Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery with a Bite-plate: Our Experience with Brain Metastases

Abstract

Non-invasive frameless stereotactic radiosurgical systems have recently been developed. We report our experience of frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with a bite-plate for brain metastases. Between February 2002 and December 2005, 147 patients with brain metastases were treated with C-arm linear accelerator-based SRS and 122 patients were followed up by our institute. An optic tracking system with infrared light-emitting diodes was used for real-time monitoring. A bite-plate with fiducial markers was applied as a first-line method for frameless SRS. Head-ring fixation was used in patients lacking teeth. Lung carcinomas (63%) were the most common primary tumors, followed by breast carcinomas (13%). Ninety patients underwent radiosurgery with a bite-plate and 32 patients underwent fixation of a head ring. Males were significantly more predominant in the head-ring group (26 men and 6 women), compared with the bite-plate group (47 men and 43 women, p<0.01). The average age (62 years) in the bite-plate group was significantly younger than that (68 years) in the head-ring group (p<0.01). The median survival time was 12.0 months in the bite-plate group and 8.0 months in the head-ring group (p=0.0621). Nine patients who had brain metastases in or close to the brain stem were treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. The frameless stereotactic radiosurgical system with a bite-plate is safe and effective for the treatment of brain metastasis. Elderly male patients sometimes are edentulous and require placement of a head ring for radiosurgery.

brain metastases - frameless - radiosurgery - stereotactic techniques

References

• 1 Nakagawa K, Tago M, Shibata K. et al . Intercomparison of dose distribution between gamma knife and C-arm-mounted linac.  Radiat Med. 2003;  21 178-182
• 2 Tamaki N, Ehara K, Fujita K. C-arm multi-axis rotation stereotactic linac radiation system.  J Radiosurg. 2000;  3 21-27
• 3 Herbert CE, Ebert MA, Whittall DS. et al . Effect of bite tray impression technique on relocation accuracy in frameless stereotactic radiotherapy.  Med Dosim. 2003;  28 27-30
• 4 Ryken TC, Meeks SL, Pennington EC. et al . Initial clinical experience with frameless stereotactic radiosurgery: analysis of accuracy and feasibility.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;  51 1152-1158
• 5 Meeks SL, Bova FJ, Wagner TH. et al . Image localization for frame-less stereotactic radiotherapy.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;  46 1291-1299
• 6 Ulm AJ, Friedman WA, Bova FJ. et al . Linear accelerator radiosurgery in the treatment of brain metastases.  Neurosurgery. 2004;  55 1076-1085
• 7 Joseph J, Adler JR, Cox RS. et al . Linear accelerator-based stereotaxic radiosurgery for brain metastases: the influence of number of lesions on survival.  J Clin Oncol. 1996;  14 1085-1092
• 8 Kondziolka D, Martin JJ, Flickinger JC. et al . Long-term survivors after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases.  Cancer. 2005;  104 2784-2791
• 9 Salles AA De, Hariz M, Bajada CL. et al . Comparison between radiosurgery and stereotactic fractionated radiation for the treatment of brain metastases.  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1993;  58 115-118
• 10 Manning MA, Cardinale RM, Benedict SH. et al . Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy as an alternative to radiosurgery for the treatment of patients with brain metastases.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;  47 603-608
• 11 Bova FJ, Buatti JM, Friedman WA. et al . The University of Florida frameless high-precision stereotactic radiotherapy system.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;  38 875-882
• 12 Chang SD, Main W, Martin DP. et al . An analysis of the accuracy of the cyberknife: a robotic frameless stereotactic radiosurgical system.  Neurosurgery. 2003;  52 140-147

Correspondence