White's Classification of Diabetes in Pregnancy in the 21st Century: Is It Still Valid?

ABSTRACT

White's classification system (WCS) was created 60 years ago to identify diabetic (DM) pregnancies at increased risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality. Our objective was to assess the association between WCS and adverse pregnancy outcome (APO) in contemporary DM pregnancies. We studied diabetic women with singleton pregnancies who delivered at >20 weeks at a single institution over a 1-year period (2007 to 2008). Perinatal outcomes were compared between WCS groups. APO was defined as any of the following: preterm birth <34 weeks, severe preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, and neonatal respiratory disease. Presence of vascular disease was defined as presence of chronic hypertension, chronic renal insufficiency, retinopathy, coronary artery disease, or prior cerebrovascular event. One hundred ninety-six DM pregnancies met the criteria. No significant differences in APO existed between White's class groups among women with pregestational DM (32.7% class B versus 26.9% class C versus 57.1% class D to F; p = 0.46). Logistic regression revealed that vascular disease was associated with APO (odds ratio = 2.7, 95% confidence interval = 1.2 to 6.2). In our population, presence of vascular disease, rather than WCS, was a better predictor of APO in DM women.

KEYWORDS

Diabetes mellitus - White's classification - adverse pregnancy outcome - vascular disease

REFERENCES

• 1 White P. Pregnancy complicating diabetes.  Am J Med. 1949;  7 609-616
• 2 White P. Classification of obstetric diabetes.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;  130 228-230
• 3 Omori Y. Classification of diabetic pregnancy. In: Hod M, Jovanovic L, DiRenzo G, DeLeiva A, Langer O Textbook of Diabetes and Pregnancy. 1st ed. New York; Informa Healthcare 2003
• 4 Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030.  Diabetes Care. 2004;  27 1047-1053
• 5 Lapolla A, Dalfrà M G, Lencioni C, Di Cianni G. Epidemiology of diabetes in pregnancy: a review of Italian data.  Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2004;  17 358-367
• 6 ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins . ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 60, March 2005. Pregestational diabetes mellitus.  Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  105 675-685
• 7 Gabbe S G, Graves C R. Management of diabetes mellitus complicating pregnancy.  Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  102 857-868
• 8 Metzger D F, Phelps R L, Dooley S L. The mother in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. In: Porte D, Sherwin RS, Baron A Ellenberg and Rifkin's Diabetes Mellitus. 6th ed. New York; McGraw-Hill 2002: 625-626
• 9 Metzger B E, Phelps R L. Diabetes during pregnancy.  Curr Ther Endocrinol Metab. 1997;  6 318-324
• 10 Diamond M P, Salyer S L, Vaughn W K, Cotton R, Boehm F H. Reassessment of White's classification and Pedersen's prognostically bad signs of diabetic pregnancies in insulin-dependent diabetic pregnancies.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;  156 599-604
• 11 National Diabetes Data Group . Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance.  Diabetes. 1979;  28 1039-1057