Background and study aims: The impact of the diagnosis and treatment of dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus on quality of life (QoL) is poorly understood. This study assessed the influence of dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus on QoL and evaluated whether endoscopic treatment of dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) improves QoL.
Patients and methods: We analyzed changes in QoL in the AIM Dysplasia Trial, a multicenter study of patients with dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus who were randomly allocated to RFA therapy or a sham intervention. We developed a 10-item questionnaire to assess the influence of dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus on QoL. The questionnaire was completed by patients at baseline and 12 months.
Results: 127 patients were randomized to RFA (n = 84) or sham (n = 43). At baseline, most patients reported worry about esophageal cancer (71 % RFA, 85 % sham) and esophagectomy (61 % RFA, 68 % sham). Patients also reported depression, impaired QoL, worry, stress, and dissatisfaction with the condition of their esophagus. Of those randomized, 117 patients completed the study to the 12-month end point. Compared with the sham group, patients treated with RFA had significantly less worry about esophageal cancer (P = 0.003) and esophagectomy (P = 0.009). They also had significantly reduced depression (P = 0.02), general worry about the condition of their esophagus (P ≤ 0.001), impact on daily QoL (P = 0.009), stress (P = 0.03), dissatisfaction with the condition of their esophagus (P ≤ 0.001), and impact on work and family life (P = 0.02).
Conclusions: Inclusion in the treatment group of this randomized, sham-controlled trial of RFA was associated with improvement in disease-specific health-related quality of life. This improvement appears secondary to a perceived decrease in the risk of cancer.
References
1
Spechler S J.
Clinical practice. Barrett’s esophagus.
N Engl J Med.
2002;
346
836-842
2
Sharma P, Falk G W, Weston A P. et al .
Dysplasia and cancer in a large multicenter cohort of patients with Barrett’s esophagus.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2006;
4
566-572
3
Overholt B F, Lightdale C J, Wang K K. et al .
Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium for ablation of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: international, partially blinded, randomized phase III trial.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
62
488-498
4
Reid B J, Levine D S, Longton G. et al .
Predictors of progression to cancer in Barrett’s esophagus: baseline histology and flow cytometry identify low- and high-risk patient subsets.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2000;
95
1669-1676
5
Rastogi A, Puli S, El-Serag H B. et al .
Incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and high-grade dysplasia: a meta-analysis.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
394-398
6
Eloubeidi M A, Mason A C, Desmond R A, El-Serag H B.
Temporal trends (1973 – 11997) in survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma in the United States: a glimmer of hope?.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2003;
98
1627-1633
7 Wenger N, Furberg , CD . Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. New York; Raven Press 1990
8
Crockett S D, Lippmann Q K, Dellon E S, Shaheen N J.
Health-related quality of life in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2009;
7
613-623
9
Shaheen N J, Dulai G S, Ascher B. et al .
Effect of a new diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus on insurance status.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2005;
100
577-580
10
Birkmeyer J D, Stukel T A, Siewers A E. et al .
Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.
N Engl J Med.
2003;
349
2117-2127
11
Moraca R J, Low D E.
Outcomes and health-related quality of life after esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal cancer.
Arch Surg.
2006;
141
545-549; discussion 549 – 551
12
Chang L C, Oelschlager B K, Quiroga E. et al .
Long-term outcome of esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia or cancer found during surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus.
J Gastrointest Surg.
2006;
10
341-346
13
Headrick J R, Nichols 3rd F C, Miller D L. et al .
High-grade esophageal dysplasia: long-term survival and quality of life after esophagectomy.
Ann Thorac Surg.
2002;
73
1697-1702; discussion 1702 – 1693
14
Shaheen N J, Sharma P, Overholt B F. et al .
Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia.
N Engl J Med.
2009;
360
2277-2288
15
Cherepanov D, Palta M, Fryback D G, Robert S A.
Gender differences in health-related quality-of-life are partly explained by sociodemographic and socioeconomic variation between adult men and women in the US: evidence from four US nationally representative data sets.
Qual Life Res.
2010;
[Epub ahead of print]
16
Kaplan G A, Camacho T.
Perceived health and mortality: a nine-year follow-up of the human population laboratory cohort.
Am J Epidemiol.
1983;
117
292-304
17
Schembre D, Arai A, Levy S. et al .
Quality of life after esophagectomy and endoscopic therapy for Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia.
Dis Esophagus.
2010;
23
458-464
18
Patrick D L, Deyo R A.
Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.
Med Care.
1989;
27
S217-S232
19
McSweeny A J, Creer T L.
Health-related quality-of-life assessment in medical care.
Dis Mon.
1995;
41
1-71
1 See Appendix 1.
2 All institutions and locations are in the US.
N. J. ShaheenMD, MPH
University of North Carolina School of Medicine
CB#7080 Chapel Hill, NC 27599–7080
Fax: +1-919-843-2508
Email: nshaheen@med.unc.edu