RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1244853
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Blutzucker-Senkung und kardiovaskulärer Vorteil: Was wissen wir heute?
Glycemic control and cardiovascular benefit: What do we know today?Publikationsverlauf
eingereicht: 22.6.2009
akzeptiert: 1.10.2009
Publikationsdatum:
09. Februar 2010 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Die Frage, ob eine alleinige Blutzuckersenkung die kardiovaskuläre Ereignisrate bei langjährigen Typ 2 Diabetikern beeinflussen kann, wird nach wie vor kontrovers diskutiert. Neue Erkenntnisse liefern die Studien ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT und die UKPDS-Nachbeobachtung. Die drei erstgenannten Untersuchungen machen deutlich, dass mikrovaskulärer und makrovaskulärer Benefit einer strengen BZ-Kontrolle getrennt beurteilt werden müssen: Während der günstige Einfluss auf mikrovaskuläre Komplikationen wie die diabetische Nephropathie unstrittig ist, bleibt der generelle makrovaskuläre Nutzen in diesen Megastudien weiterhin fraglich und muss im Zusammenhang mit dem individuellen globalen Risiko betrachtet werden. Demgegenüber konnten die Langzeitergebnisse der Diabetesinterventionsstudie DIS und die UKPDS-Nachbeobachtung zeigen, dass eine frühzeitige intensivierte BZ-Einstellung das kardiovaskuläre Outcome durchaus nachhaltig positiv verändert – der Einfluss kommt aber erst nach einem relativ langen Zeitraum von ein bis zwei Jahrzehnten zum Tragen. Erstmalig wurde in der PROactive-Studie der kardiovaskuläre Nutzen einer antidiabetischen Einzelsubstanz (Pioglitazon) beim fortgeschrittenen Diabetes mit multiplen Manifestationen einer Makroangiopathie nachgewiesen. Hier zeigte sich bereits nach knapp 3 Jahren ein makrovaskulärer Benefit. Allerdings stellte sich dieser nicht primär als Resultat der Blutzuckersenkung dar, sondern als therapeutischer Nutzeffekt der komplexen Wirkungen des PPARγ-Agonisten Pioglitazon auf Insulinresistenz, Lipoproteinspektrum, Blutdruck, Endothelfunktion und auf Biomarker der subklinischen Entzündung. Dies macht deutlich, dass wir pleiotrope Effekte antidiabetischer Substanzen auf das metabolische Syndrom und die Auswirkungen auf kardiovaskuläre Endpunkte stärker in Therapieentscheidungen einbeziehen sollten. Für diese komplexen Fragestellungen wird eine breite wissenschaftliche Evidenz in Form von Endpunktstudien angestrebt, die für die allermeisten Antidiabetika bisher jedoch nicht verfügbar ist.
Abstract
It is still a much debated question whether antidiabetic therapy to target normal glycated hemoglobin levels would reduce cardiovascular events in patients with advanced type 2 diabetes. New findings result from ACCORD, ADVANCE and VADT. These trials reveal that microvascular and macrovascular effects of intensive glucose lowering have to be considered separately: Glycemic control convincingly demonstrated to have a protective impact on microvascular complications, especially nephropathy. However, macrovascular benefits remain doubtful in these megatrials and have to be considered in connection with the individual global risk. On the other hand, the Diabetes Intervention Study (DIS) and UKPDS 10-year follow-up results yielded better cardiovascular outcomes for those patients who received intensive glucose-lowering therapy very early after diabetes diagnosis, but the favourable influences did not manifest until a time period of 1 – 2 decades. For the first time, the cardiovascular benefit of an antidiabetic substance (pioglitazone) could be verified in the large-scale outcome-trial PROactive for patients with advanced diabetes and multiple manifestations of macroangiopathy. The results provide strong support for a beneficial influence on macrovascular complications just under 3 years of treatment. Nevertheless, the positive findings did not result from better glycemic control, but from the complexity of effects of PPARγ agonist pioglitazone on insulin resistance, lipoprotein spectrum, blood pressure, endothelial function and biomarkers of subclinical inflammation. It is obvious that we need to integrate such pleiotropic effects on metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease to improve the quality of drug-therapy decisions. This, in turn, requires a growing body of evidence from large, long-term outcome trials – but appropriate data are still unavailable for the vast majority of antidiabetic drugs.
