Tabakpolitik

Zusammenfassung

Eine umfassende Tabakkontrollpolitik umfasst 10 Handlungsfelder, die einerseits auf die Nachfrage nach Tabak und andererseits auf das Angebot Einfluss nehmen. Aufseiten der Nachfrageregulierung sind folgende Maßnahmen von Bedeutung: 1. Die Schaffung einer rauchfreien Umwelt, 2. Die Etablierung eines hohen Preises für Tabakprodukte, 3. Die umfassende öffentliche Aufklärung (schulische und massenmediale Tabakprävention), 4. Ein umfassendes Werbe- und Promotionsverbot, 5. Adäquate Verbraucherinformation und 6. Leicht zugängliche Beratungs- und Behandlungsmaßnahmen zur Tabakentwöhnung. Aufseiten der Angebotsregulierung sind folgende Maßnahmen von Bedeutung: 7. Die strikte Produktkontrolle, 8. Die restriktive Regulierung der Abgabe und des Vertriebs von Tabakwaren, 9. Maßnahmen zur Unterbindung des Schmuggels und 10. Der Schutz der Umwelt durch Regulierung des Tabakanbaus und der Verarbeitung des Tabaks. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zu diesen Handlungsfeldern werden dargestellt und diskutiert. Der derzeitige Umsetzungsstand in Deutschland wird umrissen und zukünftige Prioritäten der deutschen Tabakkontrollpolitik aufgezeigt.

Abstract

A comprehensive tobacco control policy covers 10 fields of activities, which aim to reduce demand and supply of tobacco. The following measures are designed to reduce demand: 1. comprehensive smoke-free policies on public places and workplaces, 2. a high real prize for tobacco products, 3. public education (school education on tobacco and mass media campaigns), 4. a total ban of advertising and promotion, 5. comprehensive consumer information, and 6. easy access to evidence-based smoking cessation. Measures to reduce supply include: 7. strict control of the product, 8. sales and distribution regulations, 9. measures to combat smuggling, and 10. protection of the environment in regard to tobacco cultivation and manufacture. Studies for all tobacco control fields are presented and discussed. The current status of the implementation and future activities in Germany are described.

