Skelettale Klasse-II-Anomalie bei Erwachsenen – therapeutische Optionen

Literatur

• 1 Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara Jr. J A et al. Early dentofacial features of class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;  111 502-509
• 2 Grabowski R, Stahl F, Gaebel M et al. Relationship between occlusal findings and orofacial myofunctional status in primary and mixed dentition, Part I: Prevalence of malocclusions.  J Orofac Orthop. 2007;  68 26-37
• 3 Miethke R R, Drescher D (Hrsg.). Kleines Lehrbuch der Angle-Klasse II,1 unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Behandlung.. Berlin: Quintessenz Verlag; 1996
• 4 Lewis A B, Roche A F. Late growth changes in the craniofacial skeleton.  Angle Orthod. 1988;  58 127-135
• 5 Gesch D. A longitudinal study on growth in untreated children with angle class II, division 1 malocclusion.  J Orofac Orthop. 2000;  61 20-33
• 6 Lux C J, Raeth O, Burden D et al. Sagittal and vertical growth of the jaws in class II, division 1 and class II, division 2 malocclusions during prepubertal and pubertal development.  J Orofac Orthop. 2004;  65 290-311
• 7 Angle E H. Classification of malocclusion.  Dent Cosmos. 1899;  248-350
• 8 Fränkel R. Technik und Handhabung der Funktionsregler.. Berlin: VEB Verlag Volk und Gesundheit; 1976
• 9 Sander F G. Indikation für die Anwendung der Vorschubdoppelplatte.  Prakt Kieferorthop. 1988;  2 209-222
• 10 Reichenbach E. Die Extraktionstherapie in historischer Sicht.  Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1967;  28 441-458
• 11 Bishara S E, Ziaja R R, Cummins D M et al. Effects of orthodontic treatment on the growth of individuals with class II division 1 malocclusion.  Angle Orthod. 1994;  64 221-230
• 12 Paquette D E, Beattie J R, Johnston Jr. L E. A Long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in “borderline” class II patients.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;  102 1-14
• 13 Erdinc A E, Nanda R S, Dandajena T C. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;  132 324-331
• 14 Hans M G, Groisser G, Damon C et al. Cephalometric changes in overbite and vertical facial height after removal of 4 first molars or first premolars.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;  130 183-188
• 15 Basciftici F A, Usumez S. Effect of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.  Angle Orthod. 2003;  73 36-42
• 16 Behrents R G. Growth in the aging craniofacial skeleton.. Monograph No. 17. Center for Human Growth and Development. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 1985
• 17 Petrovic A G, Strutzmann J J, Lavergne J. Effects of functional appliances on the mandibular condylar cartilage.. In: Graber T M Physiologic principles of functional appliances.. St. Louis: Mosby; 1985
• 18 Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance: research-based updated clinical possibilities.  World J Orthod. 2000;  1 17-31
• 19 Pancherz H. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1979;  76 423-442
• 20 Bogdan F. The MARA – A non-compliance solution.  Clin Impress. 2006;  15 28-32
• 21 Eckhart J E, White L W. Class II therapy with the Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance.  World J Orthod. 2003;  4 135-144
• 22 Kinzinger G, Diedrich P. Bite jumping with the Functional Mandibular Advancer (FMA).  J Clin Orthod. 2005;  39 696-700
• 23 Kinzinger G, Ostheimer J, Förster F et al. Development of a new fixed functional appliance for treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.  J Orofac Orthop. 2002;  63 384-399
• 24 Kinzinger G, Diedrich P. Skeletal effects in class II treatment with the Functional Mandibular Advancer (FMA)?.  J Orofac Orthop. 2005;  66 469-490
• 25 Covell Jr. D A, Trammell D W, Boero R P et al. Cephalometric study of class II division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance.  Angle Orthod. 1999;  69 311-320
• 26 Ruf S, Pancherz H. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance.  Angle Orthod. 1999;  69 239-246
• 27 Kinzinger G, Frye L, Diedrich P. Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery – a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects.  J Orofac Orthop. 2009;  70 63-91
• 28 Ruf S, Pancherz H. Kiefergelenkswachstumsadaptation bei jungen Erwachsenen während Behandlung mit der Herbst-Apparatur. Eine prospektive magnetresonanztomographische und kephalometrische Studie.  Inf Orthod Kieferorthop. 1998;  30 735-750
• 29 Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodelling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment. A prospective longitudinal MRI and cephalometric roentgenographic investigation.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;  115 607-618
• 30 Kinzinger G S M, Roth A, Gülden N et al. Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed functional orthopaedic appliances on the condyle-fossa relationship in the temporomandibular joint: a magnetic resonance imaging study (Part I).  Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;  35 339-346
• 31 Kinzinger G S M, Roth A, Gülden N et al. Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed functional orthopaedic appliances on the disc-condyle relationship in the temporomandibular joint: a magnetic resonance imaging study (Part II).  Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;  35 347-356
• 32 Kinzinger G S M, Gülden N, Roth A et al. Disc-condyle relationships during treatment for distal bite with the Functional Mandibular Advancer (FMA).  J Orofac Orthop. 2006;  67 356-375
• 33 Kinzinger G, Kober C, Diedrich P. Topography and morphology of the mandibular condyle during fixed functional orthopedic treatment – a magnetic resonance imaging study.  J Orofac Orthop. 2007;  68 124-147
• 34 Frye L, Diedrich P R, Kinzinger G S M. Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery – a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects.  J Orofac Orthop. 2008;  70 63-91