Complications of single-balloon enteroscopy: a prospective evaluation of 166 procedures

Background and study aim: Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) has proven to be a relatively safe method for small-bowel evaluation, with a complication rate of 1 %. The main concern after diagnostic DBE is acute pancreatitis. Single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) has emerged as a viable alternative to DBE. Until now, no incidence of pancreatitis has been reported for SBE. The aims were to evaluate complication rate and occurrence of hyperamylasemia and to identify the risk factors for hyperamylasemia after SBE.

Patients and methods: Prospectively, consecutive patients undergoing peroral (“proximal”) or combined approach SBE were included. Complications were assessed at 1 and 30 days afterwards. Serum amylase and C-reactive protein (CRP) were assessed immediately before and 2 – 3 hours after SBE.

Results: 166 SBE procedures were performed in 105 patients (53-male; mean age 51 years, range 9 – 87). The indications for SBE were: anemia (n = 55), Crohn’s disease (n = 31) and abdominal complaints suspicious for inflammatory bowel disease (n = 5), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (n = 1) and other (n = 13). Therapeutic interventions were performed during 21 procedures (13 %). One perforation (1 / 21 therapeutic interventions, 4.8 %) occurred after dilation of a benign stricture. While 13 patients (16 %) had post-SBE hyperamylasemia, none had complaints suggesting acute pancreatitis. Factors such as sex, indication, procedure duration, number of passes, route of SBE, findings, and/or treatment showed no significant correlation with presence of hyperamylasemia.

Conclusions: SBE appears to be a safe diagnostic endoscopic procedure. The incidence of hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis after peroral SBE seems comparable to that after DBE.

References

• 1 Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y. et al . Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 216-220
• 2 Tsujikawa T, Saitoh Y, Andoh A. et al . Novel single-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of the small intestine: preliminary experiences.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 11-15
• 3 Kawamura T, Yasuda K, Tanaka K. et al . Clinical evaluation of a newly developed single-balloon enteroscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  68 1112-1116
• 4 Ramchandani M, Reddy D N, Gupta R. et al . Diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact of single-balloon enteroscopy: series of 106 cases.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  24 631-1638 [Epub 2009 Aug 3]
• 5 Tominaga K, Iida T, Nakamura Y. et al . Small-intestinal perforation of endoscopically unrecognized lesions during peroral single-balloon enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 Suppl 2 E213-E214
• 6 May A, Nachbar L, Ell C. Double-balloon enteroscopy (push-and-pull enteroscopy) of the small bowel: feasibility and diagnostic and therapeutic yield in patients with suspected small bowel disease.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 62-70
• 7 Mensink P B, Haringsma J, Kucharzik T. et al . Complications of double balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter survey.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 613-615
• 8 Möschler O, May A D, Müller M K. et al . DBE-Studiengruppe Deutschland: Complications in double-balloon-enteroscopy: results of the German DBE register [in German].  Z Gastroenterol. 2008;  46 266-270
• 9 Groenen M J, Moreels T G, Orlent H. et al . Acute pancreatitis after double-balloon enteroscopy: an old pathogenetic theory revisited as a result of using a new endoscopic tool.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 82-85
• 10 Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 383-393
• 11 May A, Nachbar L, Schneider M. et al . Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique: method of assessing depth of insertion and training of the enteroscopy technique using the Erlangen Endo Trainer.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 66-70
• 12 Bordas J M, Llach J, Mata A. Utility of single- and double-balloon enteroscopy [in Spanish].  Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  32 424-430 [Epub 2009 Jun 5]
• 13 Heine G D, Hadithi M, Groenen M J. et al . Double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, diagnostic yield, and complications in a series of 275 patients with suspected small-bowel disease.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 42-48
• 14 Honda K, Mizutani T, Nakamura K. et al . Acute pancreatitis associated with peroral double-balloon enteroscopy: a case report.  World J Gastroenterol. 2006;  12 1802-1804
• 15 Lo S K. Technical matters in double balloon enteroscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 15-18
• 16 Honda K, Itaba S, Mizutani T. et al . An increase in the serum amylase level in patients after peroral double-balloon enteroscopy: an association with the development of pancreatitis.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1040-1043
• 17 Kopacova M, Rejchrt S, Tacheci L. et al . Hyperamylasemia of uncertain significance associated with oral double-balloon enteroscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 1133-1138
• 18 Aktas H, Mensink P B, Haringsma J. et al . Low incidence of hyperamylasemia after proximal double-balloon enteroscopy: has the insertion technique improved?.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 670-673
• 19 Barkin J S, Lewis B S, Reiner D K. et al . Diagnostic and therapeutic jejunoscopy with a new, longer enteroscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 55-58
• 20 Taylor A C, Buttigieg R J, McDonald I G. et al . Prospective assessment of the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of small-bowel push enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 951-956