Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2009; 26(2): 106-114
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1222453
© Thieme Medical Publishers

A Review of Evolving Dialysis Catheter Technologies

Martha-Grace Knuttinen1 , Sonia Bobra1 , Julian Hardman1 , Ron C. Gaba1 , James T. Bui1 , Charles A. Owens1
  • 1Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, Illinios
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 June 2009 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Dialysis catheters continue to play a vital role in the delivery of hemodialysis to patients for both temporary vascular access, serving as a bridge to permanent access, and for long-term access for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). During the past decade, there has been an emergence of technological advancements in the design of dialysis catheters in an attempt to reduce catheter malfunction, decrease infection rates, and improve their long-term efficiency. New improvements in catheter design are aimed at translating into improved catheter performance. This review article summarizes some of the novel catheter designs developed within the last decade.

KEYWORDS

Dialysis - end-stage renal disease - catheters - tunneled catheters

REFERENCES

  • 1 Anonymous . III. NKF-K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access: update 2000.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;  37(1, Suppl 1) S137-S181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Tokars J I, Frank M, Alter M J, Arduino M J. National surveillance of dialysis-associated diseases in the United States, 2000.  Semin Dial. 2002;  15(3) 162-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 U.S. Renal Data System .USRDS 2008 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD; National Institute of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Willms L, Vercaigne L M. Does warfarin safely prevent clotting of hemodialysis catheters? A review of efficacy and safety.  Semin Dial. 2008;  21(1) 71-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Watnick S, Stooksbury M, Winter R, Riscoe M, Cohen D M. White thrombus formation in blood tubing lines in a chronic hemodialysis unit.  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;  3(2) 382-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lénárd L, Szabados S, Imre J et al.. [Vena cava superior syndrome: surgical treatment of the thrombosis of the superior vena cava after implantation of a hemodialysis catheter—a case report and review of the literature].  Orv Hetil. 2008;  149(1) 29-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Solomon D D, Arnold W L, Martin N D, Lentz D J. An in vivo method for the evaluation of catheter thrombogenicity.  J Biomed Mater Res. 1987;  21(1) 43-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sherertz R J, Carruth W A, Marosok R D, Espeland M A, Johnson R A, Solomon D D. Contribution of vascular catheter material to the pathogenesis of infection: the enhanced risk of silicone in vivo.  J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;  29(5) 635-645
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Tal M G, Ni N. Selecting optimal hemodialysis catheters: material, design, advanced features, and preferences.  Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;  11(3) 186-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Atherikul K, Schwab S J, Conlon P J. Adequacy of haemodialysis with cuffed central-vein catheters.  Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;  13(3) 745-749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mickley V. Central venous catheters: many questions, few answers.  Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;  17(8) 1368-1373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hoen B, Paul-Dauphin A, Hestin D, Kessler M. EPIBACDIAL: a multicenter prospective study of risk factors for bacteremia in chronic hemodialysis patients.  J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;  9(5) 869-876
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nielsen J, Ladefoged S D, Kolmos H J. Dialysis catheter-related septicaemia—focus on Staphylococcus aureus septicaemia .  Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;  13(11) 2847-2852
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Marr K A, Sexton D J, Conlon P J, Corey G R, Schwab S J, Kirkland K B. Catheter-related bacteremia and outcome of attempted catheter salvage in patients undergoing hemodialysis.  Ann Intern Med. 1997;  127(4) 275-280
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Dhingra R K, Young E W, Hulbert-Shearon T E, Leavey S F, Port F K. Type of vascular access and mortality in U.S. hemodialysis patients.  Kidney Int. 2001;  60(4) 1443-1451
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hung K Y, Tsai T J, Yen C J, Yen T S. Infection associated with double lumen catheterization for temporary haemodialysis: experience of 168 cases.  Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995;  10(2) 247-251
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 McCarthy M C, Shives J K, Robison R J, Broadie T A. Prospective evaluation of single and triple lumen catheters in total parenteral nutrition.  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;  11 259-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Maki D G, Stolz S M, Wheeler S, Mermel L A. Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter. A randomized, controlled trial.  Ann Intern Med. 1997;  127(4) 257-266
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Greenfeld J I, Sampath L, Popilskis S J, Brunnert S R, Stylianos S, Modak S. Decreased bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters implanted in swine.  Crit Care Med. 1995;  23(5) 894-900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Schwab S J, Beathard G. The hemodialysis catheter conundrum: hate living with them, but can't live without them.  Kidney Int. 1999;  56(1) 1-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Fan P Y. Acute vascular access: new advances.  Adv Ren Replace Ther. 1994;  1(2) 90-98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Schwab S J, Buller G L, McCann R L, Bollinger R R, Stickel D L. Prospective evaluation of a Dacron cuffed hemodialysis catheter for prolonged use.  Am J Kidney Dis. 1988;  11(2) 166-169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Twardowski Z. High dose intradialytic urokinase to restore patency of permanent central vein hemodialysis catheters.  Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;  31(5) 841-847
