Endoscopy 2011; 43(2): 116-122
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255954
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Pilot study of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy during colonoscopic surveillance of patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis

F.  J.  C.  van den Broek1 , J.  A.  van Es1 , S.  van Eeden2 , P.  C.  F.  Stokkers1 , C.  Y.  Ponsioen1 , J.  B.  Reitsma3 , P.  Fockens1 , E.  Dekker1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • 2Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • 3Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 3 May 2010

accepted after revision 15 September 2010

Publikationsdatum:
16. Dezember 2010 (online)

Background and aims: Surveillance of patients with ulcerative colitis consists of taking targeted and random biopsies, which is time-consuming and of doubtful efficiency. The use of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) may increase efficiency. This prospective pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of pCLE in ulcerative colitis surveillance.

Methods: In 22 patients with ulcerative colitis, 48 visible lesions and 87 random areas were initially evaluated by real-time narrow-band imaging (NBI) and high-definition endoscopy (HDE). Before taking biopsies, fluorescein-enhanced pCLE was performed. All pCLE videos were scored afterwards by two endoscopists who were blinded to histology and endoscopy. Outcome measures were: (1) the feasibility of pCLE, expressed as pCLE imaging time required, percentage of imaging time with clear pCLE histology, and pCLE video quality as rated by two endoscopists; and (2) the diagnostic accuracy of pCLE.

Results: The median pCLE imaging time required was 98 seconds for lesions vs. 66 seconds for random areas (P = 0.002). The median percentages of imaging time with clear pCLE histology were 61 % vs. 81 % respectively (P < 0.001). The pCLE video quality was rated as good/excellent in 69 %. Feasibility was significantly poorer for sessile and pedunculated mobile lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of blinded pCLE were 65 %, 82 %, and 81 %, whereas these figures were 100 %, 89 %, and 92 % for real-time endoscopic diagnosis with NBI and HDE.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that pCLE for ulcerative colitis surveillance is feasible with reasonable diagnostic accuracy. Future research should show whether increased experience with pCLE improves its ease of use and whether real-time pCLE diagnosis is associated with greater diagnostic accuracy.

References

  • 1 Eaden J A, Mayberry J F. Guidelines for screening and surveillance of asymptomatic colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.  Gut. 2002;  51 (Suppl 5) V10-V12
  • 2 Itzkowitz S H, Present D H. Consensus conference: Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease.  Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;  11 314-321
  • 3 Collins P, Mpofu C, Watson A, Rhodes J. Strategies for detecting colon cancer and/or dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;  CD000279
  • 4 Rubin P H, Friedman S, Harpaz N et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy in chronic colitis: conservative management after endoscopic resection of dysplastic polyps.  Gastroenterology. 1999;  117 1295-1300
  • 5 Odze R D, Farraye F A, Hecht J L, Hornick J L. Long-term follow-up after polypectomy treatment for adenoma-like dysplastic lesions in ulcerative colitis.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 534-541
  • 6 Hurlstone D P, Sanders D S, Atkinson R et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for flat neoplasia in chronic ulcerative colitis: can we change the endoscopic management paradigm?.  Gut. 2007;  56 838-846
  • 7 van den Broek F J, Fockens P, Dekker E. Review article: New developments in colonic imaging.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;  26 (Suppl 2) 91-99
  • 8 Kiesslich R, Fritsch J, Holtmann M et al. Methylene blue-aided chromoendoscopy for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and colon cancer in ulcerative colitis.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  124 880-888
  • 9 Dekker E, van den Broek F J, Reitsma J B et al. Narrow-band imaging compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 216-221
  • 10 van den Broek F J, Fockens P, van Eeden S et al. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for surveillance in ulcerative colitis: randomized comparison of high resolution endoscopy and autofluorescence imaging for neoplasia detection; and evaluation of narrow band imaging for classification of lesions.  Gut. 2008;  57 1083-1089
  • 11 van den Broek F J, Reitsma J B, Curvers W L et al. Systematic review of narrow-band imaging for the detection and differentiation of neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions in the colon (with videos).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 124-135
  • 12 Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M, Gnaendiger J et al. Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127 706-713
  • 13 Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Lammersdorf K et al. Chromoscopy-guided endomicroscopy increases the diagnostic yield of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  132 874-882
  • 14 Hurlstone D P, Thomson M, Brown S et al. Confocal endomicroscopy in ulcerative colitis: differentiating dysplasia-associated lesional mass and adenoma-like mass.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  5 1235-1241
  • 15 Polglase A L, McLaren W J, Delaney P M. Pentax confocal endomicroscope: a novel imaging device for in vivo histology of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract.  Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006;  3 549-556
  • 16 Meining A, Saur D, Bajbouj M et al. In vivo histopathology for detection of gastrointestinal neoplasia with a portable, confocal miniprobe: an examiner blinded analysis.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  5 1261-1267
  • 17 Lipson B K, Yannuzzi L A. Complications of intravenous fluorescein injections.  Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1989;  29 200-205
  • 18 Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M et al. Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127 706-713
  • 19 Endoscopic Classification Review Group . Update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 570-578
  • 20 Kudo S, Rubio C A, Teixeira C R et al. Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 367-373
  • 21 East J E, Suzuki N, Saunders B P. Comparison of magnified pit pattern interpretation with narrow band imaging versus chromoendoscopy for diminutive colonic polyps: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 310-316
  • 22 Schlemper R J, Riddell R H, Kato Y et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.  Gut. 2000;  47 251-255
  • 23 van den Broek F JC, Meining A, Wallace M B et al. Accuracy and interobserver agreement of international experts on a new classification scheme for probe-based confocal fluorescence microscopy.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 A202
  • 24 Landis J R, Koch G G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.  Biometrics. 1977;  33 159-174
  • 25 Bossuyt P M, Reitsma J B, Bruns D E et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.  BMJ. 2003;  326 41-44
  • 26 Hurlstone D P, Baraza W, Brown S et al. In vivo real-time confocal laser scanning endomicroscopic colonoscopy for the detection and characterization of colorectal neoplasia.  Br J Surg. 2008;  95 636-645

E. DekkerMD, PhD 

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Academic Medical Center

Meibergdreef 9
1105 AZ, Amsterdam
The Netherlands

Fax: +31-20-6917033

eMail: e.dekker@amc.uva.nl