Download PDF
neuroreha 2009; 1(1): 10-18
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1242443
Schwerpunkt Repetition

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Hintergrund: Rehabilitation und Plastizität

Christoph Globas, Joachim Cerny, Andreas R. Luft
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 November 2009 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Das menschliche Gehirn ist in erstaunlichem Maße in der Lage, sich weiterzuentwickeln und äußeren Einflüssen anzupassen. Diese Fähigkeit der Umgestaltung von Nervenzellverbünden bezeichnet man als neuronale Plastizität. Diese Prozesse sind für die Rehabilitation nach Hirnschädigung sehr bedeutend, z. B. im Rahmen eines Schlaganfalls. Ziel ist es, über das Verständnis der neuronalen Plastizität und deren zugrunde liegenden molekularen und elektrophysiologischen Mechanismen durch Entwicklung darauf basierender Trainingsprogramme und supportiver Maßnahmen den Rehabilitationserfolg entscheidend zu verbessern. Dieser Artikel gibt einen kurzen Überblick über Mechanismen neuronaler Plastizität. Auf diesen Erkenntnissen basiert deren Nachweis am lebenden Menschen und die Entwicklung moderner rehabilitativer Verfahren. Christoph Globas

Literatur

  • 01 Adkins D L, Boychuk J, Remple M S. et al. . Motor training induces experience-specific patterns of plasticity across motor cortex and spinal cord.  J Appl Physiol . 2006;  101(6) 1776-1782
    Google Scholar
  • 02 Baron J C, Cohen L G, Cramer S C. et al. . Neuroimaging in stroke recovery: a position paper from the First International Workshop on Neuroimaging and Stroke .  Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;  18(3) 260-267
    Google Scholar
  • 03 Butefisch C M, Netz J, Wessling M. et al. . Remote changes in cortical excitability after stroke.  Brain. 2003;  126 470-481
    Google Scholar
  • 04 Carel C, Loubinoux I, Boulanouar K. et al. . Neural substrate for the effects of passive training on sensorimotor cortical representation: a study with functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy subjects.  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;  20(3 478-484
    Google Scholar
  • 05 Carmichael S T. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: making waves.  Ann Neurol . 2006;  59(5) 735-742
    Google Scholar
  • 06 Carroll T J, Herbert R D, Munn J. Contralateral effects of unilateral strength training: evidence and possible mechanisms.  J Appl Physiol. 2006;  101(5) 1514-1522
    Google Scholar
  • 07 Cramer S C, Nelles G, Benson R R. et al. . A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke.  Stroke. 1997;  28(12) 2518-2527
    Google Scholar
  • 08 de Kroon J R, Ijzerman M J, Chae J. et al. . Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke.  J Rehabil Med. 2005;  37(2) 65-74
    Google Scholar
  • 09 Draganski B, Gaser C, Busch V. et al. . Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training.  Nature. 2004;  427(6972) 311-312
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Elbert T, Rockstroh B. Reorganization of human cerebral cortex: the range of changes following use and injury.  Neuroscientist. 2004;  10(2 129-141
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Enzinger C, Johansen-Berg H, Dawes H. et al. . Functional MRI correlates of lower limb function in stroke victims with gait impairment.  Stroke. 2008;  39(5) 1507-1513
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gauthier L V, Taub E, Perkins C. et al. . Remodeling the brain: plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke.  Stroke. 2008;  39(5) 1520-1525
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hamzei F, Liepert J, Dettmers C. et al. . Two different reorganization patterns after rehabilitative therapy: an exploratory study with fMRI and TMS.  Neuroimage. 31(2) 710-720
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Hebb D O. Organization of behavior. New York, John Wiley 1949
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Johansen-Berg H, Dawes H, Guy C. et al. . Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy.  Brain. 2002;  125 2731-2742
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Johansen-Berg H, Rushworth M F, Bogdanovic M F. et al. . The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;  99(22) 14518-14523
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kaelin-Lang A, Luft A R, Sawaki L. et al. . Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input.  J Physiol. 2002;  540 623-633
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kolb B, V I Q. Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg, Berlin, Oxford, Spektrum 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Kollen B J, Lennon S, Lyons B. et al. . The Effectiveness of the Bobath Concept in Stroke Rehabilitation. What is the Evidence?.  Stroke. 2009;  40 89-97 (EPub)
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar R C. et al. . Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis.  Stroke. 2004;  35(11) 2529-2539
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lacourse M G, Turner J A, Randolph-Orr E. et al. . Cerebral and cerebellar sensorimotor plasticity following motor imagery-based mental practice of a sequential movement. .  J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;  41(4) 505-524
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang H R. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans.  Stroke. 2000;  31(6) 1210-1216
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Luft A R, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J. et al. . Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA. 2004;  292(15) 1853-1861
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Luft A R, Macko R F, Forrester L W. et al. . Treadmill exercise activates subcortical neural networks and improves walking after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.  Stroke. 2008;  39(12) 3341-3350
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Macko R F, Ivey F M, Forrester L W. et al. . Treadmill exercise rehabilitation improves ambulatory function and cardiovascular fitness in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled trial.  Stroke. 2005;  36(10) 2206-2211
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mehrholz J, Werner C, Kugler J. et al. . Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 4 Art.No. CD006185
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Merzenich M M, Nelson R J, Stryker M P. et al. . Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys.  J Comp Neurol. 1984;  224(4) 591-605
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mudie M H, Matyas T A. Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke?.  Disabil Rehabil. 2000;  22 23-37
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R. et al. . Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke.  Ann Neurol. 2004;  55(3) 400-409
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Page S J, Levine P, Leonard A. Mental practice in chronic stroke: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.  Stroke. 2007;  38(4) 1293-1297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Rossini P M, Rossi S. Clinical applications of motor evoked potentials.  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;  106(3) 180-194
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Rossini P M, Calautti C, Pauri F. et al. . Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain.  Lancet Neurol. 2003;  2(8) 493-502
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Rossini P M, Rossi S. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: diagnostic, therapeutic, and research potential.  Neurology. 2007;  68(7) 484-488
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Muller F, Koenig E. Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study.  Lancet. 2001;  358 787-790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Shaw. et al. . Neurodevelopmental Trajectories of the Human Cerebral Cortex.  Neurosci. 2008;  28(14) 3586-3594
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Stewart K C, Cauraugh J H, Summers J J. Bilateral movement training and stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  J Neurol Sci . 2006;  244 89-95
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Takahashi C D, Der-Yeghiaian L , Le V. et al. . Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke.  Brain. 2008;  131(Pt 2) 425-437
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Taub E, Miller N E, Novack T A. et al. . Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;  74(4) 347-354
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Wolf S L, Winstein C J, Miller J P. et al. . Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.  JAMA. 2006;  296(17) 2095-2104
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Wolf S L, Winstein C J, Miller J P. et al. . Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial.  Lancet Neurol . 2008;  7(1) 33-40
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Dr. med. Christoph  Globas
Joachim Cerny
Prof. Dr. med. Andreas R Luft

Neurologische Klinik und Hertie-Institut für Klinische Hirnforschung des Universitätsklinikums Tübingen

Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen

Phone: Tel.: 07071/2980414

Email: cglobas@me.com