Decompression and Interspinous Dynamic Stabilization Using the Locker for Lumbar Canal Stenosis Associated with Low-Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Abstract

Background: Decompression and spinal fusion have been generally recommended for spinal stenosis associated with low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), although this is still controversial. The purpose of the present study is to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes of interspinous dynamic stabilization using the Locker (WINNOVA co, Seoul, Korea) for lumbar canal stenosis with grade I DS.

Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent single level decompression and the Locker application for lumbar canal stenosis with grade I DS and were followed up for at least 2 years. Excluded were those with DS grade II or higher and DS combined with foraminal disc herniation/stenosis. The mean age of patients at the time of surgery was 62.1 years (range: 45−81 years).

Results: There were no complications in the perioperative period. At a mean follow-up duration of 28.3 months (range: 24−32 months), visual analogue scale scores for back pain, leg pain, and Oswestry disability index had decreased significantly; from 4.6, 7.2, and 38.5% to 2.4, 2.6, and 15.3%, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 87% of the patients. The mean percentage of slippage did not change significantly. The mean sagittal rotation angle significantly decreased from 9.7 to 6.5° (p=0.01). One patient (4.3%) underwent secondary fusion surgery due to persistent pain.

Conclusions: Decompression and interspinous dynamic stabilization using the Locker yielded favorable clinical and radiological outcomes for lumbar canal stenosis with grade I DS and could be an alternative for spinal fusion. However, further long-term follow-up studies are necessary.

Key words

lumbar spine - Locker - spondylolisthesis - posterior dynamic stabilization

References

• 1 Sengupta DK, Herkowitz HN. Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Review of current trends and controversies.  Spine. 2005;  65 571-581
• 2 Hosono N, Namekata M, Makino T. et al . Perioperative complications of primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion for nonisthmic spondylolisthesis: analysis f risk factors.  J Neurosurgery Spine. 2008;  9 403-407
• 3 Kulkarni SS, Lowery GL, Ross RE. et al . Arterial complications following anterior lumbar interbody fusion: report of eight cases.  Eur Spine J. 2003;  12 48-54
• 4 Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T. et al . Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study of complications after facet joint excision and pedicle screw fixation in 148 cases.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;  70 329-334
• 5 Scaduto AA, Gamradt SC, Yu WD. et al . Perioperative complications of threaded cylindrical lumbar interbody fusion devices: anterior versus posterior approach.  J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;  16 502-507
• 6 Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S. et al . Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.  Spine. 2003;  28 1560-1566
• 7 Min JH, Jang JS, Lee SH. Comparison of anterior- and posterior-approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.  J Neurosurgery Spine. 2007;  7 21-26
• 8 Umehara S, Zindrick MR, Patwardhan AG. et al . The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments.  Spine. 2000;  25 1617-1624
• 9 Graf H. Lumbar instability: surgical treatment without fusion.  Rachis. 1992;  412 123-127
• 10 Gardner A, Pande KC. Graf ligamentoplasty: a 7-year follow-up.  Eur Spine J. 2002;  11 157-163
• 11 Grob D, Benini A, Junge A. et al . Clinical experience with the Dynesis semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years.  Spine. 2005;  30 324-331
• 12 Kim KA, McDonald M, Pik JH. et al . Dynamic intraspinous spacer technology for posterior stabilization: case-control study on the safety, sagittal angulation, and pain outcome at 1-year follow-up evaluation.  Neurosurg Focus. 2007;  22 E7
• 13 Kondrashov DG, Hannibal M, Hsu KY. et al . Interspinous process decompression with the X-stop device for lumbar spinal stenosis. A 4-year follow-up study.  J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;  19 323-327
• 14 Kong DS, Kim FS, Eoh W. One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability.  J Korean Med Sci. 2007;  22 330-335
• 15 Senegas J. Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system.  Eur Spine J. 2002;  11 S164-S169
• 16 Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system.  Eur Spine J. 2002;  11 170-178
• 17 Anderson PA, Tribus CB, Kitchel SH. Treatment of neurogenic claudication by interspinous decompression: application of the X STOP device in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;  4 464-471
• 18 Kanayama M, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K. et al . A minimum 10-year follow-up of posterior dynamic stabilization using Graf artificial ligament.  Spine. 2007;  32 1992-1996
• 19 Konno S, Kikuchi S. Prospective study of surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison between decompression alone and decompression with Graf system stabilization.  Spine. 2000;  25 1533-1537
• 20 Schnake KJ, Schaeren S, Jeanneret B. Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.  Spine. 2006;  31 442-449
• 21 Verhoof OJ, Bron JL, Wapstra FH. et al . High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis.  Eur Spine J. 2008;  17 188-192
• 22 Shim CS, Park SW, Lee SH. et al . Biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous stabilizing device, Locker.  Spine. 2008;  22 E820-E827
• 23 Lee SH, Chung ER, Lee DY. Tension band system. In: Kim DH, Cammisa FP, Fessler RG (eds) Dynamic Reconstruction of the Spine. New York: Thieme; 2006. pp 284-291
• 24 Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J. et al . The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.  Physiotherapy. 1980;  66 271-273
• 25 Shim CS, Lee SH, Shin HD. et al . CHARITE versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up.  Spine. 2007;  32 1012-1018
• 26 Jang JS, Lee SH. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;  3 218-223
• 27 Ikuta K, Tono O, Oga M. Clinical outcome of microendoscopic posterior decompression for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis-minimum 2-year outcome of 37 patients.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2008;  51 267-271
• 28 Ikuta K, Tono O, Oga M. Prevalence of clinical features of intraspinal facet cysts after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;  10 617-622
• 29 Lee SH, Enes M, Hoogland T. Soft stabilization with interspinous artificial ligament for mildly unstable lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter comparison.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;  [Epub ahead of print]
• 30 Hashimoto T, Oha F, Shigenobu K. et al . Mid-term clinical results of Graf stabilization for lumbar degenerative pathologies a minimum 2-year follow-up.  Spine J. 2001;  1 283-289
• 31 Konno S, Kikuchi S. Prospective study of surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison between decompression alone and decompression with graf system stabilization.  Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;  25 1533-1537
• 32 Schaeren S, Broger I, Jeanneret B. Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.  Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;  33 E636-E642
• 33 Epstein NE. X-stop: foot drop.  Spine J. 2009;  9 E6-E9
• 34 Lee DY, Jung TG, Lee SH. Single-level instrumented mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;  9 137-144
• 35 Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA. et al . A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results.  Spine. 2005;  30 1351-1358

Correspondence