Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background and study aims: The variable stiffness colonoscope (VSC) may have theoretical advantages over standard adult colonoscopes (SACs), though data are conflicting. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacies of the VSC and SAC.

Study design: We searched Medline (1966 – 2008) and abstracts of gastroenterology scientific meetings in the 5 years to February 2008, only for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of adult patients. Trial quality was assessed using the Delphi list. In a meta-analysis with a fixed effects model, cecal intubation rates, cecal intubation times, abdominal pain scores, sedation used, and use of ancillary maneuvers, were compared in separate analyses, using weighted mean differences (WMDs), standardized mean differences (SMDs), or odds ratios (ORs).

Results: Seven RCTs satisfied the inclusion criteria (1923 patients), four comparing VSC with SAC procedures in adults, and three evaluating the pediatric VSC. There was no significant heterogeneity among the studies. The overall trial quality was adequate. Cecal intubation rate was higher with the use of VSC (OR = 2.08, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.29 to 3.36). The VSC was associated with lower abdominal pain scores and a decreased need for sedation during colonoscopy. Cecal intubation time was similar for the two colonscope types (WMD = – 0.21 minutes, 95 % CI – 0.85 to 0.43). Because of the nature of the intervention no studies were blinded. There was no universal method for using the VSC.

Conclusions: Compared with the SAC, VSC use was associated with a higher cecal intubation rate, less abdominal pain, and decreased need for sedation. However, cecal intubation times were similar for the two colonoscope types.

References

• 1 Rathgaber S W, Wick T M. Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 556-562
• 2 Mitchell R M, McCallion K, Gardiner K R. et al . Successful colonoscopy; completion rates and reasons for incompletion.  Ulster Med J. 2002;  71 34-37
• 3 Saifuddin T, Trivedi M, King P D. et al . Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 314-317
• 4 Ginsberg G G. Colonoscopy with the variable stiffness colonoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 579-584
• 5 Verhagen A P, de Vet H C, de Bie R A. et al . The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus.  J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;  51 1235-1241
• 6 Kaffes A J, Mishra A, Ding S L. et al . A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 685-689
• 7 Rex D K. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 60-64
• 8 Odori T, Goto H, Arisawa T. et al . Clinical results and development of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 65-69
• 9 Al-Shurieki S H, Marshall J B. Is the variable-stiffness paediatric colonoscope more effective than a standard adult colonoscope for outpatient adult colonoscopy? A randomised controlled trial.  Dig Liver Dis. 2005;  37 698-704
• 10 Brooker J C, Saunders B P, Shah S G. et al . A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial.  Gut. 2000;  46 801-805
• 11 Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M. et al . Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.  American J Gastroenterology. 2002;  99 1936-1940
• 12 Yoshikawa I, Honda H, Nagata K. et al . Variable stiffness colonoscopes are associated with less pain during colonoscopy in unsedated patients.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 3052-3055
• 13 Shumaker D A, Zaman A, Katon R M. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 112-179
• 14 Sorbi D, Schleck C D, Zinsmeister A R. et al . Clinical application of a new colonoscope with variable insertion tube rigidity: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 638-642
• 15 Lee D W, Li S AC, Ko C W. et al . Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 424-429
• 16 Rodriguez S A, Ormseth E, Tsuchida A. Bowel perforation with the variable stiffness colonoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 271-273
• 17 Shah S G, Thomas-Gibson S, Lockett M. et al . Effect of real-time magnetic endoscope imaging on the teaching and acquisition of colonoscopy skills: results from a single trainee.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 421-425
• 18 Shah S G, Brooker J C, Williams C B. et al . The variable stiffness colonoscope: assessment of efficacy by magnetic endoscope imaging.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 195-201
• 19 Howell D A, Ku P M, Desilets D J. A comparative trial of variable stiffness colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 AB52-AB58