The Role of Strength Training in Speech Sound Disorders

ABSTRACT

Strengthening of the articulators is commonly used to help children improve sound production accuracy, even though the relationship between weakness and speech function remains unclear. Clinicians considering the use of strength training must weigh both the theoretical foundations and the evidence supporting this practice. Widely accepted principles of strength training are available to guide the evaluation of strength training programs. Training specificity requires that exercises closely match the targeted functional outcome. The exercises must overload the muscles beyond their typical use, and this overload must be systematically progressed over time. Finally, the strength training program must incorporate adequate time between exercise sessions to allow for recovery. The available research does not support the position that nonspeech oral motor exercises (NSOMEs) targeting increased strength is beneficial for improving speech accuracy. An example of a speech-based strengthening program is provided to illustrate how appropriate training principles could lead to more positive outcomes. A much larger body of research is needed to determine the conditions under which strength training is most appropriately applied in the treatment of childhood speech disorders.

articulation - strength training - NSOMEs - intervention

REFERENCES

• 1 Lof G, Watson M. A nation-wide survey of non-speech oral motor exercise use: implications for evidence-based practice.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2008;  39 392-407
• 2 DePaul R, Brooks B R. Multiple orofacial indices in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  J Speech Hear Res. 1993;  36(6) 1158-1167
• 3 Solomon N P, Robin D A, Luschei E S. Strength, endurance, and stability of the tongue and hand in Parkinson disease.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;  43(1) 256-267
• 4 Chigara A, Omoto K, Mukai Y, Kaneko Y. Lip closing pressure in disabled children: a comparison with normal children.  Dysphagia. 1994;  9 193-198
• 5 Rosenfeld-Johnson S. Oral Motor Exercises for Speech Clarity. Tuscon, AZ; Ravenhawk 2001
• 6 Gangale D C. The Source for Oral-Facial Exercises. East Moline, IL; LinguiSystems 2001
• 7 Kuehn D P, Moon J B. Induced fatigue effects on velopharyngeal closure force.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;  43 486-500
• 8 Barlow S M. Handbook of Clinical Speech Physiology. San Diego, CA; Singular Thomson Learning 1999
• 9 Solomon N P, Clark H M, Makashay M J, Newman L A. Orofacial strength and speech in normal and disordered adults. Paper presented at: Conference on Motor Speech Monterey, CA; 2008
• 10 Sudberry A, Wilson E, Broaddus T, Potter N. Tongue strength in preschool children: measures, implications, and revelations. Paper presented at: Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Miami Beach, FL; 2006
• 11 Luschei E S. Development of objective standards of nonspeech oral strength and performance. In: Moore CA, Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR Dysarthria and Apraxia of Speech. Baltimore, MD; Paul H. Brookes 1991: 3-13
• 12 Solomon N P. Assessment of tongue weakness and fatigue.  Int J Orofacial Myology. 2004;  30 8-19
• 13 Clark H M, Solomon N P, O'Brien K, Calleja A, Newcomb S. Lingual and buccal strength: innovations in clinical assessment. Paper presented at: Conference on Motor Speech Monterey, CA; 2008
• 14 Robin D A, Somodi L B, Luschei E S. Measurement of tongue strength and endurance in normal and articulation disordered subjects. In: Moore C, Yorkston K, Beukelman D Dysarthria and Apraxia of Speech: Perspectives on Management. Baltimore, MD; Paul H. Brookes 1991
• 15 Murdoch B E, Attard M D, Ozanne A E, Stokes P D. Impaired tongue strength and endurance in developmental verbal dyspraxia: a physiological analysis.  Eur J Disord Comm. 1995;  30 51-64
• 16 Neel A, Palmer P, Gass C. Can the IOPI be used to measure tongue pressure for speech sounds? Paper presented at: Conference on Motor Speech Monterey, CA; 2008
• 17 Arnold P, Gentry M. Strength training: what the team physician needs to know.  Curr Sports Med Rep. 2005;  4(6) 305-308
• 18 Kisner C, Colby L A. Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations and Techniques. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA; FA Davis 1996
• 19 Cerny F, Sapienza C, Lof G, Robbins J. Muscle training principles and resulting changes to speech and swallowing. Paper presented at: Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Boston, MA; 2007
• 20 Bennett R L. Principles of therapeutic exercise. In: Licht S Therapeutic Exercise. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT; Licht & Johnson 1961: 472-485
• 21 Bunton K. Speech vs nonspeech: Different tasks, different neural organization.  Semin Speech Lang. 2008;  29 267-275
• 22 Jones N L, McCartney M, McComas A J. Human Muscle Power. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 1986
• 23 Schmidt R A, Wrisberg C A. Motor Learning and Performance: A Problem Based Learning Approach. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 2000
• 24 Schmidt R A, Lee T D. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 1998
• 25 Fontani G, Migliorini S, Benocci R et al.. Effect of mental imagery on the development of skilled motor actions.  Percept Mot Skills. 2007;  105(3 Pt 1) 803-826
