Endoscopy 2010; 42(12): 1118
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255918
Letters to the editor

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Reply to the letter by Coriat et al.

F.  Onogi, H.  Araki, H.  Moriwaki
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
30. November 2010 (online)

Preview

We sincerely thank Dr Coriat and colleagues for their comments on our article entitled “Transmural air leak”: a computed tomographic finding following endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumors [1].

Despite the promising application of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors, a substantial risk of procedure-related perforation has been reported due to the thin wall and sparse muscle layer in this part of the gastrointestinal tract. Actually, the perforation rate ranges from 2.2 % to 8.2 % in colorectal ESD [2] [3] [4] [5].

Coriat et al. stated that transmural air leak was observed in their patients undergoing rectal ESD. We also noted transmural air leak (pneumoretroperitoneum and pneumoperitoneum) by abdominal computed tomography (CT) after colorectal ESD in 39 of 196 consecutive patients (19.9 %) [6], giving a similar incidence to that in gastric ESD (13 %) [1]. The transmural air leak was observed in patients in whom the procedure time was longer, but abdominal pain or symptoms of peritonitis were not observed, except for a higher incidence of pyrexia above 37.5 ° C. The patients with pyrexia were treated with antibiotics and all of them recovered following this conservative treatment.

Thus, we agree with Coriat et al. that it is less necessary to systematically perform CT scans in patients without clinical symptoms after gastric or colorectal ESD. In patients with pyrexia, CT would help to distinguish transmural air leak from other complications that possibly require urgent intervention.

Competing interests: None

References

F. OnogiMD 

Department of Gastroenterology
Gifu University Hospital

1-1 Yanagido Gifu
Gifu 501-1194
Japan

Fax: +81-58-2306310

eMail: onogi-gif@umin.ac.jp