Semin Thromb Hemost 2008; 34(4): 356-360
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1085478
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Are the Current Attempts at Standardization of Antiphospholipid Antibodies Still Useful? Emerging Technologies Signal a Shift in Direction

Laura Andreoli1 , Silvia Rizzini2 , Flavio Allegri1 , Pierluigi Meroni2 , Angela Tincani1
  • 1Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
  • 2Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Milan, IRCSS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
23. September 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

The pathogenic role of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been widely established over past years in several experimental models and clinical studies. Accordingly, the detection of aPL by immunoassays (anticardiolipin antibodies; anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies) has become a routine practice in the clinical workup of patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. aPL are mostly assayed using commercial ELISA kits, whose performance has not been found to be sufficiently concordant among the different manufacturers. In the past years, collaborative groups have spent considerable effort to reach some form of standardization but this process is still ongoing. Such lack of standardization has recently become even more crucial, as manufacturers have had to face an increasing demand for fully automated tests for aPL, like those test systems that have been developed for other autoantibodies (e.g., antinuclear antibodies, anti-ENA antibodies). We therefore report our recent experience with two newly developed automated methods for anticardiolipin antibodies testing. In particular, we discuss the results obtained using routine samples, as we believe that these better reflect the “real-life” situation in which those automated methods will operate. We also mention other emerging technologies in the field of aPL detection.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Laurell A B, Nilsson I M. Hypergamma-globulinemia, circulating anticoagulant and biologic false positive Wassermann reaction: a study of 2 cases.  J Lab Clin Med. 1957;  49 694-707
  • 2 Loizou S, Mc Crea J D, Rudge A C et al.. Measurement of anticardiolipin antibodies by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): standardization and quantitation of results.  Clin Exp Immunol. 1985;  62 738-745
  • 3 Miyakis S, Lockshin M D, Atsumi T et al.. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).  J Thromb Haemost. 2006;  4 295-306
  • 4 Tincani A, Allegri F, Balestrieri G et al.. Minimal requirements for antiphospholipid antibodies ELISAs proposed by the European Forum on antiphospholipid antibodies.  Thromb Res. 2004;  114 553-558
  • 5 Reber G, Tincani A, Sanmarco M, de Moerloose P, Boffa M C. Proposals for the measurement of anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies. Standardization group of the European Forum on Antiphospholipid Antibodies.  J Thromb Haemost. 2004;  2 1860-1862
  • 6 Tincani A, Allegri F, Sanmarco M et al.. Anticardiolipin antibody assay: a methodological analysis for a better consensus in routine determination – an operative project of the European Antiphospholipid Forum.  Thromb Haemost. 2001;  86 575-583
  • 7 Balestrieri G, Tincani A, Spatola L et al.. Anti-beta2glycoprotein I antibodies. A marker of antiphospholipid syndrome?.  Lupus. 1995;  4 122-130
  • 8 Capuano F, Grasso V, Belforte L et al.. Development of automated assays for anticardiolipin antibodies determination: addressing antigen and standardization issues.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;  1109 493-502
  • 9 Iverson G M, von Mühlen C A, Staub H L, Lassen A J, Binder W, Norman G L. Patients with atherosclerotic syndrome, negative in anti-cardiolipin assays, make IgA autoantibodies that preferentially target domain 4 of beta2-GPI.  J Autoimmun. 2006;  27 266-271
  • 10 de Laat B, Derksen R H, Urbanus R T, de Groot P G. IgG antibodies that recognize epitope Gly40-Arg43 in domain I of beta2-glycoprotein I cause LAC, and their presence correlates strongly with thrombosis.  Blood. 2005;  105 1540-1545
  • 11 de Laat B, Wu X X, van Lummel M, Derksen R H, de Groot P G, Rand J H. Correlation between antiphospholipid antibodies that recognize domain I of beta2-glycoprotein I and a reduction in the anticoagulant activity of annexin A5.  Blood. 2007;  109 1490-1494
  • 12 Favaloro E J, Wong R C, Silvestrini R, McEvoy R, Jovanovich S, Roberts-Thomson P. A multilaboratory peer assessment quality assurance program-based evaluation of anticardiolipin antibody, and beta2-glycoprotein I antibody testing.  Semin Thromb Hemost. 2005;  31 73-84
  • 13 Sanmarco M, Bardin N, Blank M et al.. Heterogenity for anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies. A factor of variability in test results.  Thromb Haemost. 2005;  93 80-87
  • 14 Reber G, Tincani A, Sanmarco M, de Moerloose P, Boffa M C. European Forum on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Standardization Group . Variability of anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies measurement by commercial assays.  Thromb Haemost. 2005;  94 665-672
  • 15 Cavazzana A, Ruffatti A, Tonello M, Bortolati M, De Moerloose P, Reber G. An analysis of experimental conditions influencing the anti-beta2-glycoprotein I ELISA assay results.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;  1109 484-492

Angela TincaniM.D. 

Associate Professor of Rheumatology, Spedali Civili and University of Brescia

Piazzale Spedali Civili, 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy

eMail: tincani@bresciareumatologia.it