Schlüsselwörter

Tabakkontrolle - Gesundheitspolitik - Deutschland - Überblicksarbeit

Key words

Tobacco Control - Health Policy - Germany - Review

Literatur

• 1 Doll R. Uncovering the effects of smoking: historical perspective.  Stat Methods Med Res. 1998;  7 87-117
• 2 Proctor RN. The anti-tobacco campaign of the Nazis: a little known aspect of public health in Germany, 1933-45.  BMJ. 1996;  313 1450-1453
• 3 Bachinger E, MacKee M. Tobacco policies in Austria during the Third Reich.  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007;  11 1033-1037
• 4 Proctor RN. Commentary: Schairer and Schoniger's forgotten tobacco epidemiology and the Nazi quest for racial purity.  Int J Epidemiol. 2001;  30 31-34
• 5 Grüning T, Gilmore AB, MacKee M. Tobacco industry influence on science and scientists in Germany.  Am J Public Health. 2006;  96 20-32
• 6 Tuffs A. German government under attack for anti-smoking advertisements.  BMJ. 2003;  327 360
• 7 Shibuya K, Ciecierski C, Guindon E. et al . WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: development of an evidence based global public health treaty.  BMJ. 2003;  327 154-157
• 8 Gostin LO. Global regulatory strategies for tobacco control.  JAMA. 2007;  298 2057-2059
• 9 Davis RM, Wakefield M, Amos A. et al . The Hitchhiker's Guide to Tobacco Control: a global assessment of harms, remedies, and controversies.  Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;  28 171-194
• 10 Hanewinkel R, Isensee B. Five in a row–reactions of smokers to tobacco tax increases: population-based cross-sectional studies in Germany 2001–2006.  Tob Control. 2007;  16 34-37
• 11 Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung .Förderung des Nichtrauchens bei Jugendlichen 2007. Eine Repräsentativbefragung der Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung. Köln: BzgA 2007
• 12 Jamrozik K. Policy priorities for tobacco control.  BMJ. 2004;  328 1007-1009
• 13 Hirayama T. Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan.  BMJ. 1981;  282 183-185
• 14 Radon K, Nowak D. Passiv Rauchen – aktueller Stand des Wissens.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004;  129 157-162
• 15 Fichtenberg CM, Glantz SA. Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review.  BMJ. 2002;  325 188
• 16 Evans WN, Farrelly MC, Montgomery E. Do workplace smoking bans reduce smoking?.  Am Econ Rev. 1999;  89 728-747
• 17 Howell F. Smoke-free bars in Ireland: a runaway success.  Tob Control. 2005;  14 73-74
• 18 Alamar B, Glantz SA. Effect of smoke-free laws on bar value and profits.  Am J Public Health. 2007;  97 1400-1402
• 19 Allwright S, Paul G, Greiner B. et al . Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study.  BMJ. 2005;  331 1117
• 20 Gallus S, Zuccaro P, Colombo P. et al . Effects of new smoking regulations in Italy.  Ann Oncol. 2006;  17 346-347
• 21 Gorini G, Costantini AS, Paci E. Smoking prevalence in Italy after the smoking ban: towards a comprehensive evaluation of tobacco control programs in Europe.  Prev Med. 2007;  45 123-124
• 22 Semple S, Maccalman L, Naji AA. et al . Bar workers’ exposure to second-hand smoke: the effect of Scottish smoke-free legislation on occupational exposure.  Ann Occup Hyg. 2007;  51 571-580
• 23 Akhtar PC, Currie DB, Currie CE. et al . Changes in child exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (CHETS) study after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland: national cross sectional survey.  BMJ. 2007;  335 545
• 24 Haw SJ, Gruer L. Changes in exposure of adult non-smokers to secondhand smoke after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland: national cross sectional survey.  BMJ. 2007;  335 549
• 25 Farkas AJ, Gilpin EA, White MM. et al . Association between household and workplace smoking restrictions and adolescent smoking.  JAMA. 2000;  284 717-722
• 26 Siegel M, Albers AB, Cheng DM. et al . Local restaurant smoking regulations and the adolescent smoking initiation process: results of a multilevel contextual analysis among Massachusetts youth.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;  162 477-483
• 27 Hamilton G, Cross D, Lower T. et al . School policy: what helps to reduce teenage smoking?.  Nicotine Tob Res. 2003;  5 507-513
• 28 Wakefield MA, Chaloupka FJ, Kaufman NJ. et al . Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study.  BMJ. 2000;  321 333-337
• 29 Repace J. Flying the smoky skies: secondhand smoke exposure of flight attendants.  Tob Control. 2004;  13 ((Suppl. 1)) i8-19
• 30 Chapman S. The future of smoke-free legislation.  BMJ. 2007;  335 521-522
• 31 Gallet CA, List JA. Cigarette demand: a meta-analysis of elasticities.  Health Econ. 2003;  12 821-835
• 32 Hanewinkel R, Isensee B. Opinion on tobacco tax increase: Factors associated with individuals’ support in Germany.  Health Policy. 2008;  86 234-238
• 33 Hanewinkel R, Radden C, Rosenkranz T. Price increase causes fewer sales of factory-made cigarettes and higher sales of cheaper loose tobacco in Germany.  Health Econ. 2008;  17 683-693
• 34 Frieden TR, Bloomberg MR. How to prevent 100 million deaths from tobacco.  Lancet. 2007;  369 1758-1761
• 35 Farrelly MC, Niederdeppe J, Yarsevich J. Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: past, present, and future directions.  Tob Control. 2003;  12 ((Suppl. 1)) i35-i47
• 36 Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland ML. et al . Evidence of a dose-response relationship between “truth” antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence.  Am J Public Health. 2005;  95 425-431
• 37 Joossens L, Raw M. The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity.  Tob Control. 2006;  15 247-253
• 38 Hanewinkel R. Inhaltliche, konzeptionelle und organisatorische Bedingungen einer erfolgreichen schulischen Prävention des Rauchens.  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2003;  46 677-682
