Background and study aims: Endoscopic retrograde biliary biopsy samples are frequently too small and inadequate,
which makes histological interpretation difficult. We therefore evaluated the diagnostic
usefulness of forceps with a larger-sized cup and compared this with standard forceps
for biliary biopsy.
Patients and methods: This prospective study included consecutive patients with extrahepatic biliary strictures
who underwent retrograde biliary biopsy between March 2005 and March 2006 at the Toho
University Ohashi Medical Center. The standard forceps used were 1.8-mm forceps (FB-39Q,
Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and the large-capacity forceps were 2.2-mm forceps (Radial
jaw3, Boston Scientific Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA). Four randomized biopsy
specimens were taken from each patient, two using each type of forceps.
Results: A total of 32 patients (30 with malignant biliary strictures and 2 with benign biliary
strictures) were enrolled. The median size of the biopsy samples taken using the standard
forceps was 0.68 mm2 and that using the large-capacity forceps was 1.98 mm2 (P < 0.0001). Significant differences between the standard forceps and large-capacity
forceps were observed in sensitivity (43 % vs. 70 %), adequacy of the specimens, and
submucosal tissue sampling rate.
Conclusions: Large-capacity forceps performed better than standard forceps in terms of size, adequacy
of the sample, submucosal sampling rate, and detection of neoplasia.
References
- 1
Fouch P G, Kerr D M, Harlan J R. et al .
A prospective, controlled analysis of endoscopic cytotechniques for diagnosis of malignant
biliary strictures.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1991;
86
557-580
- 2
Davidson B, Vasamidakis N, Dooley J S. et al .
Value of exfoliative cytology for investigating bile duct strictures.
Gut.
1992;
33
1408-1411
- 3
Kurzawinski T R, Deery A, Dooley J S. et al .
A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures.
Hepatology.
1993;
18
1399-1403
- 4
Glasbrenner B, Ardan M, Boeck W. et al .
Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde
cholangiopancreatography.
Endoscopy.
1999;
31
712-717
- 5
Fogel E L, Sherman S.
How to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.
Endoscopy.
1999;
31
758-760
- 6
Ponchon T, Gagnon P, Berger F. et al .
Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile
duct stenosis: results of a prospective study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1995;
42
565-572
- 7
Howell D A, Beveridge R P, Bosco J. et al .
Endoscopic needle aspiration biopsy at ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary strictures.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1992;
38
531-535
- 8
Kurzawinski T, Deery A, Davidson B R.
Diagnostic value of cytology for biliary stricture.
Br J Surg.
1993;
80
414-421
- 9
Ferrari A P, Lichtenstein D R, Slivka A. et al .
Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1994;
40
140-145
- 10
Jailwala J, Fogel E L, Sherman S. et al .
Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2000;
51
383-390
- 11
Macken E, Drijkoningen M, Van Aken E. et al .
Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
Acta Gastroenterol Belg.
2000;
63
254-259
- 12
Stewart C J, Mills P R, Carter R. et al .
Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406
cases.
J Clin Pathol.
2001;
54
449-455
- 13
Fogel E L, de Bellis M, McHenry L. et al .
Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary
obstruction: a prospective study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
71-77
- 14
Howell D A, Parsons W G, Jones M A. et al .
Complete tissue sampling of biliary strictures at ERCP using a new device.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1996;
43
498-502
- 15
Byrne M F, Gerke H, Mitchell R M. et al .
Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of bile duct lesions.
Endoscopy.
2004;
36
715-719
- 16
Kaufman D, Widlus D, Lazinger M. et al .
Diagnostic accuracy of simpson atherectomy catheter biopsy in detecting pancreaticobiliary
malignancy.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2001;
96
1054-1058
- 17
Pugliese V, Barone D, Saccomanno S. et al .
Tissue sampling from the common bile duct through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,
endoscopic papillo(sphinctero)tomy and drainage in juxtapapillary malignancies.
Surg Endosc.
1987;
1
83-87
- 18
Rustgi A K, Kelsey P B, Guelrud M. et al .
Malignant tumors of the bile ducts: diagnosis by biopsy during endoscopic cannulation.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1989;
35
248-251
- 19
Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Wada N. et al .
Endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy without sphincterotomy for diagnosing biliary
strictures: a prospective comparative study with bile and brush cytology.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1996;
91
465-467
- 20
Schoefl R, Haefner M, Wrba F. et al .
Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
for the diagnosis of biliary stenoses.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
1997;
32
363-368
- 21
Domagk D, Poremba C, Dietl K H. et al .
Endoscopic transpapillary biopsies and intraductal ultrasonography in the diagnostics
of bile duct strictures: a prospective study.
Gut.
2002;
51
240-244
- 22
Pugliese V, Conio M, Nicolo G. et al .
Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective
study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1995;
42
520-526
- 23
De Bellis M, Sherman S, Fogel E L. et al .
Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 1).
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
56
552-561
- 24
De Bellis M, Sherman S, Fogel E L. et al .
Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 2).
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
56
720-730
- 25
Maetani I, Ikeda M, Tada T. et al .
Endoscopic retrograde biliary biopsy with larger forceps in extrahepatic biliary strictures.
Endoscopy.
2005;
37 Suppl 1
A279
- 26
Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J. et al .
Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1991;
37
383-393
- 27
Higashizawa T, Tamada K, Tomiyama T. et al .
Biliary guidewire facilitates bile duct biopsy and endoscopic drainage.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2002;
17
332-336
- 28
Danesh B J, Burke M, Newman J. et al .
Comparison of weight, depth, and diagnostic adequacy of specimens obtained with 16
different biopsy forceps designed for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Gut.
1985;
26
227-231
- 29
Ladas S D, Tsamouri M, Kouvidou C. et al .
Effect of forceps size and mode of orientation on endoscopic small bowel biopsy evaluation.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1994;
40
51-55
- 30
Bernstein D E, Barkin J S, Reiner D K. et al .
Standard biopsy forceps versus large-capacity forceps with and without needle.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1995;
41
573-576
M. IkedaMD
Division of Gastroenterology
Department of Internal Medicine
Toho University Ohashi Medical Center
2-17-6 Ohashi Meguro-ku
Tokyo 153-8515
Japan
Fax: +81-3-34681269
eMail: masaki@seirei-numazu.com