Accuracy of the Velotron Ergometer and SRM Power Meter

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the Velotron cycle ergometer and the SRM power meter using a dynamic calibration rig over a range of exercise protocols commonly applied in laboratory settings. These trials included two sustained constant power trials (250 W and 414 W), two incremental power trials and three high-intensity interval power trials. To further compare the two systems, 15 subjects performed three dynamic 30 km performance time trials. The Velotron and SRM displayed accurate measurements of power during both constant power trials (<1% error). However, during high-intensity interval trials the Velotron and SRM were found to be less accurate (3.0%, CI=1.6–4.5% and −2.6%, CI=−3.2–−2.0% error, respectively). During the dynamic 30 km time trials, power measured by the Velotron was 3.7±1.9% (CI=2.9–4.8%) greater than that measured by the SRM. In conclusion, the accuracy of the Velotron cycle ergometer and the SRM power meter appears to be dependent on the type of test being performed. Furthermore, as each power monitoring system measures power at various positions (i.e. bottom bracket vs. rear wheel), caution should be taken when comparing power across the two systems, particularly when power is variable.

cycling - power - calibration - training - testing

References

• 1 Abbiss CR, Levin G, MacGuigan MR, Laursen PB. Reliability of power output during dynamic cycling.  Int J Sports Med. 2007;  , Epub ahead of print
• 2 Balmer J, Bird S, Davison RCR, Doherty M, Smith P. Mechanically braked Wingate powers: agreement between SRM, corrected and conventional methods of measurement.  J Sports Sci. 2004;  22 661-667
• 3 Balmer J, Davison RC, Coleman DA, Bird SR. The validity of power output recorded during exercise performance tests using a Kingcycle air-braked cycle ergometer when compared with an SRM powermeter.  Int J Sports Med. 2000;  21 195-199
• 4 Bertucci W, Duc S, Villerius V, Grappe F. Validity and reliability of the Axiom PowerTrain cycle ergometer when compared with an SRM powermeter.  Int J Sports Med. 2005;  26 59-65
• 5 Bertucci W, Duc S, Villerius V, Pernin JN, Grappe F. Validity and reliability of the PowerTap mobile cycling powermeter when compared with the SRM Device.  Int J Sports Med. 2005;  26 868-873
• 6 Earnest CP, Wharton RP, Church TS, Lucia A. Reliability of the Lode Excalibur Sport Ergometer and applicability to Computrainer electromagnetically braked cycling training device.  J Strength Cond Res. 2005;  19 344-348
• 7 Finn JP, Maxwell BF, Withers RT. Air-braked cycle ergometers: validity of the correction factor for barometric pressure.  Int J Sports Med. 2000;  21 488-491
• 8 Gardner AS, Stephens S, Martin DT, Lawton E, Lee H, Jenkins D. Accuracy of SRM and powertap power monitoring systems for bicycling.  Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2004;  36 1252-1258
• 9 Jensen K, Johansen L. Reproducibility and validity of physiological parameters measured in cyclists riding on racing bikes placed on a stationary magnetic brake.  Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1998;  8 1-6
• 10 MacIntosh BR, Bryan SN, Rishaug P, Norris SR. Evaluation of the Monark Wingate ergometer by direct measurement of resistance and velocity.  Can J Appl Physiol. 2001;  26 543-558
• 11 Martin JC, Gardner AS, Barras M, Martin DT. Modeling sprint cycling using field-derived parameters and forward integration.  Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2006;  38 592-597
• 12 Maxwell BF, Withers RT, Ilsley AH, Wakim MJ, Woods GF, Day L. Dynamic calibration of mechanically, air- and electromagnetically braked cycle ergometers.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1998;  78 346-352
• 13 Millet GP, Tronche C, Fuster N, Bentley DJ, Candau R. Validity and reliability of the Polar S710 mobile cycling powermeter.  Int J Sports Med. 2003;  24 156-161
• 14 Palmer GS, Dennis SC, Noakes TD, Hawley JA. Assessment of the reproducibility of performance testing on an air-braked cycle ergometer.  Int J Sports Med. 1996;  17 293-298
• 15 Paton CD, Hopkins WG. Ergometer error and biological variation in power output in a performance test with three cycle ergometers.  Int J Sports Med. 2006;  27 444-447
• 16 Paton CD, Hopkins WG. Tests of cycling performance.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 489-496
• 17 Smith MF, Davison RC, Balmer J, Bird SR. Reliability of mean power recorded during indoor and outdoor self-paced 40 km cycling time-trials.  Int J Sports Med. 2001;  22 270-274
• 18 Woods GF, Day L, Withers RT, Ilsley AH, Maxwell BF. The dynamic calibration of cycle ergometers.  Int J Sports Med. 1994;  15 168-171

Correspondence