Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1237725
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Influence of Blood Pressure Variability on short-term Outcome in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Publication History
Publication Date:
14 April 2010 (online)
Abstract
Objective: Several recent investigations have demonstrated a significant influence of blood pressure variation during the immediate period after stroke. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of blood pressure, intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure variation on short-term outcome in patients after severe subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
Material and Methods: 105 patients suffering from severe SAH were included in the study. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) grading were used to describe the patients on admission, and the short-term outcome was assessed using the GCS and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) Score. In all patients, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were continuously recorded. For each recorded parameter (SBP, DBP, MAP, ICP and CPP) the first recorded value was defined as the baseline value (bas). The minimum (min), maximum (max) and average (mean) value was identified from all recorded values for each parameter and the range between minimum and maximum value was calculated (range). Based on the individual parameter range (absolute values) the variability of successive values was determined as the successive variation (sv). Finally, the values obtained were correlated to clinical outcome and analyzed statistically.
Results: In 105 patients the database offered an average of 330.4 single readings (median 318). SBPmax, and SBPrange were significantly lower in the group with an improving short-term GCS than in the group with constant or deteriorating GCS (p=0.0079 and p=0.0006, respectively). SBPmin was significantly higher in the improved GCS group (p=0.0235). With regard to successive variation (SBPsv) we could not demonstrate a significant difference between both groups (mean SBPsv 15.7 vs. 14.7; p=0.1223), and no correlation with either GCS at discharge (p=0.91) or GOS at discharge (p=0.841) was detectable. There was no statistically significant difference in CPP and ICP between both outcome groups.
Conclusion: Systolic blood pressure levels and range appear to be of importance for the management of patients suffering from SAH and may influence patient outcome.
Key words
subarachnoid hemorrhage - successive variation - outcome - blood pressure
References
- 1 Rosengart AJ, Schultheiss KE, Tolentino J. et al . Prognostic factors for outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2007; 38 2315-2321
- 2 Gotoh O, Tamura A, Yasui N. et al . Glasgow Coma Scale in the prediction of outcome after early aneurysm surgery. Neurosurgery. 1996; 39 19-24 discussion 24–15
- 3 Heuer GG, Smith MJ, Elliott JP. et al . Relationship between intracranial pressure and other clinical variables in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2004; 101 408-416
- 4 Chiang VL, Claus EB, Awad IA. Toward more rational prediction of outcome in patients with high-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2000; 46 28-35 discussion 35–26
- 5 Deruty R, Pelissou-Guyotat I, Mottolese C. et al . Level of consciousness and age as prognostic factors in aneurysmal SAH. Acta Neurochir. 1995; 132 1-8
- 6 Lanzino G, Kassell NF, Germanson TP. et al . Age and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: why do older patients fare worse?. J Neurosurg. 1996; 85 410-418
- 7 Soehle M, Chatfield DA, Czosnyka M. et al . Predictive value of initial clinical status, intracranial pressure and transcranial Doppler pulsatility after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir. 2007; 149 575-583
- 8 Koivisto T, Vanninen R, Hurskainen H. et al . Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. A prospective randomized study. Stroke. 2000; 31 2369-2377
- 9 Hutter BO, Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Gilsbach JM. Health-related quality of life after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: impacts of bleeding severity, computerized tomography findings, surgery, vasospasm, and neurological grade. J Neurosurg. 2001; 94 241-251
- 10 Berry E, Jones RA, West CG. et al . Outcome of subarachnoid haemorrhage. An analysis of surgical variables, cognitive and emotional sequelae related to SPECT scanning. Brit J Neurosurg. 1997; 11 378-387
- 11 Muench E, Horn P, Bauhuf C. et al . Effects of hypervolemia and hypertension on regional cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, and brain tissue oxygenation after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35 1844-1851 quiz 1852
- 12 Rabinstein AA, Pichelmann MA, Friedman JA. et al . Symptomatic vasospasm and outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A comparison between surgical repair and endovascular coil occlusion. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98 319-325
- 13 Butzkueven H, Evans AH, Pitman A. et al . Onset seizures independently predict poor outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 2000; 55 1315-1320
- 14 Wartenberg KE, Schmidt JM, Claassen J. et al . Impact of medical complications on outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34 617-623
- 15 Raabe A, Beck J, Keller M. et al . Relative importance of hypertension compared with hypervolemia for increasing cerebral oxygenation in patients with cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2005; 103 974-981
- 16 Solenski NJ, Haley Jr EC, Kassell NF. et al . Medical complications of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A report of the Multicenter, Cooperative Aneurysm Study. Participants of the Multicenter Cooperative Aneurysm Study. Crit Care Med. 1995; 23 1007-1017
- 17 Yong M, Diener HC, Kaste M. et al . Characteristics of blood pressure profiles as predictors of long-term outcome after acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2005; 36 2619-2625
- 18 Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974; 2 81-84
- 19 Drake C. Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a universal subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale. J Neurosurg. 1988; 68 985-986
- 20 Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery. 1980; 6 1-9
- 21 Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975; 1 480-484
- 22 Le Roux PD, Elliott JP, Newell DW. et al . Predicting outcome in poor-grade patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: A retrospective review of 159 aggressively managed cases. J Neurosurg. 1996; 85 39-49
- 23 Yarlagadda S, Rajendran P, Miss JC. et al . Cardiovascular predictors of in-patient mortality after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit care. 2006; 5 102-107
- 24 Niesen WD, Rosenkranz M, Schummer W. et al . Cerebral venous flow velocity predicts poor outcome in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2004; 35 1873-1878
- 25 Eide PK, Sorteberg W. Intracranial pressure levels and single wave amplitudes, Glasgow Coma Score and Glasgow Outcome Score after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir. 2006; 148 1267-1275 discussion 1275–1266
Correspondence
Dr. K. Beseoglu
Heinrich-Heine-Universität,
Neurochirurgische Klinik
Moorenstraße 5
40225 Düsseldorf
Germany
Phone: 0211-8116268
Fax: 0211-8116501
Email: Beseoglu@med.uni-duesseldorf.de