Endoscopy 2010; 42(3): 208-212
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1243843
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Constipation is not associated with an increased rate of findings on colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy consortium

M.  Gupta1 , J.  Holub2 , K.  Knigge2 , G.  Eisen2
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 2 March 2009

accepted after revision 26 November 2009

Publikationsdatum:
25. Januar 2010 (online)

Background and study aims: There are no definite guidelines regarding colonoscopic evaluation for the indication of constipation, a common gastrointestinal complaint. The aim of our study was to determine the risk of finding significant lesions in patients undergoing colonoscopy for the indication of constipation alone compared with constipation with another indication or average-risk screening.

Patients and methods: A retrospective review of the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative database was carried out for colonoscopies undertaken between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2003. A total of 41 775 index colonoscopies performed for the indications of average-risk screening, constipation only or constipation with another indication were identified. Logistic regression analyses were performed for constipation alone versus constipation with another indication, and for constipation alone versus average-risk screening.

Results: Constipation alone did not show any increased risk of significant findings on colonoscopy. Constipation and the presence of another indication, however, had a statistically significant increased risk of a significant finding on colonoscopy. The indication of constipation alone had a lower risk of significant findings on colonoscopy compared with average-risk screening. Variations in the definition of constipation used was a limitation of the study.

Conclusions: Colonoscopy for constipation alone has a lower yield for significant findings compared with average-risk screening and constipation with another indication; hence, colonoscopy should not be done for constipation alone.

References

  • 1 Sonnenberg A, Koch T R. Epidemiology of constipation in the United States.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;  32 1-8
  • 2 American College of Gastroenterology Chronic Constipation Task Force . An evidence-based approach to the management of chronic constipation in North America.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 Suppl 1 S1-4
  • 3 Stewart W F, Liberman J N, Sandler R S. et al . Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 3530-3540
  • 4 Pare P, Ferrazzi S, Thompson W G. et al . An epidemiological survey of constipation in canada: definitions, rates, demographics, and predictors of health care seeking.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 3130-3137
  • 5 Locke 3rd  G R, Pemberton J H, Phillips S F. American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement: guidelines on constipation.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  119 1761-1766
  • 6 Qureshi W, Adler D G, Davila R E. et al . ASGE guideline: guideline on the use of endoscopy in the management of constipation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 199-201
  • 7 Sonnenberg A, Muller A D. Constipation and cathartics as risk factors of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.  Pharmacology. 1993;  47 Suppl 1 224-233
  • 8 Dukas L, Willett W C, Colditz G A. et al . Prospective study of bowel movement, laxative use, and risk of colorectal cancer among women.  Am J Epidemiol. 2000;  151 958-964
  • 9 Pepin C, Ladabaum U. The yield of lower endoscopy in patients with constipation: survey of a university hospital, a public county hospital, and a Veterans Administration medical center.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 325-332
  • 10 Roberts M C, Millikan R C, Galanko J A. et al . Constipation, laxative use, and colon cancer in a North Carolina population.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 857-864
  • 11 Watanabe T, Nakaya N, Kurashima K. et al . Constipation, laxative use and risk of colorectal cancer: The Miyagi Cohort Study.  Eur J Cancer. 2004;  40 2109-2115
  • 12 Lieberman D A, Weiss D G, Bond J H. et al . Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.  New Engl J Med. 2000;  343 162-168
  • 13 Kune G A, Kune S, Field B, Watson L F. The role of chronic constipation, diarrhea, and laxative use in the etiology of large-bowel cancer. Data from the Melbourne Colorectal Cancer Study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;  31 507-512
  • 14 Jacobs E J, White E. Constipation, laxative use, and colon cancer among middle-aged adults.  Epidemiology. 1998;  9 385-391
  • 15 Harewood G C, Lieberman D A. Prevalence of advanced neoplasia at screening colonoscopy in men in private practice versus academic and Veterans Affairs medical centers.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 2312-2316

G. EisenMD, MPH 

Digestive Health Center
Center for Health and Healing
6th floor

3303 SW Bond Ave.
Portland
OR 97239
USA

Fax: +1-503-869-8725

eMail: eiseng@ohsu.edu