized bone grafts. This study was designed to assess the impact of bone graft type on the rate of union and correction of scaphoid height–length ratio (HLR).

Methods

A multi-institution, retrospective review was conducted, identifying patients treated operatively for scaphoid nonunion between 2014 and 2024. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the graft utilized: Cancellous, non-vascularized corticocancellous, and pedicled vascularized bone graft. Outcomes evaluated included achievement of bony union and correction of scaphoid HLR. Additionally, the impacts of preoperative avascular necrosis (AVN) and the fixation method utilized on the union rate were investigated.

Results

Sixty-three patients underwent scaphoid nonunion repair with bone grafting between 2014 and 2024. Twenty-three patients were treated with vascularized bone graft, 17 patients were treated with cancellous-only autograft, and 23 patients were treated with corticocancellous autograft. There were no statistical differences in union rate between the three groups. The pooled union rate was 50/63 (79.3%). Union rates for vascularized, cancellous, and corticocancellous groups were 73.9%, 94.1%, and 73.9%, respectively. The preoperative presence of AVN was not found to have an effect on the postoperative union rate; however, the use of Kirschner wires for fixation was significantly associated with higher rates of nonunion. In general, patients who received corticocancellous bone grafts experienced a greater HLR correction postoperatively; however, this was not statistically significant when compared between groups.

Conclusions

Union rate for treatment of scaphoid nonunion was highest with the utilization of cancellous only graft, and correction of the scaphoid HLR was greatest with the utilization of corticocancellous graft. Neither of these trends, however, reached statistical significance, likely due to low sample size. Union rate did not differ based on the presence of preoperative AVN, but was affected by the method of fixation utilized—use of K-wire fixation should be avoided.

Keywords

humpback deformity - scaphoid nonunion - unstable scaphoid nonunion - vascularized bone graft


