The Detection of Macrosomia at a Teaching Hospital

ABSTRACT

We sought to determine the detection (clinical or sonographic) rate of macrosomic newborns (at least 4000 g) and the peripartum factors among those who were or were not identified accurately. We retrospectively reviewed all deliveries over 1 year and all maternal and neonatal charts of macrosomic newborns delivered during that year. Odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Over a 12-month period, the rate of macrosomia was 10% (421/4194) and of those, only 11% (95% CI 8 to 14%) were suspected clinically or sonographically. None of the newborns weighing 4500 g or more were recognized before birth (0/57; 95% CI 0 to 6%). The rate of cesarean delivery was significantly higher among newborns correctly identified as macrosomic (58%) versus those missed (36%; OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.46, 5.16). The incidence of newborns weighing in excess of 4000 g is 10%, and ~90% of these macrosomic newborns were unsuspected before birth.

Macrosomia - estimate of birth weight

REFERENCES

• 1 Chauhan S P, Grobman W A, Gherman R A et al.. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  193 332-346
• 2 Boulet S L, Alexander G R, Salihu H, Pass M A. Macrosomic birth in the United States: determinant, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  188 1372-1378
• 3 Gillean J R, Coonrod D V, Russ R, Bay R C. Big infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  192 1948-1955
• 4 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists .Fetal macrosomia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 22. Washington DC; ACOG 2000
• 5 Gonen R, Bader D, Ajami M. Effects of policy of elective cesarean delivery in cases of suspected macrosomia on the incidence of brachial plexus injury and the rate of cesarean delivery.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  183 1296-1300
• 6 Gonen R, Spiegel D, Abend M. Is macrosomia predictable, and are shoulder dystocia and birth trauma preventable?.  Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  88 526-529
• 7 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists .Ultrasonography in pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 58. Washington DC; ACOG 2004
• 8 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists .Gestational Diabetes. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 30. Washington DC; ACOG 2001
• 9 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists .Dystocia and augmentation of labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 49. Washington DC; ACOG 2003
• 10 Poggi S H, Ghidini A, Allen R H, Pezzullo J C, Rosenbaum T C, Spong C Y. Effect of operative vaginal delivery on the outcome of permanent brachial plexus injury.  J Reprod Med. 2003;  48 692-696
• 11 Chauhan S P, Hendrix N W, Magann E F, Morrison J C, Kenney S P, Devoe L D. Limitation of clinical and sonographic estimate of birth weight: experience with 1034 parturients.  Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  91 72-77
• 12 Weeks J W, Pitman T, Spinnato II J A. Fetal macrosomia: does antenatal prediction affect delivery route and birth outcome?.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;  173 1215-1219
• 13 Conway D L, Langer O. Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean delivery.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  178 922-925
• 14 Gherman R B, Chauhan S, Ouzounian J G, Lerner H, Gonik B, Goodwin M. Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;  195 657-672
• 15 Ong H C, Sen D K. Clinical estimation of fetal weight.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;  112 877-880
• 16 Zhang X, Decker A, Platt R W, Kramer M S. How big is too big? The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;  198 517 e1-6