PDF herunterladen
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2010; 227(6): 478-482
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245447
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Komplikationen nach posteriorer lamellärer Keratoplastik (DSAEK): Vermeiden, Erkennen und Behandeln

Complications after Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DSAEK): Prevention, Detection and TreatmentL. M. Heindl1 , F. E. Kruse1 , C. Cursiefen1
  • 1Augenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Eingegangen: 19.1.2010

Angenommen: 26.4.2010

Publikationsdatum:
17. Juni 2010 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Posteriore lamelläre Keratoplastiktechniken, wie die Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK), nehmen zunehmend Einzug in die klinische Routine. Ziel der Arbeit ist es, typische Komplikationen nach DSAEK, deren Management sowie Strategien zur Vermeidung darzustellen. Methoden: Literaturübersicht aus PUBMED und eigene klinische Ergebnisse. Ergebnisse: Die postoperative Flapdislokation, die mit erneuter Luftfüllung der Vorderkammer behandelt werden kann, ist die häufigste und typischste Komplikation nach DSAEK (10 – 30 % der Patienten). Schlussfolgerung: Eine sorgfältige Indikationsstellung, Operationstechnik und Nachsorge können die DSAEK zu einem relativ sicheren und effektiven Therapieverfahren bei endothelialen Hornhauterkrankungen machen.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to outline typical complications after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and to discuss their prevention and management. Methods: Our own clinical results and PUBMED literature search were evaluated. Results: Postoperative flap dislocation, which can be effectively treated by re-bubbling the graft, is the most common and typical complication after DSAEK. Conclusions: Careful preoperative indication, surgery and postoperative care make DSAEK a safe and effective new therapeutic option for patients with endothelial corneal disease.

Schlüsselwörter

Kornea - Katarakt - Bindehaut - posteriore lamelläre Keratoplastik - DSAEK - DMEK

Key words

cornea - conjunctiva - cataract - posterior lamellar keratoplasty - DSAEK - DMEK

Literatur

  • 1 Cursiefen C, Küchle M, Naumann G OH. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty: histopathology of 1250 corneal buttons.  Cornea. 1998;  17 468-470
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Price F W, Price M O. Does endothelial cell survival differ between DSEK and standard PK?.  Ophthalmology. 2009;  116 367-368
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Das Jr S, Langenbucher A, Jacobi C et al. Long-term refractive and visual outcome after penetrating keratoplasty only versus the triple procedure in Fuchs’ dystrophy.  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;  244 1089-1095
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Bachmann B O, Pogorelov P, Kruse F E et al. Patientenzufriedenheit nach posteriorer lamellärer Keratoplastik (DSAEK).  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2008;  225 577-581
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Levinger E et al. Retrospective contralateral study comparing descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty.  Cornea. 2009;  28 485-488
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Gorovoy M S. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.  Cornea. 2006;  25 886-889
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Heindl L M, Hofmann-Rummelt C, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U et al. Histologic analysis of descemet stripping in posterior lamellar keratoplasty.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;  126 461-464
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Melles G R, Eggink F A, Lander F et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty.  Cornea. 1998;  17 618-626
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Busin M, Arffa R C, Sebastiani A. Endokeratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty for the surgical treatment of diseased endothelium: initial results.  Ophthalmology. 2000;  107 2077-2082
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Cursiefen C, Kruse F E. Posteriore lamelläre Keratoplastik (DSAEK).  Ophthalmologe. 2009;  106 939-952
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Terry M A, Shamie N, Chen E S et al. Endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs’ dystrophy with cataract: complications and clinical results with the new triple procedure.  Ophthalmology. 2009;  116 631-639
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Ousley P J, Terry M A. Stability of vision, topography, and endothelial cell density from 1 year to 2 years after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty surgery.  Ophthalmology. 2005;  112 50-57
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Pogorelov P, Cursiefen C, Bachmann B O et al. Changes in donor corneal lenticule thickness after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with organ-cultured corneas.  Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;  93 825-829
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Price M O, Price F W. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue.  Ophthalmology. 2006;  113 1936-1942
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Price M O, Jordan C S, Moore Jr G et al. Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: part two: the statistical analysis of probability and risk factors.  Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;  93 391-395
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Terry M A. Endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcomes in the two years following deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;  105 530-563
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Terry M A, Ousley P J. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series.  Ophthalmology. 2005;  112 1541-1548
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Cursiefen C, Kruse F E. Posteriore lamelläre Keratoplastik (DSAEK).  Ophthalmologe. 2008;  105 183-190
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Anshu A, Chee S P, Mehta J S et al. Cytomegalovirus endotheliitis in Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty.  Ophthalmology. 2009;  116 624-630
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Jordan C S, Price M O, Trespalacios R et al. Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: part one: clinical signs and symptoms.  Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;  93 387-390
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Nguyen N X, Seitz B, Martus P et al. Long-term topical steroid treatment improves graft survival following normal-risk penetrating keratoplasty.  Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;  144 318-319
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Melles G R, Ong T S, Ververs B et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).  Cornea. 2006;  25 987-990
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Ham L, Balachandran C, Verschoor C A et al. Visual rehabilitation rate after isolated descemet membrane transplantation: descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;  127 252-255
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Bachmann B, Laaser K, Cursiefen C et al. A new method for correct orientation of Descemet membrane during DMEK.  Am J Ophthalmol. (in press)
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Lam V M, Nguyen N X, Martus P et al. Surgery-related factors influencing corneal neovascularization after low-risk keratoplasty.  Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;  141 260-266
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Ide T, Yoo S H, Kymionis G D et al. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK): effect of nontoxic gentian violet marking pen on DSAEK donor tissue viability by using vital dye assay.  Cornea. 2008;  27 562-564
    Google Scholar

PD Dr. Claus Cursiefen

Augenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen

91054 Erlangen

Telefon: ++ 49/91 31/8 53 30 01

Fax: ++ 49/91 31/8 53 64 01

eMail: ccursiefen@yahoo.com