RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2810-0347
Atrial Fibrillation, Anticoagulants, and CRC Outcomes: A Nationwide 20-Year Study
Autor*innen
Funding Information The writing and preparation of this paper were supported and funded in part by the research grant of Eimskipasjodur at the University of Iceland (nr 96512) and the Scientific grant of Landspitali (nr A-2021-011).

Abstract
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death and presents most often with occult or overt gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). Oral anticoagulation (OAC) use has been hypothesized to increase the rate of GIB events and potentially cause early detection of CRC. This study aimed to investigate whether prior use of OAC could decrease overall or cancer-specific mortality in patients with CRC.
Methods
All patients with CRC in Iceland from 2000 to 2019 were identified from the Icelandic Cancer Registry. Through a detailed review of medical records, clinical data were obtained. Comorbidity was assessed using the Charlson comorbidity index. Inverse probability weighting was used to balance the study groups.
Results
Of 2,563 patients, 173 were taking OACs due to atrial fibrillation and were diagnosed with CRC. OAC users were predominantly older males with a higher comorbidity index. While staging was not significantly different, tumor size and lymph node metastases were different. After weighting, OAC users had a similar overall mortality (HR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.91–1.28, p = 0.37), but lower CRC-specific mortality (HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57–1.00, p = 0.046), specifically in the first 5 years. Cardiovascular mortality was significantly higher in OAC users.
Conclusion
Patients on OACs due to atrial fibrillation had lower CRC-specific mortality, suggesting that OAC use could be associated with survival benefits through early detection of CRC. However, these results should be interpreted carefully due to substantial competing cardiovascular mortality.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author (E.S.B.).
Ethical Approval
The study was approved by the National Bioethics Committee (Nr. VSN-14-162).
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 25. Juli 2025
Angenommen nach Revision: 10. Februar 2026
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Februar 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Sawicki T, Ruszkowska M, Danielewicz A, Niedźwiedzka E, Arłukowicz T, Przybyłowicz KE. A review of colorectal cancer in terms of epidemiology, risk factors, development, symptoms and diagnosis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13 (09) 2025
- 2 GBD 2019 Colorectal Cancer Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7 (07) 627-647
- 3 Lawrenson R, Logie J, Marks C. Risk of colorectal cancer in general practice patients presenting with rectal bleeding, change in bowel habit or anaemia. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2006; 15 (03) 267-271
- 4 Astin M, Griffin T, Neal RD, Rose P, Hamilton W. The diagnostic value of symptoms for colorectal cancer in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2011; 61 (586) e231-e243
- 5 Hreinsson JP, Jonasson JG, Bjornsson ES. Bleeding-related symptoms in colorectal cancer: a 4-year nationwide population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 39 (01) 77-84
- 6 Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E. et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 383 (9921) 955-962
- 7 Ingason AB, Hreinsson JP, Ágústsson AS. et al. Rivaroxaban is associated with higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding than other direct oral anticoagulants: a nationwide propensity score-weighted study. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174 (11) 1493-1502
- 8 Chen Q, Toorop MMA, Tops LF, Lijfering WM, Cannegieter SC. Time trends in patient characteristics, anticoagulation treatment, and prognosis of incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the Netherlands. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (04) e239973-e239973
- 9 Marzec LN, Wang J, Shah ND. et al. Influence of direct oral anticoagulants on rates of oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69 (20) 2475-2484
- 10 Ágústsson AS, Ingason AB, Rumba E. et al. Causes of gastrointestinal bleeding in oral anticoagulant users compared to non-users in a population-based study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2022; 57 (02) 239-245
- 11 Rasmussen PV, Dalgaard F, Gislason GH. et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding and the risk of colorectal cancer in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2022; 43 (07) e38-e44
- 12 Abrahami D, Renoux C, Yin H, Fournier JP, Azoulay L. The association between oral anticoagulants and cancer incidence among individuals with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost 2020; 120 (10) 1384-1394
- 13 Haaland GS, Falk RS, Straume O, Lorens JB. Association of warfarin use with lower overall cancer incidence among patients older than 50 years. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177 (12) 1774-1780
- 14 Clemens A, Strack A, Noack H, Konstantinides S, Brueckmann M, Lip GY. Anticoagulant-related gastrointestinal bleeding–could this facilitate early detection of benign or malignant gastrointestinal lesions?. Ann Med 2014; 46 (08) 672-678
- 15 Johannsdottir GA, Onundarson PT, Gudmundsdottir BR, Bjornsson ES. Screening for anemia in patients on warfarin facilitates diagnosis of gastrointestinal malignancies and pre-malignant lesions. Thromb Res 2012; 130 (03) e20-e25
- 16 O'Rorke MA, Murray LJ, Hughes CM, Cantwell MM, Cardwell CR. The effect of warfarin therapy on breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer survival: a population-based cohort study using the clinical practice research datalink. Cancer Causes Control 2015; 26 (03) 355-366
- 17 Sigurdardottir LG, Jonasson JG, Stefansdottir S. et al. Data quality at the Icelandic Cancer Registry: comparability, validity, timeliness and completeness. Acta Oncol 2012; 51 (07) 880-889
- 18 Stuart EA, Lee BK, Leacy FP. Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66 (8, suppl): S84-S90 , 90.e1
- 19 Zhang Z, Kim HJ, Lonjon G, Zhu Y. written on behalf of AME Big-Data Clinical Trial Collaborative Group. Balance diagnostics after propensity score matching. Ann Transl Med 2019; 7 (01) 16
- 20 Latouche A, Allignol A, Beyersmann J, Labopin M, Fine JP. A competing risks analysis should report results on all cause-specific hazards and cumulative incidence functions. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66 (06) 648-653
- 21 Hashash JG, Shamseddeen W, Skoury A, Aoun N, Barada K. Gross lower gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy: endoscopic findings, management, and clinical outcomes. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 43 (01) 36-42
- 22 Jabre P, Roger VL, Murad MH. et al. Mortality associated with atrial fibrillation in patients with myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2011; 123 (15) 1587-1593
- 23 Tanaka Y, Shah NS, Passman R, Greenland P, Lloyd-Jones DM, Khan SS. Trends in cardiovascular mortality related to atrial fibrillation in the United States, 2011 to 2018. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10 (15) e020163
- 24 Abraham NS, Barkun AN, Sauer BG. et al. American College of Gastroenterology-Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: management of anticoagulants and antiplatelets during acute gastrointestinal bleeding and the periendoscopic period. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117 (04) 542-558
- 25 Tomaselli GF, Mahaffey KW, Cuker A. et al. 2020 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on management of bleeding in patients on oral anticoagulants: a report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76 (05) 594-622
- 26 Veitch AM, Radaelli F, Alikhan R. et al. Endoscopy in patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy: British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline update. Gut 2021; 70 (09) 1611-1628