Endoscopic ultrasonography

References

• 1 Siddiqui U D, Rossi F, Rosenthal L S. et al . EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  ohne Seitenzahl, DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.05.037
• 2 Itoi T, Itokawa F, Kurihara T. et al . Experimental endoscopy: objective evaluation of EUS needles.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 509-516
• 3 Yusuf T E, Ho S, Pavey D A. et al . Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 445-448
• 4 Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Komaki T. et al . Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  24 384-390
• 5 Nguyen T TH, Lee C E, Whang C S. et al . A comparison of the diagnostic yield and specimen adequacy between 22 and 25 gauge needles for endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic lesions (SPL): is bigger better? [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB100
• 6 Petrov M S, Savides T J. Systematic review of endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis.  Br J Surg. 2009;  ohne Seitenangabe, DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6667
• 7 Polkowski M, Regula J, Tilszer A, Butruk E. Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a randomized trial comparing two management strategies.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 296-303
• 8 Fabbri C, Polifemo A M, Luigiano C. et al . Single session versus separate session endoscopic ultrasonography plus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with low to moderate risk for choledocholithiasis.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  24 1107-1112
• 9 Khalid A, Zahid M, Finkelstein S D. et al . Pancreatic cyst fluid DNA analysis in evaluating pancreatic cysts: a report of the PANDA study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 1095-1102
• 10 Anderson M A, Kwon R S, Scheiman J M. PANDA cyst-fluid analysis: eats, shoots and leaves?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 1103-1105
• 11 Agarwal B, Krishna N B, Labundy J L. et al . EUS and/or EUS-guided FNA in patients with CT and/or magnetic resonance imaging findings of enlarged pancreatic head or dilated pancreatic duct with or without a dilated common bile duct.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  68 237-242
• 12 Ho S, Bonasera R J, Pollack B J. et al . A single-center experience of endoscopic ultrasonography for enlarged pancreas on computed tomography.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  4 98-103
• 13 Singh S, Reddymasu S, Waheed S. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography findings in patients with non-specific changes of the pancreas on computed tomography: a single-center experience.  Dig Dis Sci. 2008;  53 2799-2804
• 14 Horwhat J D, Gerke H, Acosta R D. et al . Focal or diffuse ”fullness” of the pancreas on CT. Usually benign, but EUS plus/minus FNA is warranted to identify malignancy.  JOP. 2009;  10 37-42
• 15 Brenner D J, Hall E J. Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  357 2277-2284
• 16 Vila J J, Jimenez F J, Irisarri R. et al . Prospective observational study of the incidental findings on endoscopic ultrasonography: should a complete exploration always be performed?.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;  44 1139-1145
• 17 Polkowski M, Palucki J, Regula J. et al . Helical computed tomographic cholangiography versus endosonography for suspected bile duct stones: a prospective blinded study in non-jaundiced patients.  Gut. 1999;  45 744-749
• 18 Siemsen M, Svendsen L B, Knigge U. et al . A prospective randomized comparison of curved array and radial echoendoscopy in patients with esophageal cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 671-676