Background and study aims: Endoscopic retrograde biliary biopsy samples are frequently too small and inadequate, which makes histological interpretation difficult. We therefore evaluated the diagnostic usefulness of forceps with a larger-sized cup and compared this with standard forceps for biliary biopsy.
Patients and methods: This prospective study included consecutive patients with extrahepatic biliary strictures who underwent retrograde biliary biopsy between March 2005 and March 2006 at the Toho University Ohashi Medical Center. The standard forceps used were 1.8-mm forceps (FB-39Q, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and the large-capacity forceps were 2.2-mm forceps (Radial jaw3, Boston Scientific Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA). Four randomized biopsy specimens were taken from each patient, two using each type of forceps.
Results: A total of 32 patients (30 with malignant biliary strictures and 2 with benign biliary strictures) were enrolled. The median size of the biopsy samples taken using the standard forceps was 0.68 mm2 and that using the large-capacity forceps was 1.98 mm2 (P < 0.0001). Significant differences between the standard forceps and large-capacity forceps were observed in sensitivity (43 % vs. 70 %), adequacy of the specimens, and submucosal tissue sampling rate.
Conclusions: Large-capacity forceps performed better than standard forceps in terms of size, adequacy of the sample, submucosal sampling rate, and detection of neoplasia.
References
1
Fouch P G, Kerr D M, Harlan J R. et al .
A prospective, controlled analysis of endoscopic cytotechniques for diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1991;
86
557-580
3
Kurzawinski T R, Deery A, Dooley J S. et al .
A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures.
Hepatology.
1993;
18
1399-1403
4
Glasbrenner B, Ardan M, Boeck W. et al .
Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Endoscopy.
1999;
31
712-717
6
Ponchon T, Gagnon P, Berger F. et al .
Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis: results of a prospective study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1995;
42
565-572
7
Howell D A, Beveridge R P, Bosco J. et al .
Endoscopic needle aspiration biopsy at ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary strictures.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1992;
38
531-535
9
Ferrari A P, Lichtenstein D R, Slivka A. et al .
Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1994;
40
140-145
12
Stewart C J, Mills P R, Carter R. et al .
Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases.
J Clin Pathol.
2001;
54
449-455
13
Fogel E L, de Bellis M, McHenry L. et al .
Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
71-77
14
Howell D A, Parsons W G, Jones M A. et al .
Complete tissue sampling of biliary strictures at ERCP using a new device.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1996;
43
498-502
15
Byrne M F, Gerke H, Mitchell R M. et al .
Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of bile duct lesions.
Endoscopy.
2004;
36
715-719
16
Kaufman D, Widlus D, Lazinger M. et al .
Diagnostic accuracy of simpson atherectomy catheter biopsy in detecting pancreaticobiliary malignancy.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2001;
96
1054-1058
17
Pugliese V, Barone D, Saccomanno S. et al .
Tissue sampling from the common bile duct through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic papillo(sphinctero)tomy and drainage in juxtapapillary malignancies.
Surg Endosc.
1987;
1
83-87
18
Rustgi A K, Kelsey P B, Guelrud M. et al .
Malignant tumors of the bile ducts: diagnosis by biopsy during endoscopic cannulation.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1989;
35
248-251
19
Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Wada N. et al .
Endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy without sphincterotomy for diagnosing biliary strictures: a prospective comparative study with bile and brush cytology.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1996;
91
465-467
20
Schoefl R, Haefner M, Wrba F. et al .
Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stenoses.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
1997;
32
363-368
21
Domagk D, Poremba C, Dietl K H. et al .
Endoscopic transpapillary biopsies and intraductal ultrasonography in the diagnostics of bile duct strictures: a prospective study.
Gut.
2002;
51
240-244
22
Pugliese V, Conio M, Nicolo G. et al .
Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1995;
42
520-526
23
De Bellis M, Sherman S, Fogel E L. et al .
Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 1).
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
56
552-561
24
De Bellis M, Sherman S, Fogel E L. et al .
Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 2).
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
56
720-730
25
Maetani I, Ikeda M, Tada T. et al .
Endoscopic retrograde biliary biopsy with larger forceps in extrahepatic biliary strictures.
Endoscopy.
2005;
37 Suppl 1
A279
26
Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J. et al .
Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1991;
37
383-393
27
Higashizawa T, Tamada K, Tomiyama T. et al .
Biliary guidewire facilitates bile duct biopsy and endoscopic drainage.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2002;
17
332-336
28
Danesh B J, Burke M, Newman J. et al .
Comparison of weight, depth, and diagnostic adequacy of specimens obtained with 16 different biopsy forceps designed for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Gut.
1985;
26
227-231
29
Ladas S D, Tsamouri M, Kouvidou C. et al .
Effect of forceps size and mode of orientation on endoscopic small bowel biopsy evaluation.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1994;
40
51-55
30
Bernstein D E, Barkin J S, Reiner D K. et al .
Standard biopsy forceps versus large-capacity forceps with and without needle.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1995;
41
573-576
