Download PDF
Synlett 2009(15): 2382-2391  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1217828
ACCOUNT
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Developing Continuous-Flow Microreactors as Tools for Synthetic Chemists

Karolin Geyera, Tomas Gustafssona,b, Peter H. Seeberger*a,c
a Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 10, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Fax: +41(44)6331235; e-Mail: seeberger@org.chem.ethz.ch;
b Medicinal Chemistry, AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, 43183 Mölndal, Sweden
c Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Department of Biomolecular Systems, Arnimallee 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany
e-Mail: peter.seeberger@mpikg.mpg.de;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 5 December 2008
Publication Date:
28 August 2009 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Microfluidic devices are emerging as true alternatives to traditional batch processes, as evidenced by recent applications in important synthetic transformations. Besides biologically important oligomers such as β-peptides and oligosaccharides, pharmaceutically active substances have been the target of the most recent investigations. Furthermore, synthetic processes posing challenges to process chemists such as highly exothermic or explosive reactions and reactions that are difficult to control on large scale (such as radical transformations) have been of particular interest. This account briefly introduces the concepts of continuous-flow microreactors, and reviews our investigations on the application of microfluidic devices in synthetic transformations such as glycosylations, amide bond formations mediated by trimethylaluminum, radical-based transformations, and deoxyfluorinations.

1 Introduction

2 Classical Chemical Transformations

2.1 Proof-of-Principle Studies

2.2 Trimethylaluminum-Mediated Amide Bond Formations

2.3 Deoxyfluorinations with (Diethylamino)sulfur Trifluoride

3 Synthesis of Biopolymers

3.1 Synthesis of Carbohydrates

3.1.1 Glycosylation Reactions

3.1.2 Synthesis of Oligosaccharides

3.2 Synthesis of β-Peptides

4 Free-Radical-Based Reactions

4.1 Dehalogenations and Deoxygenations

4.2 Hydrosilylations

5 Conclusions

Key words

microreactors - continuous flow - oligosaccharides - β-peptides - fluorinations - amide bond formation - scale-up