Schlüsselwörter
ACCORD - ADVANCE - VADT - UKPDS - DIS - DCCT - PROactive - RECORD - Blutzuckerkontrolle
Keywords
ACCORD - ADVANCE - VADT - UKPDS - DIS - DCCT - PROactive - RECORD - blood glucose control
Literatur
- 1
Gerstein H C, Miller M E, Byington R P et al Action to Control
Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group.
Effects
of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes.
N Engl
J Med.
2008;
358
2545-2459
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J et al ADVANCE Collaborative Group.
Intensive
blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type
2 diabetes.
N Engl J Med.
2008;
358
2560-2572
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Al Majali K, Cooper M B, Staels B, Luc G, Taskinen M R, Betteridge D J.
The effect
of sensitisation to insulin with pioglitazone on fasting and postprandial
lipid metabolism, lipoprotein modification by lipases, and lipid
transfer activities in type 2 diabetic patients.
Diabetologia.
2006;
49
527-537
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Aronoff S, Rosenblatt S, Braithwaite S, Egan J W, Mathisen A L, Schneider R L.
Pioglitazone
hydrochloride monotherapy improves glycemic control in the treatment
of patients with type 2 diabetes: a 6-month randomized placebo-controlled
dose-response study. The Pioglitazone 001 Study Group.
Diabetes
Care.
2000;
23
1605-1611
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Berhanu P, Kipnes M S, Khan M A. et al .
Effects of pioglitazone
on lipid and lipoprotein profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes
and dyslipidaemia after treatment conversion from rosiglitazone
while continuing stable statin therapy.
Diab Vasc Dis
Res.
2006;
3
39-44
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Campia U, Matuskey L A, Panza J A.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma
activation with pioglitazone improves endothelium-dependent dilation
in nondiabetic patients with major cardiovascular risk factors.
Circulation.
2006;
113
867-875
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Ceriello A, Johns D, Widel M, Eckland D J, Gilmore K J, Tan M H.
Comparison
of effect of pioglitazone with metformin or sulfonylurea (monotherapy
and combination therapy) on postload glycemia and composite insulin
sensitivity index during an oral glucose tolerance test in patients
with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
2005;
28
266-272
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Charbonnel B, Schernthaner G, Brunetti P. et al .
Long-term efficacy and tolerability of
add-on pioglitazone therapy to failing monotherapy compared with
addition of gliclazide or metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetologia.
2005;
48
1093-1104
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Daikeler R, Erdmann E, Forst T. et al .
Wissenschaftlich Evidenz in der ärztlichen
Praxis: 10 Thesen zur Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit einer
Therapie mit Glitazonen.
Diabetes, Stoffwechsel und Herz.
2006;
6
94-99
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Deeg M A, Buse J B, Goldberg R B. et al .
Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have
different effects on serum lipoprotein particle concentrations and
sizes in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia.
Diabetes Care.
2007;
30
2458-2464
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Derosa G, Cicero A F, Dangelo A. et al .
Thiazolidinedione effects on blood pressure
in diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome treated with glimepiride.
Hypertens Res.
2005;
28
917-924
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Derosa G, Cicero A F, Gaddi A, Ragonesi P D, Piccinni M N, Fogari E, Salvadeo S, Ciccarelli L, Fogari R.
A comparison of the effects of pioglitazone
and rosiglitazone combined with glimepiride on prothrombotic state
in type 2 diabetic patients with the metabolic syndrome.
Diabetes
Res Clin Pract.
2005;
69
5-13
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Dormandy J A, Charbonnel B, Eckland D J. et al .