• 39 Dobbins M, Decorby K, Manske S, Goldblatt E. Effective practices for school-based tobacco use prevention.  Prev Med. 2008;  46 289-297
• 40 Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung .Förderung des Nichtrauchens. Eine Widerholungsbefragung der Bundezentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung. Köln, BzgA 2006
• 41 Hanewinkel R. „Be Smart – Don’t Start”. Ergebnisse des Nichtraucherwettbewerbs in Deutschland 1997–2007.  Gesundheitswesen. 2007;  69 38-44
• 42 Hoeflmayr D, Hanewinkel R. Do school-based tobacco prevention programmes pay off? The cost-effectiveness of the ‘Smoke-free Class Competition’.  Public Health. 2008;  122 34-41
• 43 DiFranza JR, Richards JW, Paulman PM. et al . RJR Nabisco's cartoon camel promotes camel cigarettes to children.  JAMA. 1991;  266 3149-3153
• 44 Evans N, Farkas A, Gilpin E. et al . Influence of tobacco marketing and exposure to smokers on adolescent susceptibility to smoking.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;  87 1538-1545
• 45 Biener L, Siegel M. Tobacco marketing and adolescent smoking: more support for a causal inference.  Am J Public Health. 2000;  90 407-411
• 46 Pierce JP, Gilpin EA. A historical analysis of tobacco marketing and the uptake of smoking by youth in the United States: 1890-1977.  Health Psychol. 1995;  14 500-508
• 47 Quentin W, Neubauer S, Leidl R. et al . Advertising bans as a means of tobacco control policy: a systematic literature review of time-series analyses.  Int J Public Health. 2007;  52 295-307
• 48 Hanewinkel R, Pohl J. Auswirkungen eines totalen Werbeverbots für Tabakprodukte – ein Diskussionsbeitrag.  Sucht. 2001;  47 104-113
• 49 Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation?.  Proc R Soc Med. 1965;  58 295-300
• 50 DiFranza JR, Wellman RJ, Sargent JD. et al . Tobacco promotion and the initiation of tobacco use: assessing the evidence for causality.  Pediatrics. 2006;  117 e1237-e1248
• 51 Hanewinkel R, Sargent JD. Exposure to smoking in popular contemporary movies and youth smoking in Germany.  Am J Prev Med. 2007;  32 466-473
• 52 Hanewinkel R, Sargent JD. Exposure to smoking in internationally distributed American movies and youth smoking in Germany: a cross-cultural cohort study.  Pediatrics. 2008;  121 e108-e117
• 53 Hammond D, Fong GT, Borland R. et al . Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: findings from the international tobacco control four country study.  Am J Prev Med. 2007;  32 202-209
• 54 Chapman S, Liberman J. Ensuring smokers are adequately informed: reflections on consumer rights, manufacturer responsibilities, and policy implications.  Tob Control. 2005;  14 ((Suppl. 2)) ii8-13
• 55 Jarvis MJ. Epidemiology of cigarette smoking and cessation.  J Clin Psychiatry Monograph. 2003;  18 11
• 56 Fiore MC, Jaen CR. A clinical blueprint to accelerate the elimination of tobacco use.  JAMA. 2008;  299 2083-2085
• 57 Coleman T. ABC of smoking cessation. Use of simple advice and behavioural support.  BMJ. 2004;  328 397-399
• 58 Molyneux A. Nicotine replacement therapy.  BMJ. 2004;  328 454-456
• 59 Meyer C, Ulbricht S, Baumeister SE. et al . Proactive interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice: a quasi-randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of computer-tailored letters and physician-delivered brief advice.  Addiction. 2008;  103 294-304
• 60 Hoch E, Muehlig S, Hofler M. et al . How prevalent is smoking and nicotine dependence in primary care in Germany?.  Addiction. 2004;  99 1586-1598
• 61 Curry SJ, Grothaus LC, MacAfee T. et al . Use and cost effectiveness of smoking-cessation services under four insurance plans in a health maintenance organization.  N Engl J Med. 1998;  339 673-679
• 62 Gartner CE, Hall WD, Chapman S. et al . Should the health community promote smokeless tobacco (snus) as a harm reduction measure?.  PLoS Med. 2007;  4 e185
• 63 Batra A. Kontrolliertes Rauchen – moderner Therapieansatz oder therapeutischer Irrtum?.  Sucht. 2003;  49 54-56
• 64 Drinkmann A. Kontrolliertes Rauchen: Standortbestimmung und Perspektiven.  Suchttherapie. 2002;  3 81-86
• 65 Warda L, Tenenbein M, Moffatt ME. House fire injury prevention update. Part I. A review of risk factors for fatal and non-fatal house fire injury.  Inj Prev. 1999;  5 145-150
• 66 Gunja M, Wayne GF, Landman A. et al . The case for fire safe cigarettes made through industry documents.  Tob Control. 2002;  11 346-353
• 67 Arnott D, Berteletti F. Europe: Agreement on reducing cigarette fires.  Tob Control. 2008;  17 4-5
• 68 Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Miller JY. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention.  Psychol Bull. 1992;  112 64-105
• 69 Hanewinkel R, Isensee B. One for every 113 inhabitants: cigarette vending machines in Germany.  Int J Epidemiol. 2006;  35 1104-1105
• 70 Hanewinkel R, Isensee B. Verfügbarkeit von Zigaretten.  J Verbr Lebensm. 2008;  2 335-340
• 71 Wakefield M, Germain D, Henriksen L. The effect of retail cigarette pack displays on impulse purchase.  Addiction. 2008;  103 322-328
• 72 Arnott D, Joossens L, Bianco E. et al . Smuggling treaty could reduce tobacco toll.  Lancet. 2008;  371 458-460
• 73 Stehr M. Cigarette tax avoidance and evasion.  J Health Econ. 2005;  24 277-297
• 74 Hanewinkel R, Isensee B. Access to cheaper cross-border cigarettes may decrease smoking cessation intentions in Germany.  Tob Control. 2007;  16 70-71
• 75 Geist HJ. Global assessment of deforestation related to tobacco farming.  Tob Control. 1999;  8 18-28
• 76 Novotny TE, Zhao F. Consumption and production waste: another externality of tobacco use.  Tob Control. 1999;  8 75-80
• 77 Siegel M. The effectiveness of state-level tobacco control interventions: a review of program implementation and behavioral outcomes.  Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;  23 45-71

Korrespondenzadresse