Cochlear Nerve Action Potential Monitoring with the Microdissector in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery

ABSTRACT

We developed a cochlear nerve action potential (CNAP) monitoring technique using a microdissector and compared the results of CNAP and auditory brainstem response (ABR) monitoring. Thirty-six patients underwent vestibular schwannoma resection via the retrosigmoid approach to preserve hearing. Both CNAP with the microdissector and surface ABR were recorded during the operation. We used the microdissector as an intracranial electrode for CNAP monitoring. The CNAP waveform was classified into four types: triphasic, biphasic, positive, and flat. At the completion of the tumor resection, the triphasic waveform was observed in 11 patients and the biphasic waveform was observed in 11 patients. Hearing function was preserved in all of them, although it was preserved in only two patients with other CNAP waveform types. The prognostic value of CNAP is significantly higher than that of ABR. We found that although CNAP with a microdissector does not provide real-time monitoring, with the classification of waveforms it can be used as predictable tool for postoperative hearing more accurately than ABR.

KEYWORDS

cochlear nerve action potential - microdissector - auditory brainstem response - vestibular schwannoma

REFERENCES

• 1 Tucker A, Slattery III W H, Solcyk L, Brackmann D E. Intraoperative auditory assessments as predictors of hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma surgery.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2001;  12(9) 471-477
• 2 Abramson M, Stein B M, Pedley T A, Emerson R G, Wazen J J. Intraoperative BAER monitoring and hearing preservation in the treatment of acoustic neuromas.  Laryngoscope. 1985;  95(11) 1318-1322
• 3 Danner C, Mastrodimos B, Cueva R A. A comparison of direct eighth nerve monitoring and auditory brainstem response in hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma.  Otol Neurotol. 2004;  25(5) 826-832
• 4 Schmerber S, Lavieille J P, Dumas G, Herve T. Intraoperative auditory monitoring in vestibular schwannoma surgery: new trends.  Acta Otolaryngol. 2004;  124(1) 53-61
• 5 Jackson L E, Roberson Jr J B. Acoustic neuroma surgery: use of cochlear nerve action potential monitoring for hearing preservation.  Am J Otol. 2000;  21(2) 249-259
• 6 Nedzelski J M, Chiong C M, Cashman M Z, Stanton S G, Rowed D W. Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery: value of monitoring cochlear nerve action potentials.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;  111(6) 703-709
• 7 Rowed D W, Nedzelski J M, Cashman M Z, Stanton S, Harrison R V. Cochlear nerve monitoring during cerebellopontine angle operations.  Can J Neurol Sci. 1988;  15(1) 68-72
• 8 Linden R D, Tator C H, Benedict C, Charles D, Mraz V, Bell I. Electrophysiological monitoring during acoustic neuroma and other posterior fossa surgery.  Can J Neurol Sci. 1988;  15(1) 73-81
• 9 Zappia J J, Wiet R J, O'Connor C A, Martone L. Intraoperative auditory monitoring in acoustic neuroma surgery.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 l;  115(1) 98-106
• 10 Samii M, Matthies C. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): surgical management and results with an emphasis on complications and how to avoid them.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  40(1) 11-21
• 11 Samii M, Matthies C. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the facial nerve–preservation and restitution of function.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  40(4) 684-694
• 12 Samii M, Gerganov V, Samii A. Improved preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma surgery via the retrosigmoid approach in a series of 200 patients.  J Neurosurg. 2006;  105(4) 527-535
• 13 Møller A R, Jannetta P J. Compound action potentials recorded intracranially from the auditory nerve in man.  Exp Neurol. 1981;  74(3) 862-874
• 14 Roberson Jr J B, Jackson L E, McAuley J R. Acoustic neuroma surgery: absent auditory brainstem response does not contraindicate attempted hearing preservation.  Laryngoscope. 1999;  109(6) 904-910
• 15 Hoehmann D. Pre- and postoperative hearing thresholds and brainstem responses in patients with acoustic neuroma: follow-up study using the middle fossa approach.  Am J Otol. 1991;  12(3) 172-178
• 16 Colletti V, Fiorino F G, Mocella S, Policante Z. ECochG, CNAP and ABR monitoring during vestibular schwannoma surgery.  Audiology. 1998;  37(1) 27-37
• 17 Sekiya T, Iwabuchi T, Kamata S, Ishida T. Deterioration of auditory evoked potentials during cerebellopontine angle manipulations. An interpretation based on an experimental model in dogs.  J Neurosurg. 1985;  63(4) 598-607
• 18 Rosenberg S I, Martin W H, Pratt H, Schwegler J W, Silverstein H. Bipolar cochlear nerve recording technique: a preliminary report.  Am J Otol. 1993;  14(4) 362-368
• 19 Tani T, Ushida T, Yamamoto H, Okuhara Y. Waveform changes due to conduction block and their underlying mechanism in spinal somatosensory evoked potential: a computer simulation. Technical note.  J Neurosurg. 1997;  86(2) 303-310
• 20 Colletti V, Fiorino F G. Advances in monitoring of seventh and eighth cranial nerve function during posterior fossa surgery.  Am J Otol. 1998;  19(4) 503-512
• 21 Colletti V, Bricolo A, Fiorino F G, Bruni L. Changes in directly recorded cochlear nerve compound action potentials during acoustic tumor surgery.  Skull Base Surg. 1994;  4(1) 1-9