Secondary prevention of macrovascular
events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective
pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised
controlled trial.
Lancet.
2005;
366
1279-1289
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T. et al .
Glucose control and vascular complications
in veterans with type 2 diabetes.
N Engl J Med.
2009;
360
129-139
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Erdmann E, Dormandy J A, Charbonnel B, Massi-Benedetti M, Moules I K, Skene A M.
The effect of pioglitazone on recurrent myocardial infarction
in 2,445 patients with type 2 diabetes and previous myocardial infarction:
results from the PROactive (PROactive 05) Study.
J Am
Coll Cardiol.
2007;
49
1772-1780
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Fernandez M, Triplitt C, Wajcberg E. et al .
Addition of pioglitazone and ramipril to
intensive insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients improves vascular
dysfunction by different mechanisms.
Diabetes Care.
2008;
31
121-127
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Füllert S, Schneider F, Haak E. et al .
Effects of pioglitazone in nondiabetic
patients with arterial hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled
study.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2002;
87
5503-5506
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Goldberg R B, Kendall D M, Deeg M A at al.
A comparison of lipid and glycemic
effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type
2 diabetes and dyslipidemia.
Diabetes Care.
2005;
28
1547-1554
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Hanefeld M, Brunetti P, Schernthaner G H, Matthews D R, Charbonnel B H. Study Group .
QUARTET
One-year glycemic control with a sulfonylurea plus pioglitazone
versus a sulfonylurea plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
2004;
27
141-147
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Hanefeld M, Fischer S, Julius U, Schulze J, Schwanebeck U, Schmechel H, Ziegelasch H J, Lindner J.
Risk
factors for myocardial infarction and death in newly detected NIDDM:
the Diabetes Intervention Study, 11-year follow-up.
Diabetologia.
1996;
39
1577-1583
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Hanefeld M, Schmechel H, Schwanebeck U, Lindner J.
Predictors of coronary
heart disease and death in NIDDM: the Diabetes Intervention Study
experience.
Diabetologia.
1997;
40
(Suppl 2)
S123-124
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Hanefeld M, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T.
The postprandial
state and the risk of atherosclerosis.
Diabet Med.
1997;
14
(Suppl 3)
S6-11
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Holman R R, Paul S K, Bethel M A, Matthews D R, Neil H A.
10-year follow-up of intensive
glucose control in type 2 diabetes.
N Engl J Med.
2008;
359
1577-1589
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Home P D, Pocock S J, Beck-Nielsen H. et al .
Rosiglitazone evaluated
for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for
type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label
trial.
Lancet.
2009;
373
2125-2135
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Juurlink D N, Gomes T, Lipscombe L L, Austin P C, Hux J E, Mamdani M M.
Adverse
cardiovascular events during treatment with pioglitazone and rosiglitazone:
population based cohort study.
BMJ.
2009;
339
b2942
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Lawrence J M, Reid J, Taylor G J, Stirling C, Reckless J P.
Favorable effects of pioglitazone and metformin compared with
gliclazide on lipoprotein subfractions in overweight patients with
early type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
2004;
27
41-46
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Miyazaki Y, Mahankali A, Matsuda M, Mahankali S, Hardies J, Cusi K, Mandarino L J, DeFronzo R A.
Effect of
pioglitazone on abdominal fat distribution and insulin sensitivity
in type 2 diabetic patients.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2002;
87
2784-2791
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Nathan D M, Cleary P A, Backlund J Y. et al .
Intensive Diabetes Treatment
and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.
N Engl
J Med.
2005;
353
2643-2653
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Nissen S E, Wolski K.
Effect of rosiglitazone
on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular
causes.
N Engl J Med.
2007;
356
2457-2471
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Pavo I, Jermendy G, Varkonyi T T. et al .
Effect of pioglitazone compared with metformin
on glycemic control and indicators of insulin sensitivity in recently
diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes.
J Clin Endocrinol
Metab.
2003;
88
1637-1645
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Pfützner A, Marx N, Lübben G. et al .
