Endoscopy 2009; 41(11): 1001-1004
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215175
Case report

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Capsule endoscopy for the small bowel in juvenile polyposis syndrome: a case series

A.  J.  Postgate1 [*] , O.  C.  Will1 [*] , C.  H.  Fraser1 , A.  Fitzpatrick1 , R.  K.  S.  Phillips2 , S.  K.  Clark2
  • 1Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark’s Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
  • 2The Polyposis Registry, St. Mark’s Hospital, London, UK
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted16 March 2009

accepted after revision14 July 2009

Publikationsdatum:
08. Oktober 2009 (online)

Preview

Juvenile polyposis syndrome is one of the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes and demonstrates phenotypic heterogeneity. All patients with juvenile polyposis develop colorectal polyps and are at risk of colorectal cancer. Small-bowel involvement is variably described. Small-intestinal cancer is reported but is rare and there is no evidence-based protocol for small-intestinal surveillance. This case series reports the small-bowel capsule endoscopy findings and genetic mutational analyses of ten adults (7-male; median age 39.2 years, interquartile range 37.4 – 42.0 years) with documented juvenile polyposis syndrome. Two patients had small-bowel polyps beyond the range of standard gastroscopy identified at capsule endoscopy: a 6-mm ileal polyp in one, and 10-mm and 6-mm ileal polyps in the second (histology unknown). Duodenal polyps were detected in a third patient at capsule endoscopy. Three further patients had previously documented duodenal polyps at surveillance gastroscopy. A SMAD4 mutation was identified in seven patients but there was no obvious association with gastric/small-bowel polyp burden. In conclusion, capsule endoscopy provided information additional to conventional endoscopy in patients with juvenile polyposis syndrome and was well tolerated. However, no lesions requiring clinical intervention were identified and polyp numbers were small. Capsule endoscopy may appropriately be used as a baseline investigation for the identification of patients with large or dense small-bowel polyps for whom ongoing small-bowel investigation would be recommended. Patients in whom polyps are confined to the colon are unlikely to require ongoing small-bowel review.

References

1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

S. K. ClarkFRCS 

The Polyposis Registry
St. Mark’s Hospital
London

HA1 3UJ
UK

Fax: +44-208-2354278

eMail: sue.clark@nwlh.nhs.uk