    References

  • 1a Rubin AE. Tummala S. Both DA. Wang C. Delaney E. Chem. Rev.  2006,  106:  2794 
    Google Scholar
  • 1b McKenzie P. Kiang S. Tom J. Rubin AE. Futran M. AIChE J.  2006,  52:  3990 
    Google Scholar
  • For recent reviews and books on microreactor technology, see:
  • 2a Ehrfeld W. Hessel V. Löwe H. Microreactors: New Technology for Modern Chemistry   Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2000. 
    Google Scholar
  • 2b Hessel V. Hardt S. Löwe H. Chemical Micro Process Engineering   Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004. 
    Google Scholar
  • 2c Jähnisch K. Hessel V. Löwe H. Baerns M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2004,  43:  406 
    Google Scholar
  • 2d Watts P. Haswell SJ. Chem. Soc. Rev.  2005,  34:  235 
    Google Scholar
  • 2e Thayer AM. Chem. Eng. News  2005,  83(22):  43 
    Google Scholar
  • 2f Geyer K. Codée JDC. Seeberger PH. Chem. Eur. J.  2006,  12:  8434 
    Google Scholar
  • 2g Brivio M. Verboom W. Reinhoudt DN. Lab Chip  2006,  6:  329 
    Google Scholar
  • 2h Mason BP. Price KE. Steinbacher JL. Bogdan AR. McQuade DT. Chem. Rev.  2007,  107:  2300 
    Google Scholar
  • 2i Ahmed-Omer B. Brandt JC. Wirth T. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2007,  5:  733 
    Google Scholar
  • 2j Kang L. Chung BG. Langer R. Khademhosseini A. Drug Discovery Today  2008,  13:  1 
    Google Scholar
  • 2k Fukuyama T. Rahman T. Sato M. Ryu I. Synlett  2008,  2:  151 
    Google Scholar
  • 2l Wiles C. Watts P. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2008,  10:  1655 
    Google Scholar
  • For recent publications on microreactors in organic synthesis, see:
  • 3a Usutani H. Tomida Y. Nagaki A. Okamoto H. Nokami Y. Yoshida J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2007,  129:  3046 
    Google Scholar
  • 3b Hartung A. Keane MA. Kraft A. J. Org. Chem.  2007,  72:  10235 
    Google Scholar
  • 3c Bula WP. Verboom W. Reinhoudt DN. Gardeniers HJ. Lab Chip  2007,  7:  1717 
    Google Scholar
  • 3d Sahoo HR. Kralj JG. Jensen KF. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2007,  46:  5704 
    Google Scholar
  • 3e Tanaka K. Motomatsu S. Koyama K. Tanaka SI. Fukase K. Org. Lett.  2007,  9:  299 
    Google Scholar
  • 3f Trapp O. Weber SK. Bauch S. Hofstadt W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2007,  46:  7307 
    Google Scholar
  • 3g Fukuyama T. Kobayashi M. Rahman T. Kamata N. Ryu I. Org. Lett.  2008,  10:  433 
    Google Scholar
  • 3h Baumann M. Baxendale IR. Ley SV. Nikbin N. Smith CD. Tierney JP. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2008,  6:  1577 
    Google Scholar
  • 3i Csajági C. Borcsek B. Niesz K. Kovács I. Székelyhidi Z. Bajkó Z. Ürge L. Darvas F. Org. Lett.  2008,  10:  1589 
    Google Scholar
  • For recent examples of microreactor-based transformations from this laboratory, see:
  • 4a Snyder DA. Noti C. Seeberger PH. Schael F. Bieber T. Rimmel G. Ehrfeld W. Helv. Chim. Acta  2005,  88:  1 
    Google Scholar
  • 4b Ratner DM. Murphy ER. Jhunjhunwala M. Snyder DA. Jensen KF. Seeberger PH. Chem. Commun.  2005,  578 
    Google Scholar
  • 4c Flögel O. Codée JDC. Seebach D. Seeberger PH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2006,  45:  7000 
    Google Scholar
  • 4d Geyer K. Seeberger PH. Helv. Chim. Acta  2007,  90:  395 
    Google Scholar
  • 4e Carrel FR. Geyer K. Codée JDC. Seeberger PH. Org. Lett.  2007,  9:  2285 
    Google Scholar
  • 4f Gustafsson T. Pontén F. Seeberger PH. Chem. Commun.  2008,  1100 
    Google Scholar
  • 4g Gustafsson T. Gilmour R. Seeberger PH. Chem. Commun.  2008,  3022 
    Google Scholar
  • 4h Odedra A. Geyer K. Gustafsson T. Gilmour R. Seeberger PH. Chem. Commun.  2008,  3025 
    Google Scholar
  • 4i Odedra A. Seeberger PH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2009,  48:  2699 
    Google Scholar
  • For recent publications on protein digestions using microreactors, see:
  • 5a Liu J. Lin S. Qi D. Deng C. Yang P. Zhang X. J. Chromatogr., A  2007,  1-2:  169 
    Google Scholar
  • 5b Ji J. Zhang Y. Zhou X. Kong J. Tang Y. Liu B. Anal. Chem.  2008,  80:  2457 
    Google Scholar
  • 5c Ma J. Liang Z. Qiao X. Deng Q. Tao D. Zhang L. Zhang Y. Anal. Chem.  2008,  80:  2949 
    Google Scholar
  • 5d Le Nel A. Minc N. Smadja C. Slovakova M. Bilkova Z. Peyrin JM. Viovy JL. Taverna M. Lab Chip  2008,  8:  294 
    Google Scholar
  • For recent publications on PCR using microfluidic devices, see:
  • 6a Charles MC. Sucher NJ. Methods Mol. Biol.  2006,  321:  131 
    Google Scholar
  • 6b Chen L. West J. Auroux PA. Manz A. Day P. J. Anal. Chem.  2007,  79:  9185 
    Google Scholar
  • For recent publications on the synthesis of nanoparticles in continuous flow, see:
  • 7a Yen BK. Günther A. Schmidt MA. Jensen KF. Bawendi MG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2005,  44:  5447 
    Google Scholar