• 26 Gabriel D A, Kamen G, Frost G. Neural adaptations to resistive exercise: mechanisms and recommendations for training practices.  Sports Med. 2006;  36(2) 133-149
• 27 Ranganathan V K, Siemionow V, Liu J Z, Sahgal V, Yue G H. From mental power to muscle power—gaining strength by using the mind.  Neuropsychologia. 2004;  42(7) 944-956
• 28 Hakkinen K, Newton R U, Gordon S E et al.. Changes in muscle morphology, electromyographic activity, and force production characteristics during progressive strength training in young and older men.  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998;  53(6) B415-B423
• 29 Hiatt W R, Regensteiner J G, Wolfel E E, Carry M R, Brass E P. Effect of exercise training on skeletal muscle histology and metabolism in peripheral arterial disease.  J Appl Physiol. 1996;  81(2) 780-788
• 30 Barlow S M, Burton M K. Ramp-and-hold force control in the upper and lower lips: developing new neuromotor assessment applications in traumatically brain injured adults.  J Speech Hear Res. 1990;  33 660-675
• 31 DeLorme T L. Progressive Resistance Exercise. Norwalk, CT; Appleton-Century-Crofts 1951
• 32 Clark H M, Barber W D, Irwin W. Specificity of training in the lingual musculature. Paper presented at: Conference on Motor Speech 2004 Albuquerque, NM;
• 33a Kisner C, Colby L A. Resistance exercises. In: Kisner C, Colby LA Therapeutic Exercise Foundations and Techniques. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA; FA Davis 1996: 56-110
• 33b Clark H M, O'Brien K, Calleja A, Newcomb S. Effects of directional exercise on lingual strength.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;  , in press
• 34 Robbins J, Kays S A, Gangnon R E et al.. The effects of lingual exercise in stroke patients with dysphagia.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;  88(2) 150-158
• 35 Robbins J, Gangnon R E, Theis S M et al.. The effects of lingual exercise on swallowing in older adults.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;  53(9) 1483-1489
• 36 Lazarus C, Logemann J A, Huang C F, Rademaker A W. Effects of two types of tongue strengthening exercises in young normals.  Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2003;  55(4) 199-205
• 37 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association .Evidence-based practice in communication disorders [Position statement]. 2005 http://www.asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default
• 38 Arvedson J C, Clark H M, Lazarus C et al.. The effectiveness of oral-motor exercises: an evidence-based systematic review. Paper presented at: Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Boston, MA; 2007
• 39 Guisti Braislin M A, Cascella P W. A preliminary investigation of the efficacy of oral motor exercises for children with mild articulation disorders.  Int J Rehabil Res. 2005;  28(3) 263-266
• 40 Strode R, Chamberlain C. Easy Does It for Articulation: An Oral Motor Approach. East Moline, IL; LinguiSystems 1997
• 41 Colone E, Forrest K. Comparison of treatment efficacy for persistent speech sound disorders. Paper presented at: Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Washington, DC; 2000
• 42 Occhino C, McCane J. Do oral motor exercises affect articulation?. Paper presented at: Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association New Orleans, LA; 2001
• 43 Abrahamsen E, Flack L. Do sensory and motor techniques improve accurate phoneme production?. Paper presented at: Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Atlanta, GA; 2002
• 44 Bush C, Steger M, Mann-Kahris S, Insalaco D. Equivocal results of oral motor treatment of a child's articulation. Paper presented at: Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Philadelphia, PA; 2004
• 45 Fields D, Polmanteer K. Effectiveness of oral motor techniques in articulation and phonology treatment. Paper presented at: Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Atlanta, GA; 2002
• 46 Lass N J, Pannbacker M. The application of evidence-based practice to nonspeech oral motor treatments.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2008;  39(3) 408-421
• 47 Ruscello D M. An examination of non-speech oral motor exercises for children with velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI).  Semin Speech Lang. 2008;  29 294-303
• 48 Clark H M. Neuromuscular treatments for speech and swallowing: a tutorial.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003;  12 400-415
• 49 Ballard K J. Principles of motor learning and treatment for AOS.  Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders. 2001;  11(4) 13-18
• 50 Marshalla P. Oral motor treatment vs. non-speech oral motor exercises.  Oral Motor Institute. 2008;  2(2)
• 51 Kuehn D P. New therapy for treating hypernasal speech using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;  88 959-966
• 52 Kuehn D P, Imrey P B, Tomes L et al.. Efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of hypernasality.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;  39 267-276
• 53 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association .Code of ethics. 2003. http://Available at: www.asha.org/policy Accessed November 10, 2008
• 54 Gonnella C. Single-subject experimental paradigm as a clinical decision tool.  Phys Ther. 1989;  69(7) 601-609