Prophylactic clipping after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive and effective treatment for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps; however, it carries a relevant risk of adverse events (AEs), such as delayed bleeding, as well as postprocedural perforation (PPP) and postelectrocoagulation syndrome (PECS). Systematic defect closure may reduce these risks, but its preventive efficacy remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy of prophylactic clipping after colorectal ESD.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and SCOPUS through to June 2025 for RCTs comparing prophylactic clipping vs. no clipping after colorectal ESD in adults. The primary outcome was clinically significant delayed bleeding; secondary outcomes included PPP and PECS, as well as subanalysis by location and size. Random-effects models were used to compute risk ratios (RRs) and 95%CIs.

Results

Four RCTs from Asia including 684 patients were analyzed (336 with clipping, 348 controls). Prophylactic clipping significantly reduced clinically significant delayed bleeding risk (0.3% vs. 3.4%; RR 0.26, 95%CI 0.08–0.88). No significant differences were found for PPP (0.4% vs. 1.0%; RR 0.74; 95%CI 0.23–2.35) or PECS (12.2% vs. 11.8%; RR 1.06; 95%CI 0.74–1.52). Subgroup analyses by lesion size (>30 mm vs. <30 mm) and location (proximal vs. distal colon) were not significant.

Conclusions

A 74% decrease in the risk of clinically significant delayed bleeding is achieved by prophylactic clipping after colorectal ESD, supporting its adoption in routine practice.

Publication History

Received: 28 August 2025

Accepted after revision: 26 January 2026

Article published online:
27 February 2026

• References

• 1 Jacques J, Schaefer M, Wallenhorst T. et al. Endoscopic en bloc versus piecemeal resection of large nonpedunculated colonic adenomas: a randomized comparative trial. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177: 29-38
• 2 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y. et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1217-1225
• 3 Alfarone L, Schaefer M, Wallenhorst T. et al. Impact of annual case volume on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes in a large prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 2025; 120: 370-378
• 4 Kobayashi N, Takeuchi Y, Ohata K. et al. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: Prospective, multicenter, cohort trial. Dig Endosc 2022; 34: 1042-1051
• 5 Iwatsubo T, Takeuchi Y, Yamasaki Y. et al. Differences in clinical course of intraprocedural and delayed perforation caused by endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: a retrospective study. Dig Dis 2019; 37: 53-62
• 6 Albouys J, Montori Pina S, Boukechiche S. et al. Risk of delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: the Limoges Bleeding Score. Endoscopy 2024; 56: 110-118
• 7 Maselli R, Galtieri PA, Di Leo M. et al. Cost analysis and outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions in an outpatient setting. Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51: 391-396
• 8 Ohata K, Kobayashi N, Sakai E. et al. Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal epithelial neoplasms: a prospective, multicenter, cohort trial from Japan. Gastroenterology 2022; 163: 1423-1434.e2
• 9 Ogasawara N, Yoshimine T, Noda H. et al. Clinical risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in Japanese patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 28: 1407-1414
• 10 Boda K, Oka S, Tanaka S. et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors: a large multicenter retrospective study from the Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Research Group. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 714-722
• 11 Albéniz E, Álvarez MA, Espinós JC. et al. Clip closure after resection of large colorectal lesions with substantial risk of bleeding. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 1213-1221.e4
• 12 Pohl H, Grimm IS, Moyer MT. et al. Clip closure prevents bleeding after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 977-984.e3
• 13 Gupta S, Sidhu M, Shahidi N. et al. Effect of prophylactic endoscopic clip placement on clinically significant postendoscopic mucosal resection bleeding in the right colon: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7: 152-160
• 14 Liu M, Zhang Y, Wang Y. et al. Effect of prophylactic closure on adverse events after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35: 1869-1877
• 15 Dong L, Zhu W, Zhang X. et al. Does prophylactic closure improve outcomes after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2024; 34: 94-100
• 16 Lee SP, Sung I, Kim JH. et al. Effect of prophylactic endoscopic closure for an artificial ulceration after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019; 54: 1291-1299
• 17 Nomura S, Shimura T, Katano T. et al. A multicenter, single-blind randomized controlled trial of endoscopic clipping closure for preventing coagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 859-867.e1
• 18 Miyakawa A, Tamaru Y, Mizumoto T. et al. Prophylactic clip closure after endoscopic submucosal dissection of large flat and sessile colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (EPOC trial). Gut 2025; 74: 1814-1820
• 19 Osada T, Sakamoto N, Ritsuno H. et al. Closure with clips to accelerate healing of mucosal defects caused by colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 4438-4444
• 20 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71
• 21 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
• 22 De Cristofaro E, Jacques J, Montori S. et al. Impact of prophylactic clipping on delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter propensity score-matched study. Endoscopy 2025;
• 23 De Cristofaro E, Grimaldi J, Jacques J. et al. Clinical and environmental implications of a high-density clip closure after endoscopic submucosal dissection: is it worth it?. Endoscopy 2025; 57: E1173-E1174
• 24 Takada K, Yoshida N, Hayashi Y. et al. Prophylactic clip closure in preventing delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients on anticoagulants: a multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan. Endoscopy 2025; 57: 631-642
• 25 Farha J, Ramberan H, Aihara H. et al. A novel through-the-scope helix tack-and-suture device for mucosal defect closure following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter study. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 571-577
• 26 Shiomi D, Tanabe M, Uragami N. et al. Clinical utility of a novel anchor pronged clip for mucosal defect closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Endosc Int Open 2024; 12: E1127-E1133