  • 7b Hung LH. Choi KM. Tseng WY. Tan YC. Shea KJ. Lee AI. Lab Chip  2006,  6:  174 
    Google Scholar
  • 7c Yang H. Luan W. Tu ST. Wang ZM. Lab Chip  2008,  8:  451 
    Google Scholar
  • For publications on fluorinations in microreactors, see:
  • 8a Jähnisch KJ. Baerns M. Hessel V. Ehrfeld W. Haverkamp V. Loewe H. Wille C. Guber A. J. Fluorine Chem.  2000,  105:  117 
    Google Scholar
  • 8b Chambers RD. Holling D. Spink RCH. Sandford G. Lab Chip  2001,  1:  132 
    Google Scholar
  • 8c de Mas N. Günther A. Schmidt MA. Jensen KF. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.  2003,  42:  698 
    Google Scholar
  • 8d Chambers RD. Fox MA. Sandford G. Lab Chip  2005,  5:  1132 
    Google Scholar
  • 8e Chambers RD. Sandford G. Trmcic J. Okazoe T. Org. Process Res. Dev.  2008,  12:  339 
    Google Scholar
  • 8f Negi DS. Köppling L. Lovis K. Abdallah R. Budde U. Org. Process Res. Dev.  2008,  12:  345 
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Wheeler RC. Benali O. Deal M. Farrant E. MacDonald JF. Warrington BH. Org. Process Res. Dev.  2007,  11:  704 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • For applications of continuous-flow microreactors on mesoscale, see:
  • 10a Taghavi-Moghadam S. Kleemann A. Golbig KG. Org. Process Res. Dev.  2001,  5:  652 
    Google Scholar
  • 10b Liu S. Fukuyama T. Sato M. Ryu I. Org. Process Res. Dev.  2004,  8:  477 
    Google Scholar
  • 10c Zhang X. Stefanick S. Villani FJ. Org. Process Res. Dev.  2004,  8:  455 
    Google Scholar
  • 10d Acke DRJ. Stevens CV. Org. Process Res. Dev.  2006,  10:  417 
    Google Scholar
  • For publications on on-line analysis in continuous flow by use of IR or Raman spectroscopy, see:
  • 11a Fletcher PD. Haswell SJ. Zhang X. Electrophoresis  2003,  24:  3239 
    Google Scholar
  • 11b Aarnoutse PJ. Westerhuis JA. Anal. Chem.  2005,  77:  1228 
    Google Scholar
  • 11c Barnes SE. Cygan ZT. Yates JK. Beers KL. Amis EJ. Analyst  2006,  131:  1027 
    Google Scholar
  • 11d Pelletier MJ. Fabiilli ML. Moon B. J. Appl. Spectrosc.  2007,  61:  1107 
    Google Scholar
  • 11e Ferstl W. Klahn T. Schweikert W. Billeb G. Schwarzer M. Loebbecke S. Chem. Eng. Technol.  2007,  30:  370 
    Google Scholar
  • 11f Urakawa A. Trachsel F. Rudolf von Rohr P. Baiker A. Analyst  2008,  133:  1352 
    Google Scholar
  • 12a Rathke MW. Howak M. J. Org. Chem.  1985,  50:  2624 
    Google Scholar
  • 12b Simoni D. Invidiata FP. Manfredini S. Ferroni R. Lampronti I. Roberti M. Pollini GP. Tetrahedron Lett.  1997,  38:  2749 
    Google Scholar
  • 12c Schwetlick K. Organikum   Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2002. 
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Basha A. Lipton M. Weinreb SM. Tetrahedron Lett.  1977,  18:  4171 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mickel SJ. Sedelmeier GH. Niederer D. Schuerch F. Grimler D. Koch G. Daeffler R. Osmani A. Hirni A. Schaer K. G amboni R. Bach A. Chaudhary A. Chen S. Chen W. Hu B. Jagoe CT. Kim HY. Kinder FR. Liu Y. Lu Y. McKenna J. Prashad M. Ramsey TM. Repic O. Rogers L. Shieh WC. Wang RM. Waykole L. Org. Process Res. Dev.  2004,  8:  101 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lan R. Liu Q. Fan P. Lin S. Fernando SR. McCallion D. Pertwee R. Makriyannis A. J. Med. Chem.  1999,  42:  769 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16a Müller K. Faeh C. Diederich F. Science  2007,  317:  1881 
    Google Scholar
  • 16b Kirk KL. Org. Process Res. Dev.  2008,  12:  305 
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Singh RP. Shreeve JM. Synthesis  2002,  2561 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Carpino LA. Beyermann M. Wenschuh H. Bienert M. Acc. Chem. Res.  1996,  29:  268 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 O’Hagan D. Chem. Soc. Rev.  2008,  37:  308 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ravida A. Liu XY. Kovacs L. Seeberger PH. Org. Lett.  2006,  8:  1815 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Liu XY. Stocker BL. Seeberger PH. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2006,  128:  3638 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Carrel FR. Seeberger PH. J. Carbohydr. Chem.  2007,  26:  125 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23a Seebach D. Beck AK. Bierbaum DJ. Chem. Biodivers.  2004,  1:  1111 
    Google Scholar
  • 23b Cheng RP. Gellman SH. DeGrado WF. Chem. Rev.  2001,  101:  3219 
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Imamoto T. McCombie SW. Fry A. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis   Vol. 8:  Trost BM. Fleming I. Pergamon; Oxford: 1991.  p.811 and 983 
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Chatgilialoglu C. Chem. Eur. J.  2008,  14:  2310 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kopping B. Chatgilialoglu C. Zhender M. Giese B. J. Org. Chem.  1992,  57:  3994 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar