Kardiologie up2date 2009; 5(3): 273-283
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215075
Bildgebung und interventionelle Techniken

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Medikamentöse Therapie nach Koronarinterventionen

Tobias  Geisler, Andreas  E.  May, Meinrad  Gawaz
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 October 2009 (online)

Abstract

Guideline-orientated medical treatment plays a decisive role for peri-interventional and longterm prognosis of patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease undergoing coronary intervention. Besides effective antiplatelet therapy, treatment with beta-blockers, statins, ACE-Inhibitors and AT1-Antagonists has a relevant impact on further outcome in certain risk groups and is underrepresented in real-world clinical practise. Since atherosclerosis represents a dynamic process outlasting coronary intervention, sustaining treatment of modifiable risk factors is of high importance. In most cases primary presentation for PCI represent the first and only chance for the interventional cardiologist to optimize medical treatment und thus improving cardiovascular prognosis. The aim of the present article is to give an overview over concomitant medical treatment strategies in patients undergoing coronary intervention and to discuss their role for cardiovascular prognosis in the context of current studies and evidence base guidelines.

Kernaussagen

  • Eine leitliniengerechte medikamentöse Therapie ist von entscheidender Bedeutung für die periinterventionelle und langfristige Prognose bei Patienten mit symptomatischer KHK und Koronareingriff.

  • Dabei kommt neben der effektiven antithrombozytären Therapie einer Behandlung mit Betablockern, CSE-Hemmern, ACE-Inhibitoren bzw. AT1-Antagonisten in bestimmten Risikogruppen eine entscheidene Bedeutung zu und ist in der „real-world practise” zum Teil unterrepräsentiert.

  • Da die Artherosklerose auch über die Intervention hinaus einem dynamischen Prozess unterliegt, ist eine nachhaltige Modifikation behandelbarer Risikofaktoren wichtig. In vielen Fällen ergibt sich erst durch die primäre Vorstellung zur Koronarintervention die Möglichkeit, das kardiovaskuläre Risikoprofil durch die medikamentöse Optimierung präventiv und nachhaltig zu beeinflussen und neben dem eigentlichen Koronareingriff auch hierdurch die Prognose des Patienten entscheidend zu verbessern.

