Abstract
Objective: Work-up of thyroid nodules remains challenging. Recent technologies enable determination of tissue elasticity and perfusion using ultrasound devices. The aim of the present study was to evaluate real-time elastography (RTE) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Sonovue (CEUS) for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
Materials and Methods: Inclusion criteria were: nodules ≥1 cm, non-functioning or hypo-functioning on radionuclide scanning, and cytological/histological assessment. All patients received conventional ultrasound, RTE and CEUS. RTE was classified as: Elasticity-Score (ES)1=soft, ES2=predominantly soft, ES3=predominantly hard, ES4=hard nodule. CEUS-video clips were digitally recorded and analyzed using time-intensity-curves within selected regions-of-interest.
Results: Fifty-three nodules in 50 patients were available for analysis. Forty-six nodules were benign on cytology/histology, 6 nodules were papillary carcinoma and one nodule was a follicular carcinoma. Nodule margin irregularity was the ultrasound pattern most predictive of malignancy with sensitivity 57% (95% confidence interval: 18–90%) and specificity 85% (71–94% p<0.05). When using ES3&4 for the diagnosis of malignant nodules sensitivity and specificity were 86% (42–99.7%) and 87% (75–95%), respectively (p=0.0003). The only malignant nodule missed with RTE was a follicular carcinoma. Sensitivity for the diagnosis of papillary carcinoma therefore was 100%. No specific CEUS pattern could be identified to differentiate between benign and malignant nodules.
Conclusions: RTE seems to be a useful tool in the work-up of thyroid nodules to exclude papillary thyroid cancer. However, follicular carcinoma remains a challenging problem. CEUS did not improve the characterization of thyroid nodules in this preliminary study.
Key words
sonography - thyroid cancer - radionuclide scanning - CEUS - dignity
References
1
Guidelines of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology for the Examination of Fine-Needle Aspiration Specimens from Thyroid Nodules .
The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Task Force on Standards of Practice.
Mod Pathol.
1996;
9
710-715
2
Argalia G, De Bernardis S, Mariani D. et al .
Ultrasonographic contrast agent: evaluation of time-intensity curves in the characterisation of solitary thyroid nodules.
Radiol Med.
2002;
103
407-413
3
Asteria C, Giovanardi A, Pizzocaro A. et al .
US-elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
Thyroid.
2008;
18
523-531
4
Bartolotta TV, Midiri M, Galia M. et al .
Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of solitary thyroid nodules with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: initial results.
Eur Radiol.
2006;
16
2234-2241
5
Berker D, Aydin Y, Ustun I. et al .
The value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in subcentimeter thyroid nodules.
Thyroid.
2008;
18
603-608
6
Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR. et al .
Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer.
Thyroid.
2006;
16
109-142
7 Dietlein M, Dressler J, Grünwald F. et al. .Leitlinie zur Schilddrüsendiagnostik. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nuklearmedizin e.V.; 2003
8
Dighe M, Bae U, Richardson ML. et al .
Differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules with US elastography using carotid artery pulsation.
Radiology.
2008;
248
662-669
9
Frey H.
Realtime-elastography.
A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity. Radiologe.
2003;
43
850-855
10
Gharib H, Goellner JR, Johnson DA.
Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid. A 12-year experience with 11 000 biopsies.
Clin Lab Med.
1993;
13
699-709
11
Gritzmann N, Koischwitz D, Rettenbacher T.
Sonography of the thyroid and parathyroid glands.
Radiol Clin North Am.
2000;
38
1131-1145
, xii
12
Hegedus L.
Clinical practice The thyroid nodule.
N Engl J Med.
2004;
351
1764-1771
13
Hegedus L, Bonnema SJ, Bennedbaek FN.
Management of simple nodular goiter: Current status and future perspectives.
Endocr Rev.
2003;
24
102-132
14
Iannuccilli JD, Cronan JJ, Monchik JM.
Risk for malignancy of thyroid nodules as assessed by sonographic criteria: The need for biopsy.
J Ultrasound Med.
2004;
23
1455-1464
15
Ivanac G, Brkljacic B, Ivanac K. et al .
Vascularisation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: CD US evaluation.
Ultraschall Med.
2007;
28
502-506
16
Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R. et al .
Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US Elastography.
Radiology.
2005;
237
202-211
17
Meller J, Becker W.
The continuing importance of thyroid scintigraphy in the era of high-resolution ultrasound.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.
2002;
29
((Suppl 2))
S425-S438
18
Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H. et al .
Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues.
Ultrason Imag.
1991;
13
111-114
19
Pacini F, Schlumberger M, Dralle H. et al .
European consensus for the management of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma of the follicular epithelium.
Eur J Endocrinol.
2006;
154
787-803
20
Rago T, Santini F, Scutari M. et al .
Elastography: new developments in ultrasound for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2007;
92
2917-2922
21
Ramsden JD.
Angiogenesis in the thyroid gland.
J Endocrinol.
2000;
166
475-480
22
Reiners C, Wegscheider K, Schicha H. et al .
Prevalence of thyroid disorders in the working population of Germany: ultrasonography screening in 96 278 unselected employees.
Thyroid.
2004;
14
926-932
23
Rubaltelli L, Corradin S, Dorigo A. et al .
Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules at elastosonography.
Ultraschall Med.
2008;
1
1-2
24
Spiezia S, Farina R, Cerbone G. et al .
Analysis of color Doppler signal intensity variation after levovist injection: a new approach to the diagnosis of thyroid nodules.
J Ultrasound Med.
2001;
20
223-231
25
Strobel D, Seitz K, Blank W. et al .
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions – diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice (DEGUM multicenter trial).
Ultraschall in der Medizin.
2008;
5
499-505
Correspondence
Priv.- Doz. Dr. med. J. Bojunga
Medizinische Klinik 1
Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang
Goethe Universität
Theodor-Stern-Kai 7
60590 Frankfurt am Main
Phone: +49(0)69-6301-5297
Email: Joerg.Bojunga@kgu.de