Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1240972
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Open Window Thoracostomy: Modern Update of an Ancient Operation
Publication History
received July 10, 2009
Publication Date:
31 May 2010 (online)
Abstract
Introduction: In modern day thoracic surgical practice, better understanding of the pathophysiology of intrathoracic infections, improved antibiotic therapy and advancements in thoracic surgical techniques have decreased the use of procedures such as open window thoracostomy (OWT). Despite this, there are occasions where OWT cannot be avoided, and it is of interest where its current utility lies. To determine the current efficacy of OWT, we reviewed our recent experience with a focus on the indications, timing of surgery, effectiveness in clearing infection, patient survival, and timing of closure. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, charts of 78 patients were reviewed. Dates reviewed were from 1/1/1998 to 1/1/2008. Patients were predominantly male (66 %) with a median age 58 years. Median time from initial diagnosis to OWT was 70 days (range 1 to 720 days). Results: Primary indication for surgery was empyema in 75 (96 %), and most patients had previous thoracic surgery. The most frequent causes of empyema were post-pneumonectomy (n = 25), post-pneumonic (n = 14), and post-lobectomy (n = 9). Bronchopleural fistulae were present in 29 (37 %) cases. Lung cancer was diagnosed in 34 (45 %) patients, and 24 underwent perioperative radiation therapy. Patient survival at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 5 years was 94 %, 82 %, 74 % and 60 %, respectively, with an in-hospital mortality of 6.4 %. Infection was controlled in nearly all patients (n = 72). Fifteen (19 %) patients underwent surgical closure for OWT; in 2 (2.6 %), OWT closed spontaneously. Conclusions: Currently, open window thoracostomy is used to treat complex empyema incurred from pulmonary resection, cancer and/or infection in patients that cannot be managed by more conservative strategies. Overall mortality and morbidity rates are acceptable in this debilitated patient group.
Key words
thoracic surgery - lung transplantation - infection - pneumonectomy - pneumonia - empyema
References
- 1 Adams F. The Genuine works of Hippocrates. New York; W. Wood and Company 1886: 248-249
- 2 Hurt R. The history of cardiothoracic surgery from early times, Vol. xviii. New York; Parthenon 1996: 514
- 3 Fleming A. On the antibacterial action of cultures of a penicillium, with special reference to their use in the isolation of B. influenzae. Br J Exp Pathol. 1929; 10 (31) 226-236
- 4 Mandal A K, Thadepalli H, Chettipally U. Outcome of primary empyema thoracis: therapeutic and microbiologic aspects. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 66 1782-1786
- 5 Boffa D J, Mason D P, Su J W et al. Decortication after lung transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 85 1039-1043
- 6 Eloesser L. Of an operation for tuberculous empyema. Ann Thorac Surg. 1969; 8 355-357
- 7 Thourani V H, Lancaster R T, Mansour K A, Miller Jr J I. Twenty-six years of experience with the modified Eloesser flap. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 76 401-406
- 8 Clagett O T, Geraci J E. A procedure for the management of postpneumonectomy empyema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1963; 45 141-145
- 9 Duan M, Chen G, Wang T et al. One-stage pedicled omentum majus transplantation into thoracic cavity for treatment of chronic persistent empyema with or without bronchopleural fistula. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999; 16 636-638
- 10 Garcia-Yuste M, Ramos G, Duque J L et al. Open-window thoracostomy and thoracomyoplasty to manage chronic pleural empyema. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 65 818-822
- 11 Massera F, Robustellini M, Pona C D et al. Predictors of successful closure of open window thoracostomy for postpneumonectomy empyema. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 82 288-292
- 12 Okumura Y, Takeda S, Asada H et al. Surgical results for chronic empyema using omental pedicled flap: long-term follow-up study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 79 1857-1861
- 13 Regnard J F, Alifano M, Puyo P et al. Open window thoracostomy followed by intrathoracic flap transposition in the treatment of empyema complicating pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 120 270-275
- 14 Jadczuk E. Posptneumonectomy empyema. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998; 14 123-126
- 15 Zaheer S, Allen M S, Cassivi S D et al. Postpneumonectomy empyema: results after the Clagett procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 82 279-286 discussion 286-287
- 16 Molnar T F. Current surgical treatment of thoracic empyema in adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007; 32 422-430
- 17 Hunt I, Barber B, Southon R, Treasure T. Is talc pleurodesis safe for young patients following primary spontaneous pneumothorax?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007; 6 117-120
- 18 Shamji F M, Ginsberg R J, Cooper J D et al. Open window thoracostomy in the management of postpneumonectomy empyema with or without bronchopleural fistula. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983; 86 818-822
- 19 Bayes A J, Wilson J A, Chiu R C et al. Clagett open-window thoracostomy in patients with empyema who had and had not undergone pneumonectomy. Can J Surg. 1987; 30 329-331
- 20 Schneiter D, Cassina P, Korom S et al. Accelerated treatment for early and late postpneumonectomy empyema. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 72 1668-1672
- 21 Ditterich D, Rexer M, Rupprecht H. [Vacuum assisted closure in the treatment of pleural empyema – first experiences with intra-thoracal application]. Zentralbl Chir. 2006; 131 (Suppl. 1) S133-S138
David P. Mason, M. D.
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Cleveland Clinic
9500 Euclid Ave./J-100
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
United States
Phone: +1 21 64 44 40 53
Fax: +1 21 66 36 12 67
Email: masond2@ccf.org