Prevalence of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia: An Italian multicenter observational study

Background and study aim: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of nonpolypoid lesions (NPLs) in Italy and their risk of containing neoplasia or advanced histology.

Patients and methods: This was a multicenter cross-sectional observational study on consecutive patients undergoing total colonoscopy over a 3-month period in 80 Italian centers.

Results: In all, 27 400 total colonoscopies were analyzed. Cancer was diagnosed in 801 patients (2.9 %). A total of 6553 precancerous lesions were detected in 5609 patients. Of these, 4154 patients (74.1 %) had polypoid lesions and 1455 patients (25.9 %) had NPLs. Therefore, the prevalence of NPLs was 5.3 % (95 %CI 5.0 – 5.6). NPLs larger than 10 mm were detected in 254 patients (17.5 %). NPLs were more predominant in the proximal colon (OR 2.92, 95 %CI 2.56 – 3.43; P < 0.0001 vs. polypoid lesions). Neoplastic tissue was diagnosed in 79.0 % and advanced histology (high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or more) in 20.9 % of resected lesions. The risk of advanced histology was similar for polypoid and nonpolypoid lesions when adjusted for size. Depressed lesions had the highest risk of advanced histology (OR 10.56, 95 %CI 6.02 – 18.55; P < 0.0000 vs. flat-elevated). Age was an independent predictor of both neoplasia and advanced histology (P = 0.0001).

Conclusions: NPLs are relatively common in the Italian population, with a prevalence similar to that in other Western series. NPLs are not more aggressive than polypoid lesions, except for those with depressed morphology.

References

• 1 Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E. et al . Cancer statistics, 2008.  CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;  58 71-96
• 2 Levin B, Lieberman D A, McFarland B. et al . Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 1570-1595
• 3 Singh H, Turner D, Xue L. et al . Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies.  JAMA. 2006;  295 2366-2373
• 4 Muto T, Kamiya J, Sawada T. et al . Small “flat adenoma” of the large bowel with special reference to its clinicopathologic features.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;  28 847-851
• 5 Ross A S, Waxman I. Flat and depressed neoplasms of the colon in Western populations.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 172-180
• 6 Soetikno R, Friedland S, Kaltenbach T. et al . Nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms.  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 566-576
• 7 Kudo S, Lambert R, Allen J I. et al . Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  68(4 Suppl) S3-S47
• 8 Soetikno R M, Kaltenbach T, Rouse R V. et al . Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults.  JAMA. 2008;  299 1027-1035
• 9 Jaramillo E, Watanabe M, Slezak P. et al . Flat neoplastic lesions of the colon and rectum detected by high-resolution video endoscopy and chromoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 114-122
• 10 Rembacken B, Fujii T, Cairns A. et al . Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK.  Lancet. 2000;  355 1211-1214
• 11 Saitoh Y, Waxman I, West A B. et al . Prevalence and distinctive biologic features of flat colorectal adenomas in a North American population.  Gastroenterology. 2001;  120 1657-1665
• 12 Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E. et al . Flat and depressed colorectal tumors in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study.  Gut. 2002;  51 550-555
• 13 Fujii T, Rembacken B J, Dixon M F. et al . Flat adenomas in the United Kingdom: are treatable cancers being missed?.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 437-443
• 14 Hurlstone D P, Cross S S, Adam I. et al . A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 2543-2549
• 15 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58(6 Suppl) S3-S43
• 16 Tamura S, Nakajo K, Yokoyama Y. et al . Evaluation of endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading rectal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 306-312
• 17 Uraoka T, Saito Y, Matsuda T. et al . Endoscopic indications for endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading tumours in the colorectum.  Gut. 2006;  55 1592-1597
• 18 Rex D K, Petrini J L, Baron T H. et al . Quality indicators for colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 873-885
• 19 Dixon M F. Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited.  Gut. 2002;  51 130-131
• 20 Kuramoto S, Oohara T. Flat early cancers of the large intestine.  Cancer. 1989;  64 950-955
• 21 Chiu H M, Lin J T, Chen C C. et al . Prevalence and characteristics of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm in an asymptomatic and average-risk Chinese population.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  7 463-470
• 22 Park D H, Kim H S, Kim W H. et al . Clinicopathologic characteristics and malignant potential of colorectal flat neoplasia compared with that of polypoid neoplasia.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;  51 43-49
• 23 Okamoto M, Kawabe T, Yamaji Y. et al . Flat-type early colorectal cancer preferentially develops in right-sided colon in older patients.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 101-107
• 24 Rex D K. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2866-2877
• 25 Sung J J, Lau J Y, Young G P. et al . Asia Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer. Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening.  Gut. 2008;  57 1166-1176
• 26 Lieberman D. A call to action – measuring the quality of colonoscopy.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 2588-2589
• 27 Winawer S J, Zauber A G, Fletcher R H. et al . Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 1872-1885
• 28 Kiesslich R, von Bergh M, Hahn M. et al . Chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine improves the detection of adenomatous and non adenomatous lesions in the colon.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 1001-1006
• 29 Fu K I, Sano Y, Kato S. et al . Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: a prospective study.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 1089-1093
• 30 Bianco M A, Rotondano G, Marmo R. et al . Predictive value of magnification chromoendoscopy for diagnosing invasive neoplasia in nonpolypoid colorectal lesions and stratifying patients for endoscopic resection or surgery.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 470-476
• 31 Chiu H M, Chang C Y, Chen C C. et al . A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.  Gut. 2007;  56 373-379
• 32 Matsuda T, Fujii T, Saito Y. et al . Efficacy of the invasive/non-invasive pattern by magnifying chromoendoscopy to estimate the depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;  103 2700-2706