What Is the Optimal Gestational Age for History-Indicated Cerclage Placement?

ABSTRACT

We estimated the optimal gestational age for placement of a history-indicated cerclage in a retrospective cohort study of pregnancies during the period between 1994 to 2007. Pregnancies were divided into two groups: group 1, cerclage <14 weeks (n = 83), and group 2, cerclage ≥14 weeks (n = 59). The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) <35 weeks. Parametric and nonparametric tests were performed where appropriate. One hundred forty-two pregnancies by 130 women were included. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. The median gestational age at cerclage was 12 weeks (group 1) and 15 weeks (group 2). There was no difference in the primary outcome, incidence of SPTB <35 weeks (17% versus 20%; p = 0.59) between groups 1 and 2, respectively. Likewise, the secondary outcomes, mean gestational age at birth (38 versus 37 weeks; p = 0.96), incidence of low birth weight (28% versus 23%; p = 0.50), and the incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes (17% versus 18%; p = 0.89) were similar between groups. No other gestational age cutoff was predictive of SPTB <35 weeks using a receiver operator characteristic curve (13 to 17 weeks; area = 0.52; p = 0.64). Gestational age of history-indicated cerclage placement was not associated with a significant effect on preterm birth in high-risk women. The optimal gestational age for placement of a history-indicated cerclage is probably 12 to 14 weeks, after screening for fetal anomalies and aneuploidy.

KEYWORDS

Cervical cerclage - gestational age - preterm birth

REFERENCES

• 1 Births: Preliminary Data for 2006. National Vital Statistics Reports (by CDC); Volume 56, Number 7. p. 18. (PHS) 2008–1120. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/07newsreleases/teenbirth.htm Retrieved December 7, 2008
• 2 Analysis of March of Dimes Perinatal Data Center using the national inpatient sample (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) .National Center for Health Statistics: final natality data. Available at: http://www.marchofdimes.com/peristats/ Retrieved December 7, 2008
• 3 Shirodkar V N. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortions in the second-trimester of pregnancy.  Antiseptic. 1955;  52 299-300
• 4 Rush R W, Isaacs S, McPherson K, Jones L, Chalmers I, Grant A. A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;  91 724-730
• 5 Althuisius S M, Dekker G A, van Geijn H P, Bekedam D J, Hummel P. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): study design and preliminary results.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  183 823-829
• 6 MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage . Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;  100 516-523
• 7 Lazar P, Gueguen S, Dreyfus J, Renaud R, Pontonnier G, Papiernik E. Multicentred controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at moderate risk of preterm delivery.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;  91 731-735
• 8 Ezechi O C, Kalu B KE, Nwokoro C A. Prophylactic cerclage for the prevention of preterm delivery.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;  85 283-284
• 9 Dor J, Shalev J, Mashiach S, Blankstein J, Serr D M. Elective cervical suture of twin pregnancies diagnosed ultrasonically in the first trimester following induced ovulation.  Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1982;  13 55-60
• 10 Bogota-Angela S P, Bega G. Ultrasound in pregnancy: if, when, what. In: Berghella V Obstetric Evidence Based Guidelines. 1st ed. UK; Informa healthcare 2007: 23-9
• 11 Barford D A, Rosen M G. Cervical incompetence: diagnosis and outcome.  Obstet Gynecol. 1984;  64 159-163
• 12 Angel J L, Pietrantoni M, O'Brien W F, Knuppel R A. Cervical cerclage in early pregnancy.  J Perinatol. 1991;  11 258-261
• 13 Treadwell M C, Bronsteen R A, Bottoms S F. Prognostic factors and complication rates for cervical cerclage: a review of 482 cases.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;  165 555-558
• 14 Charles D, Edwards W R. Infectious complications of cervical cerclage.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;  141 1065-1071
• 15 Harger J H. Comparison of success and morbidity in cervical cerclage procedures.  Obstet Gynecol. 1980;  56 543-548
• 16 Cashner K A, Christopher C R, Dysert G A. Spontaneous fetal loss after demonstration of a live fetus in the first trimester.  Obstet Gynecol. 1987;  70 827-830
• 17 Mackenzie W E, Holmes D S, Newton J R. Spontaneous abortion rate in ultrasonographically viable pregnancies.  Obstet Gynecol. 1988;  71 81-83
• 18 Morrow R J, McNay M B, Whittle M J. Ultrasound detection of neural tube defects in patients with elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein.  Obstet Gynecol. 1991;  78 1055-1057
• 19 Malone F D, Canick J A, Ball R H First- and Second-Trimester Evaluation of Risk (FASTER) Research Consortium et al. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome.  N Engl J Med. 2005;  353 2001-2011
• 20 Breathnach F M, Malone F D, Lambert-Messerlian G First and Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk (FASTER) Research Consortium et al. First- and second-trimester screening: detection of aneuploidies other than Down syndrome.  Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  110 651-657
• 21 Czeizel A E, Pataki T, Rockenbauer M. Reproductive outcome after exposure to surgery under anesthesia during pregnancy.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1998;  261 193-199
• 22 Berghella V, Talucci M, Desai A. Does transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before 14 weeks predict preterm delivery in high-risk pregnancies?.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  21 140-144
• 23 Berghella V, Tolosa J E, Kuhlman K A, Weiner S, Bolognese R J, Wapner R J. Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;  177 723-730
• 24 Guzman E R, Forster J K, Vintzileos A M, Ananth C V, Walters C, Gipson K. Pregnancy outcomes in women treated with elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  12 323-327
• 25 Berghella V, Haas S, Chervoneva I, Hyslop T. Patients with prior second-trimester loss: prophylactic cerclage or serial transvaginal sonograms?.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;  187 747-751