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Dryden M S, Samson A, Ludlam H A, Wing A J, Phillips I. Infective complications associated with the use of the Quinton ‘Permcath’ for long-term central vascular access in haemodialysis.  J Hosp Infect. 1991;  19(4) 257-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Maki D G, Cobb L, Garman J K, Shapiro J M, Ringer M, Helgerson R B. An attachable silver-impregnated cuff for prevention of infection with central venous catheters: a prospective randomized multicenter trial.  Am J Med. 1988;  85(3) 307-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Flowers III R H, Schwenzer K J, Kopel R F, Fisch M J, Tucker S I, Farr B M. Efficacy of an attachable subcutaneous cuff for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infection. A randomized, controlled trial.  JAMA. 1989;  261(6) 878-883
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Trerotola S O, Johnson M S, Shah H et al.. Tunneled hemodialysis catheters: use of a silver-coated catheter for prevention of infection—a randomized study.  Radiology. 1998;  207(2) 491-496
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bambauer R, Mestres P, Schiel R, Schneidewind-Muller J M, Bambauer S, Sioshansi P. Large bore catheters with surface treatments versus untreated catheters for blood access.  J Vasc Access. 2001;  2(3) 97-105
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lau C E. Transparent and gauze dressings and their effect on infection rates of central venous catheters: a review of past and current literature.  J Intraven Nurs. 1996;  19(5) 240-245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 James M T, Conley J, Tonelli M, Manns B J, MacRae J, Hemmelgarn B R. Alberta Kidney Disease Network . Meta-analysis: antibiotics for prophylaxis against hemodialysis catheter-related infections.  Ann Intern Med. 2008;  148(8) 596-605
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (DOQI) .Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access. 
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Yahav D, Rozen-Zvi B, Gafter-Gvili A, Leibovici L, Gafter U, Paul M. Antimicrobial lock solutions for the prevention of infections associated with intravascular catheters in patients undergoing hemodialysis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.  Clin Infect Dis. 2008;  47(1) 83-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Silva J, Teixeira e Costa, Baptista A, Ramos A, Ponce P. Catheter-related bactermia in hemodialysis: which preventive measures to take?.  Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;  110(4) c251-c257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Onder A M, Chandar J, Simon N et al.. Treatment of catheter-related bacteremia with tissue plasminogen activator antibiotic locks.  Pediatr Nephrol. 2008;  23(3) 457-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Falagas M E, Fragoulis K, Bliziotis I A, Chatzinikolaou I. Rifampicin-impregnated central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.  J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;  59(3) 359-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Halton K, Graves N. Economic evaluation and catheter-related bloodstream infections.  Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;  13(6) 815-823
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lumsden A. A unique combination technology of ePTFE and proprietary end-point covalent bonding of heparin for lower extremity revascularization: the GORE PROPATEN vascular graft.  Vasc Dis Manag. 2007;  4(Suppl. B) 11B-14B
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Jain G, Allon M, Maya I. Retrospective comparison of heparin-coated and non-coated tunneled dialysis catheters.  ASN. 2008;  , Renal week abstract presentation
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Trerotola S O, Shah H, Johnson M et al.. Randomized comparison of high-flow versus conventional hemodialysis catheters.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;  10(8) 1032-1038
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Warren S E, O'Connor D T, Steinberg S M. Recirculation: a uremic syndrome complicating the use of prosthetic arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis.  J Dial. 1978;  2(3) 251-259
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Senécal L, Saint-Sauveur E, Leblanc M. Blood flow and recirculation rates in tunneled hemodialysis catheters.  ASAIO J. 2004;  50(1) 94-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 O'Dwyer H, Fotheringham T, O'Kelly P et al.. A prospective comparison of two types of tunneled hemodialysis catheters: the Ash Split versus the PermCath.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;  28(1) 23-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Van Ha T, Santeler S, Lorenz J et al.. Comparison between the split-tip catheter and non split-tip catheter for hemodialysis.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;  18(suppl 1) S45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Tal M G, Peixoto A J, Crowley S T, Denbow N, Eliseo D, Pollak J. Comparison of side hole versus non side hole high flow hemodialysis catheters.  Hemodial Int. 2006;  10(1) 63-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Fuchs S, Pollak A, Gilon D. Central venous catheter mechanical irritation of the right atrial free Wall:A cause for thrombus formation.  Cardiology. 1999;  91(3) 169-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Ross J. Optimizing catheter tip positioning.  Endovasc Today. 2003;  2 32-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Davanzo W J. Efficacy and safety of a retrograde tunneled hemodialysis catheter: 6-month clinical experience with the Cannon Catheter chronic hemodialysis catheter.  J Vasc Access. 2005;  6(1) 38-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Tal M G. Comparison of recirculation percentage of the palindrome catheter and standard hemodialysis catheters in a swine model.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;  16(9) 1237-1240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Spector M, Mojibian H, Eliseo D et al.. Clinical outcome of the Tal Palindrome chronic hemodialysis catheter: single institution experience.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;  19(10) 1434-1438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Tokars J I, Finelli L, Alter M J, Arduino M J. National surveillance of dialysis-associated diseases in the United States, 2001.  Semin Dial. 2004;  17(4) 310-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Allon M. Dialysis catheter-related bacteremia: treatment and prophylaxis.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;  44(5) 779-791
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Martha-Grace KnuttinenM.D. Ph.D. 

Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Illinois Medical Center

1740 West Taylor Street, Suite 2483, Chicago, IL 60612-7233

Email: mgk600@hotmail.com