Publication History

Received: 10 October 2025

Accepted: 18 January 2026

Article published online:
04 February 2026

© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Inoue G, Shionoya K, Kuwahata Y. Herbert screw fixation for scaphoid nonunions. An analysis of factors influencing outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; (343) 99-106
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Trezies AJ, Davis TR, Barton NJ. Factors influencing the outcome of bone grafting surgery for scaphoid fracture non-union. Injury 2000; 31 (08) 605-607
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Little CP, Burston BJ, Hopkinson-Woolley J, Burge P. Failure of surgery for scaphoid non-union is associated with smoking. J Hand Surg [Br] 2006; 31 (03) 252-255
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Braga-Silva J, Peruchi FM, Moschen GM, Gehlen D, Padoin AV. A comparison of the use of distal radius vascularised bone graft and non-vascularised iliac crest bone graft in the treatment of non-union of scaphoid fractures. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2008; 33 (05) 636-640
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Goyal T, Sankineani SR, Tripathy SK. Local distal radius bone graft versus iliac crest bone graft for scaphoid nonunion: A comparative study. Musculoskelet Surg 2013; 97 (02) 109-114
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Wells ME, Nicholson TC, Macias RA, Nesti LJ, Dunn JC. Incidence of scaphoid fractures and associated injuries at US trauma centers. J Wrist Surg 2021; 10 (02) 123-128
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Pinder RM, Brkljac M, Rix L, Muir L, Brewster M. Treatment of scaphoid nonunion: A systematic review of the existing evidence. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (09) 1797-1805.e3
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Ferguson DO, Shanbhag V, Hedley H, Reichert I, Lipscombe S, Davis TRC. Scaphoid fracture non-union: A systematic review of surgical treatment using bone graft. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41 (05) 492-500
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Guldbrandsen CW, Radev DI, Gvozdenovic R. Normal ranges for measurements of the scaphoid bone from sagittal computed tomography images. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2021; 46 (06) 594-599
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Laulan J, Marteau E, Bacle G. Wrist osteoarthritis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015; 101 (1 Suppl): S1-S9
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Wada T, Aoki M, Usui M, Ishii S. DISI deformity and post-operative symptoms of scaphoid non-union. Hand Surg 1999; 4 (02) 117-124
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Hegazy G, Massoud AH, Seddik M. et al. Structural versus nonstructural bone grafting for the treatment of unstable scaphoid waist nonunion without avascular necrosis: A randomized clinical trial. J Hand Surg Am 2021; 46 (06) 462-470
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Sawaizumi T, Nanno M, Nanbu A, Ito H. Vascularised bone graft from the base of the second metacarpal for refractory nonunion of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (07) 1007-1012
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Kuhlmann JN, Mimoun M, Boabighi A, Baux S. Vascularized bone graft pedicled on the volar carpal artery for non-union of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg [Br] 1987; 12 (02) 203-210
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Bertelli JA, Tacca CP, Rost JR. Thumb metacarpal vascularized bone graft in long-standing scaphoid nonunion–a useful graft via dorsal or palmar approach: A cohort study of 24 patients. J Hand Surg Am 2004; 29 (06) 1089-1097
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Bullens PHJ, Driesprong M, Lacroix H, Vegter J. Treatment of scaphoid non-union with a percutaneous corticocancellous bone graft. J Hand Surg [Br] 2005; 30 (04) 365-368
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Tambe AD, Cutler L, Murali SR, Trail IA, Stanley JK. In scaphoid non-union, does the source of graft affect outcome? Iliac crest versus distal end of radius bone graft. J Hand Surg [Br] 2006; 31 (01) 47-51
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Finsen V, Hofstad M, Haugan H. Most scaphoid non-unions heal with bone chip grafting and Kirschner-wire fixation. Thirty-nine patients reviewed 10 years after operation. Injury 2006; 37 (09) 854-859
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Chim H, Malkoc F, Tay SC, Yam A, Teoh LC. Technique of olecranon bone grafting for surgical fixation of scaphoid fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (07) 1220-1223
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Van Nest DS, Reynolds M, Warnick E, Sherman M, Ilyas AM. Volar plating versus headless compression screw fixation of scaphoid nonunions: A meta-analysis of outcomes. J Wrist Surg 2021; 10 (03) 255-261
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Quadlbauer S, Pezzei C, Jurkowitsch J. et al. Double screw versus angular stable plate fixation of scaphoid waist nonunions in combination with intraoperative extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143 (07) 4565-4574
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Quadlbauer S, Pezzei C, Beer T. et al. Treatment of scaphoid waist nonunion by one, two headless compression screws or plate with or without additional extracorporeal shockwave therapy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139 (02) 281-293
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Schmidle G, Ebner HL, Klauser AS, Fritz J, Arora R, Gabl M. Correlation of CT imaging and histology to guide bone graft selection in scaphoid non-union surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2018; 138 (10) 1395-1405
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Nakamoto JC, Xavier RM, Burgos FH. et al. Comparative analysis of scaphoid nonunion treatment with screw fixation and angular stable plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143 (04) 2247-2253
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Wataya EY, Meneghel GH, Mores V, Nakamoto JC, Xavier Jr. RM. Comparative analysis of cancellous graft and cortico-cancellous graft in osteosynthesis of scaphoid pseudoarthrosis with plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143 (11) 6955-6963
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Zhang H, Gu J, Liu H, Yuan C. Pedicled vascularized versus non-vascularized bone grafts in the treatment of scaphoid non-union: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. ANZ J Surg 2021; 91 (11) E682-E689
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Duncumb JW, Robinson PG, Williamson TR. et al. Bone grafting for scaphoid nonunion surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B (05) 549-558
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Rancy SK, Wolfe SW, Jerome JTJ. Predictors of failure for vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafting of scaphoid nonunions: A systematic review. J Hand Microsurg 2021; 14 (04) 322-335
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Fujihara Y, Yamamoto M, Hidaka S, Sakai A, Hirata H. Vascularised versus non-vascularised bone graft for scaphoid nonunion: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and comparative studies. JPRAS Open 2022; 35: 76-88
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 30 Guria A, Vaibhav K, Kumar N, Kullu S. Vascularized versus non-vascularized bone grafting for scaphoid non-union: A meta-analysis. Cureus 2025; 17 (01) e77711
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 31 Merrell GA, Wolfe SW, Slade III JF. Treatment of scaphoid nonunions: Quantitative meta-analysis of the literature. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27 (04) 685-691
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 32 Christodoulou LS, Kitsis CK, Chamberlain ST. Internal fixation of scaphoid non-union: A comparative study of three methods. Injury 2001; 32 (08) 625-630
    Search in Google Scholar