ABSTRACT
A great deal of information is available to help clinicians understand the principles of motor speech learning and control, and how to apply those principles to clinical practice. In addition, the results of many investigations have documented the differences between the motor movements for speech and nonspeech tasks. Finally, supporting evidence for using nonspeech tasks to improve speech is virtually nonexistent. All of that information, taken in concert, casts doubt on the use of nonspeech techniques for improving children's speaking skills. However, clinicians have available a variety of viable intervention techniques to help children improve speech productions. This article presents a summary of reasons not to use nonspeech remediation techniques along with suggestions clinicians should consider when choosing intervention procedures for children with speech sound errors.
KEYWORDS
Controversial treatment practices - evidence-based practice (EBP) - phonological intervention
REFERENCES
-
1 Controversy. In: Merriam-Webster dictionary online. Available at: http://www.merriam-webster.com/ Accessed August 8, 2008
-
2
Lof G L.
Introduction: controversies surrounding non-speech oral motor exercises for childhood speech disorders.
Semin Speech Lang.
2008;
29
-
3
Lof G L, Watson M.
A nationwide survey of non-speech oral motor exercise use: implications for evidence-based practice.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch.
2008;
39
392-407
-
4
Clark H.
Neuromuscular treatments for speech and swallowing: a tutorial.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol.
2003;
12
400-415
-
5
Maas E, Robin D E, Hula S NA, Freedman S E, Ballard K, Schmidt R A.
Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol.
2008;
17
277-298
-
6
Bunton K.
Speech versus nonspeech: different tasks, different neural organization.
Semin Speech Lang.
2008;
29
267-275
-
7
Clark K.
The role of strength training in speech sound disorders.
Semin Speech Lang.
2008;
29
276-283
-
8
Ruscello D.
An examination of non-speech oral motor exercises for children with velopharyngeal inadequacy.
Semin Speech Lang.
2008;
29
294-303
-
9
McCauley R J, Strand E A.
Treatment of childhood apraxia of speech: clinical decision making in the use of nonspeech oral motor exercises.
Semin Speech Lang.
2008;
29
284-293
-
10
Wilson E, Green J, Yunusova Y Y, Moore C.
Task specificity in early oral motor development.
Semin Speech Lang.
2008;
29
257-266
-
11
Forrest K, Iuzzini J.
A comparison of oral motor and production training for children with speech sound disorders.
Semin Speech Lang.
2008;
29
304-311
-
12
Duchan J, Calculator S, Sonnenmeier R, Diehl S, Cumley D.
A framework for managing controversial practices.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch.
2001;
32
133-141
-
13 Colone E, Forrest K. Comparison of treatment efficacy for persistent speech sound disorders. Paper presented at: annual meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association November 2000 Washington, DC;
-
14
Guisti Braislin M A, Cascella P W.
A preliminary investigation of the efficacy of oral motor exercises for children with mild articulation disorders.
Int J Rehabil Res.
2005;
28
263-266
-
15
Finn P, Bothe A K, Bramlett R.
Science and pseudoscience in communication disorders: criteria and applications.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol.
2005;
14
172-186
-
16
Kamhi A.
A meme's-eye view of nonspeech oral motor exercises.
Semin Speech Lang.
2008;
29
331-338
-
17
Apel K.
Checks and balances: keeping the science in our profession.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch.
1999;
30
98-107
-
18
Tyler A.
What works: evidence-based intervention for children with speech sound disorders.
Semin Speech Lang.
2008;
29
320-330
-
19
Davis B, Velleman S.
Establishing a basic speech repertoire without using NSOMEs: Means, motive, and opportunity.
Semin Speech Lang.
2008;
29
312-319
-
20 Watson M, Lof G. Phonological and articulatory processes in children: survey of universities' teaching, oral motor exercises and other procedures. Paper presented at: national convention of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association November 2005 San Diego, CA;
-
21
Zipoli R P, Kennedy M.
Evidence-based practice among speech-language pathologists: attitudes, utilization, and barriers.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol.
2005;
14
208-220
-
22
Brackenbury T, Burrough E, Hewitt L.
A qualitative examination of current guidelines for evidence-based practice in child language intervention.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch.
2008;
39
78-88
Gregory L LofPh.D.
MGH Institute of Health Professions
36 First Avenue, Boston, MA 02129
Email: glof@mghihp.edu