Improvement of cardiovascular risk markers
by pioglitazone is independent from glycemic control: results from
the pioneer study.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2005;
45
1925-1931
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Pop-Busui R, Lombardero M, Lavis V. et al .
Relation of severe coronary artery narrowing
to insulin or thiazolidinedione use in patients with type 2 diabetes
mellitus (from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation
2 Diabetes Study).
Am J Cardiol.
2009;
104
52-58
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Ray K K, Seshasai S R, Wijesuriya S. et al .
Effect of intensive control
of glucose on cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with
diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Lancet.
2009;
373
1765-1772
MissingFormLabel
- 34
Roden M, Laakso M, Johns D. et al .
Long-term effects of pioglitazone and metformin
on insulin sensitivity in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Diabet Med.
2005;
22
1101-1106
MissingFormLabel
- 35
Satoh N, Ogawa Y, Usui T. et
al .
Antiatherogenic effect of pioglitazone in type
2 diabetic patients irrespective of the responsiveness to its antidiabetic
effect.
Diabetes Care.
2003;
26
2493-2499
MissingFormLabel
- 36
Schernthaner G, Matthews D R, Charbonnel B, Hanefeld M, Brunetti P. Quartet Study Group .
Efficacy and
safety of pioglitazone versus metformin in patients with type 2
diabetes mellitus: a double-blind, randomized trial.
J
Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2004;
89
6068-6076
MissingFormLabel
- 37
Schneider C A, Ferrannini E, Defronzo R, Schernthaner G, Yates J, Erdmann E.
Effect of pioglitazone
on cardiovascular outcome in diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
J Am Soc Nephrol.
2008;
19
182-187
MissingFormLabel
- 38
Szapary P O, Bloedon L T, Samaha F F. et al .
Effects of pioglitazone
on lipoproteins, inflammatory markers, and adipokines in nondiabetic patients
with metabolic syndrome.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.
2006;
26
182-188
MissingFormLabel
- 39
Tan M H, Glazer N B, Johns D, Widel M, Gilmore K J.
Pioglitazone as monotherapy or in combination with sulfonylurea
or metformin enhances insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S or QUICKI) in
patients with type 2 diabetes.
Curr Med Res Opin.
2004;
20
723-728
MissingFormLabel
- 40
Tan M H, Johns D, Strand J. et al .
Sustained effects of pioglitazone vs. glibenclamide
on insulin sensitivity, glycaemic control, and lipid profiles in
patients with Type 2 diabetes.
Diabet Med.
2004;
21
859-866
MissingFormLabel
- 41
Wilcox R, Bousser M G, Betteridge D J, Schernthaner G, Pirags V, Kupfer S, Dormandy J.
Effects of pioglitazone
in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without previous stroke:
results from PROactive (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial
In macroVascular Events 04).
Stroke.
2007;
38
865-873
MissingFormLabel
- 42
Winkler K, Konrad T, Füllert S. et al .
Pioglitazone reduces atherogenic dense
LDL particles in nondiabetic patients with arterial hypertension:
a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Diabetes Care.
2003;
26
2588-2594
MissingFormLabel
- 43 Zietemann V, Storz P, Freytag A, Hagenmeyer E G, Gothe H. HTA Bericht zur Effektivität, zur Anwendungssicherheit
und zur gesundheitsökonomischen Bewertung von Pioglitazon
und Rosiglitazon bei der Behandlung des Typ 2 Diabetes mellitus. IGES Institut GmbH 2008 Berichts-Nr:
HTAi006; http://gripsdb.dimdi.de/de/hta/hta_berichte/hta231_bericht_de.pdf
MissingFormLabel
Prof. Dr. med. Markolf Hanefeld
Zentrum für Klinische Studien GWT-TUD
GmbH
Fiedlerstraße 34
01307 Dresden
Telefon: 0351 44 00 580
Fax: 0351
44 00 581
eMail: hanefeld@gwtonline-zks.de