References
-
1 Faigel D O, Baron T H, Lewis B. et al .Ensuring competence in endoscopy. ASGE Press http://Awww.asge.org/nspages/practice/patientcare/competence.pdf
-
2
Barton R.
Accrediting competence in colonoscopy: validity and reliability of the UK Joint Advisory Group/NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Accreditation Assessment.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB77
-
3
Dominitiz J A, Ikenberry S A, Andersomn M A. et al .
Renewal of and proctoring for endoscopic privileges.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
10-16
-
4
Eisen G M, Baron T H, Dominitz J A. et al .
Methods of granting hospital privileges to perform gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
55
780-783
-
5
Armstrong D, Enns R, Ponich T. et al .
Canadian credentialing guidelines for endoscopic privileges: an overview.
Can J Gastroenterol.
2007;
21
797-801
-
6
Bjorkman D J, Popp J W.
Measuring the quality of endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
S1-S2
-
7
Faigel D O, Pike M, Baron T H. et al .
Quality indicators for endoscopic procedures: an introduction.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
S3-S9
Am J Gastroenterol.
2006;
101
866-872
-
8
Cohen J, Cohen S A, Vora K C. et al .
Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
64
361-368
-
9
Ritter E M, McCluskey D A, Gallagher A G. et al .
Perceptual, visuospatial, and psychomotor abilities correlate with duration of training required on a virtual-reality flexible endoscopy simulator.
Am J Surg.
2006;
192
379-384
-
10 European Board of Gastroenterology .The blue book 2008. http://www.eubog.org/docs/Blue_Book.pdf
-
11
Froehlich F, Repond C, Mullhaupt B. et al .
Is the diagnostic yield of upper GI endoscopy improved by the use of explicit panel-based appropriateness criteria?.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2000;
52
333-341
-
12
De Bosset V, Froehlich F, Rey J P. et al .
Do explicit appropriateness criteria enhance the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy?.
Endoscopy.
2002;
34
360-368
-
13
Balaguer F, Llach J, Castells A. et al .
The European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy guidelines colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit: a prospective study.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2005;
21
609-613
-
14
Morini S, Hassan C, Meucci G. et al .
Diagnostic yield of open access colonoscopy according to appropriateness.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
54
175-179
-
15
Bersani G, Rossi A, Ricci G. et al .
Do ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of colonoscopy enhance the probability of finding relevant pathologies in an open access service?.
Dig Liver Dis.
2005;
37
609-614
-
16
Charles R J, Chak A, Cooper G S. et al .
Use of open access in GI endoscopy at an academic medical center.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
50
480-485
-
17
Vargo J J, Holub J L, Faigel D O. et al .
Risk factors for cardiopulmonary events during propofol-mediated upper endoscopy and colonoscopy.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2006;
24
955-963
-
18
Sharma V K, Nguyen C C, Crowell M D. et al .
A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2007;
66
27-34
-
19
Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C. et al .
Prediction of difficult mask ventilation.
Anesthesiology.
2000;
92
1229-1236
-
20
Cotton P B, Eisen G, Vargo J. et al .
A lexicon for adverse events; report of an ASGE workshop.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2009;
In press
-
21
Cohen J, Safdi M A, Deal S E. et al .
Quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
S10-S15
Am J Gastroenterol.
2006;
101
886-891
-
22
Adler D G, Leighton J A, Davila R E. et al .
ASGE guideline: The role of endoscopy in acute non-variceal upper-GI hemorrhage.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2004;
60
497-504
-
23
Ford A, Delaney B, Forman D. et al .
Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori positive patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2004;
18
CD003840
-
24
Eisen G M, Baron T H, Dominitz J A. et al .
The role of endoscopic therapy in the management of variceal hemorrhage.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
56
618-620
-
25
Villanueva C, Colomo A, Aracil C, Guarner C.
Current endoscopic therapy of variceal bleeding.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol.
2008;
22
261-278
-
26
Rex D K, Petrini J L, Baron T H. et al .
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
S16-S28
Am J Gastroenterol.
2006;
101
873-885
-
27
Rex D K, Bond J H, Winawer S. et al .
Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2002;
97
1296-1308
-
28
Barclay R L, Vicari J J, Doughty A S. et al .
Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
N Engl J Med.
2006;
355
2533-2541
-
29
Barclay R L, Vicari J J, Greenlaw R L.
Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2008;
6
1091-1098
-
30
Harewood G C, Sharma V K, de Garmo P.
Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
58
76-79
-
31
Froelich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers J J. et al .
Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European Multicenter Study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
61
378-384
-
32
Baron T H, Petersen B T, Mergener K. et al .
Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
S29-S34
Am J Gastroenterol.
2006;
101
892-897
-
33
Jowell P S.
Quantitative assessment of procedural competence: A prospective study of training in ERCP.
Ann Intern Med.
1996;
125
937-939
-
34
Schlup M M, Williams S M, Barbezat G O.
ERCP: a review of technical competency and workload in a small unit.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1997;
46
48-52
-
35
Freeman M L, Guda N M.
Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2004;
59
845-864
-
36
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy .
Quality improvement of gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
49
842-844.
http://www.asge.org/WorkArea/showcontent.aspx?id=3388
-
37
Brotman M, Allen J I, Bickston S J. et al .
AGA Task Force on Quality in Practice: a national overview and implications for GI practice.
Gastroenterology.
2005;
129
361-369
-
38
Johanson J F, Schmitt C M, Deas T M. et al .
Quality and outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2000;
52
827-830
-
39
Multi-society guidelines for reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
58
1-8.
http://www.asge.org/WorkArea/showcontent.aspx?id=3376
-
40 World Gastroenterology Organisation-OMGE and Organisation Mondiale d’Endoscopie Digestif (OMED) .WGO-OMGE and OMED practice guideline: Endoscope disinfection. http://www.omed.org/downloads/pdf/guidelines/wgo_omed_endoscope_disinfection.pdf
-
41 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy .ASGE Endoscopy Unit Recognition Program. http://www.asge.org/ITTIndex.aspx?id=6254
-
42 Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) .The Global Rating Scale. http://www.grs.nhs.uk
D. O. FaigelMD
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Oregon Health and Science University
3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd (L461)
Portland OR 97239-3098
USA
Fax: 01-503-494-7556
eMail: faigeld@ohsu.edu