Literatur

  • 1 King 3rd S B, Smith Jr S C, Hirshfeld Jr J W. et al . 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Writing on Behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee.  Circulation. 2008;  117 261-295
  • 2 Boden W E, O"Rourke R A, Teo K K. et al . Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  356 1503-1516
  • 3 Schömig A, Mehilli J, de Waha A. et al . A meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials of a percutaneous coronary intervention-based strategy in patients with stable coronary artery disease.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;  52 894-904
  • 4 Jaber W A, Lennon R J, Mathew V. et al . Application of evidence-based medical therapy is associated with improved outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and is a valid quality indicator.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;  46 1473-1478
  • 5 Steinberg B A, Steg P G, Bhatt D L;. et al . Comparisons of guideline-recommended therapies in patients with documented coronary artery disease having percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting versus medical therapy only (from the REACH International Registry).  Am J Cardiol. 2007;  99 1212-1215
  • 6 Silber S, Borggrefe M, Böhm M. et al . Positionspapier der DGK zur Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von Medikamente freisetzenden Koronarstents (DES) – Eine evidenzbasierte Analyse von 71 randomisierten Studien mit 28 984 Patienten.  Der Kardiologe. 2007;  1 84-111
  • 7 May A E, Geisler T, Gawaz M. Individualized antithrombotic therapy in high risk patients after coronary stenting. A double-edged sword between thrombosis and bleeding.  Thromb Haemost. 2008;  99 487-493
  • 8 Geisler T, Grass D, Bigalke B. et al . The Residual Platelet Aggregation after Deployment of Intracoronary Stent (PREDICT) score.  J Thromb Haemost. 2008;  6 54-61
  • 9 Mega J L, Close S L, Wiviott S D. et al . Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel.  N Engl J Med. 2009;  360 354-362
  • 10 Patrono C, Bachmann F, Baigent C. et al . Expert Consensus Document on the Use of Antiplatelet Agents. The Task Force on the Use of Antiplatelet Agents in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease of the European Society of Cardiology.  Eur Heart J. 2004;  25 1-16
  • 11 Antithrombotic Trialists" Collaboration . Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients.  BMJ. 2002;  324 71-86
  • 12 Bertrand M E, Legrand V, Boland J. et al . Randomized multicenter comparison of conventional anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in unplanned and elective coronary stenting. The full anticoagulation versus aspirin and ticlopidine (fantastic) study.  Circulation. 1998;  98 1597-1603
  • 13 Urban P, Macaya C, Rupprecht H J. et al . Randomized evaluation of anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation in high-risk patients: the multicenter aspirin and ticlopidine trial after intracoronary stenting (MATTIS).  Circulation. 1998;  98 2126-2132
  • 14 Moussa I, Oetgen M, Roubin G. et al . Effectiveness of clopidogrel and aspirin versus ticlopidine and aspirin in preventing stent thrombosis after coronary stent implantation.  Circulation. 1999;  99 2364-2366
  • 15 Mehta S R, Yusuf S, Peters R J. et al . Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study.  Lancet. 2001;  358 527-533
  • 16 Steinhubl S R, Berger P B, Mann 3rd J T . Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA. 2002;  288 2411-2420
  • 17 Brandt J T, Payne C D, Wiviott S D. et al . A comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel loading doses on platelet function: magnitude of platelet inhibition is related to active metabolite formation.  Am Heart J. 2007;  153 9266-9316
  • 18 Wiviott S D, Braunwald E, McCabe C H. et al . Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  357 2001-2015
  • 19 Mehta R H, Harjai K J, Grines L. et al . Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) Investigators. Sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory among patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predictors, and outcomes.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;  43 1765-1772
  • 20 Sung C P, Arleth A J, Eichman C. et al . Carvedilol, a multiple-action neurohumoral antagonist, inhibits mitogen-activated protein kinase and cell cycle progression in vascular smooth muscle cells.  J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;  283 910-917
  • 21 Jackson J D, Muhlestein J B, Bunch T J. et al.; . Beta-blockers reduce the incidence of clinical restenosis: prospective study of 4840 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization.  Am Heart J. 2003;  145 875-881
  • 22 Kernis S J, Harjai K J, Stone G W. et al . Does beta-blocker therapy improve clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction after successful primary angioplasty?.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;  43 1773-1779
  • 23 Gottlieb S S, McCarter R J. Comparative effects of three beta-blockers (atenolol, metoprolol and propranolol) on survival after acute myocardial infarction.  Am J Cardiol. 2001;  87 823-826
  • 24 Notarbartolo A, Davì G, Averna M. et al . Inhibition of thromboxane biosynthesis and platelet function by simvastatin in type IIa hypercholesterolemia.  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;  15 247-251
  • 25 Lacoste L, Lam J Y, Hung J. et al . Hyperlipidemia and coronary disease. Correction of the increased thrombogenic potential with cholesterol reduction.  Circulation. 1995;  92 3172-3177
  • 26 Dupuis J, Tardif J C, Cernacek P. et al . Cholesterol reduction rapidly improves endothelial function after acute coronary syndromes. The RECIFE (reduction of cholesterol in ischemia and function of the endothelium) trial.  Circulation. 1999;  99 3227-3233
  • 27 Pasceri V, Patti G, Nusca A. et al.; . Randomized trial of atorvastatin for reduction of myocardial damage during coronary intervention: results from the ARMYDA (Atorvastatin for Reduction of Myocardial Damage during Angioplasty) study.  Circulation. 2004;  110 674-678
  • 28 Ray K K, Cannon C P, McCabe C H. et al . Early and late benefits of high-dose atorvastatin in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results from the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;  46 1405-1410
  • 29 Geisler T, Zürn C, Paterok M. et al . Statins do not adversely affect post-interventional residual platelet aggregation and outcomes in patients undergoing coronary stenting treated by dual antiplatelet therapy.  Eur Heart J. 2008;  29 1635-1643
  • 30 Daemen M J, Lombardi D M, Bosman F T, Schwartz S M. Angiotensin II induces smooth muscle cell proliferation in the normal and injured rat arterial wall.  Circ Res. 1991;  68 450-456
  • 31 The MARCATOR study group . Effect of high doses of ACE inhibition on restenosis: final results of the MARCATOR study.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;  25 362-369
  • 32 Meurice T, Bauters C, Hermant X. et al . Effect of ACE inhibitors on angiographic restenosis after coronary stenting (PARIS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.  Lancet. 2001;  357 1321-1324
  • 33 Ribichini F, Wijns W, Ferrero V. et al . Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on restenosis after coronary stenting.  Am J Cardiol. 2003;  91 154-158
  • 34 Yanabe T, Mazu M, Yamamoto H. et al . Effect of cilazapril on vascular restenosis after PTCA.  Coron Art Dis. 1995;  8 573-579
  • 35 The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study investigators . Effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high risk patients.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 145-153
  • 36 Kondo J, Sone T, Tsuboi H. et al . Effects of low-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease.  Am Heart J. 2003;  146 E20
  • 37 Yusuf S, Teo K K, Pogue J. ONTARGET Investigators . Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events.  N Engl J Med. 2008;  358 1547-1559

Dr. med. Tobias GeislerMD 

Medizinische Klinik III
Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen
Universitätsklinikum der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen

Otfried-Müller-Straße 10
72076 Tübingen

Email: tobias.geisler@med.uni-tuebingen.de