Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Photogrammetric Images in Non-Synostotic Cranial Deformities

Abstract

Objective: Given the increasing incidence of deformational plagiocephaly due to infants’ supine sleeping position to prevent sudden infant death syndrome, reliable anthropometric diagnostics are needed. Besides the traditional method of measuring landmarks with callipers, three-dimensional (3D) photography has great potential. In this investigation the accuracy of 3D photogrammetry is studied.

Methods: The study included 100 randomly chosen children between the ages of 4 and 20 months with a non-synostotic cranial deformity in a retrospective analysis. Measurements of diagonals A and B on the infant's head were obtained once using callipers. 3D photographs of these children were measured 5 times by 5 clinicians separately.

Results: The inter- and intra-rater agreements of the 3D measurements had low variability in the variance component analysis. The standard deviations for reproducibility and repeatability were 0.117–0.283 cm for diagonals A and B. The intra-class correlation coefficients for the inter-rater reliability resulted in excellent agreement (0.97 for plagiocephaly, 0.98 for brachycephaly, 0.96 for combined deformity). The comparison of the 3D photographic and callipers measurements showed that 3D photography resulted in a slight over-estimation.

Conclusion: 3D photogrammetry is potentially a reliable tool for treatment planning and follow-up of abnormal head shapes in infancy.

Key words

photogrammetry - three-dimensional imaging - anthropometry - error - plagiocephaly

References

• 1 Aldridge K, Boyadjiev SA, Capone GT. et al . Precision and error of 3-dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images.  Am J Med Genet A. 2005;  138 247-253
• 2 Ayoub A, Garrahy A, Hood C. et al . Validation of a vision-based, 3-dimensional facial imaging system.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003;  40 523-529
• 3 Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.  Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;  8 135-160
• 4 Butler MG, Hovis CL, Angulo MA. Photoanthropometric study of craniofacial traits in individuals with Prader-Willi syndrome on short-term growth hormone therapy.  Clin Genet. 1998;  53 268-275
• 5 Butler MG, Levine GJ, Le JY. et al . Photoanthropometric study of craniofacial traits of individuals with Prader-Willi syndrome.  Am J Med Genet. 1995;  58 38-45
• 6 Carter MR. Head moulding for plagiocephaly.  Arch Dis Child. 2008;  93 809-810
• 7 Donegan HA, O’Flaherty DC, Kernohan WG. Towards computer assisted evaluation of plagiocephaly.  Med Inform (Lond). 1996;  21 155-167
• 8 Farkas LG. Accuracy of anthropometric measurements: past, present, and future.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;  33 10-18 discussion 19–22
• 9 Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. Second edn., New York: Raven Press; 1994
• 10 Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A. et al . Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;  103 327-337
• 11 Hammond P. The use of 3D face shape modelling in dysmorphology.  Arch Dis Child. 2007;  92 1120-1126
• 12 Hammond P, Hutton TJ, Allanson JE. et al . 3D analysis of facial morphology.  Am J Med Genet A. 2004;  126 339-348
• 13 Hood CA, Bock M, Hosey MT. et al . Facial asymmetry – 3D assessment of infants with cleft lip & palate.  Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003;  13 404-410
• 14 Hood CA, Hosey MT, Bock M. et al . Facial characterization of infants with cleft lip and palate using a 3-dimensional capture technique.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;  41 27-35
• 15 Hovis CL, Butler MG. Photoanthropometric study of craniofacial traits in individuals with Williams syndrome.  Clin Genet. 1997;  51 379-387
• 16 Hutchison BL, Hutchison LA, Thompson JM. et al . Quantification of plagiocephaly and brachycephaly in infants using a digital photographic technique.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;  42 539-547
• 17 Kelly KM, Littlefield TR, Pomatto JK. et al . Importance of early recognition and treatment of deformational plagiocephaly with orthotic cranioplasty.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;  36 127-130
• 18 Lee JY, Han Q, Trotman CA. 3-dimensional facial imaging: accuracy and considerations for clinical applications in orthodontics.  Angle Orthod. 2004;  74 587-593
• 19 Littlefield TR, Beals SP, Manwaring KH. et al . Treatment of craniofacial asymmetry with dynamic orthotic cranioplasty.  J Craniofac Surg. 1998;  9 11-17 discussion 18–19
• 20 Littlefield TR, Cherney JC, Luisi JN. et al . Comparison of plaster casting with 3-dimensional cranial imaging.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;  42 157-164
• 21 Littlefield TR, Kelly KM, Cherney JC. et al . Development of a new 3-dimensional cranial imaging system.  J Craniofac Surg. 2004;  15 175-181
• 22 Loveday BP, deChalain TB. Active counterpositioning or orthotic device to treat positional plagiocephaly?.  J Craniofac Surg. 2001;  12 308-313
• 23 Mortenson PA, Steinbok P. Quantifying positional plagiocephaly: reliability and validity of anthropometric measurements.  J Craniofac Surg. 2006;  17 413-419
• 24 Mulliken JB, Vander Woude DL, Hansen M. et al . Analysis of posterior plagiocephaly: deformational versus synostotic.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  103 371-380
• 25 Saeed NR, Wall SA, Dhariwal DK. Management of positional plagiocephaly.  Arch Dis Child. 2008;  93 82-84
• 26 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.  Psychol Bull. 1979;  86 420-428
• 27 Singh A, Wacogne I. What is the role of helmet therapy in positional plagiocephaly?.  Arch Dis Child. 2008;  93 807-809
• 28 Stellwagen L, Hubbard E, Chambers C. et al . Torticollis, facial asymmetry and plagiocephaly in normal newborns.  Arch Dis Child. 2008;  93 827-831
• 29 Teichgraeber JF, Ault JK, Baumgartner J. et al . Deformational posterior plagiocephaly: diagnosis and treatment.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;  39 582-586
• 30 van Vlimmeren LA, Takken T, van Adrichem LN. et al . Plagiocephalometry: a non-invasive method to quantify asymmetry of the skull; a reliability study.  Eur J Pediatr. 2006;  165 149-157
• 31 Weinberg SM, Naidoo S, Govier DP. et al . Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital 3-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.  J Craniofac Surg. 2006;  17 477-483
• 32 Xia JJ, Kennedy KA, Teichgraeber JF. et al . Nonsurgical treatment of deformational plagiocephaly: a systematic review.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;  162 719-727
• 33 Zhang X, Hans MG, Graham G. et al . Correlations between cephalometric and facial photographic measurements of craniofacial form.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;  131 67-71

Correspondence