Endoscopy 2011; 43(2): 108-115
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255956
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Narrow-band imaging versus high-definition endoscopy for the diagnosis of neoplasia in ulcerative colitis

F.  J.  C.  van den Broek1 , P.  Fockens1 , S.  van Eeden2 , P.  C.  F.  Stokkers1 , C.  Y.  Ponsioen1 , J.  B.  Reitsma3 , E.  Dekker1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • 2Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • 3Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 17 May 2010

accepted after revision 15 September 2010

Publikationsdatum:
16. Dezember 2010 (online)

Background and study aims: Controversy exists about which colonoscopic technique is most sensitive for the diagnosis of neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis. We compared new-generation narrow-band imaging (NBI) to high-definition endoscopy (HDE) for the detection of neoplasia and evaluated NBI for the differentiation of neoplastic from non-neoplastic mucosa.

Patients and methods: Randomized crossover trial in which patients with ulcerative colitis underwent both NBI and HDE colonoscopy in random order with at least 3 weeks between the two procedures, which were performed by different endoscopists. Lesions detected during the first examination were left in situ in order to enable detection during the second examination as well. Main outcome measures were (1) neoplasia detection, and (2) diagnostic accuracy of NBI for differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic mucosa by using the Kudo classification and vascular pattern intensity (VPI).

Results: Twenty-five patients were randomized to undergo HDE first and 23 to undergo NBI first. Of 16 neoplastic lesions, 11 (69 %) were detected by HDE and 13 (81 %) by NBI (P = 0.727). Of 11 patients with neoplasia, 9 (82 %) were diagnosed by HDE and 8 (73 %) by NBI (P = 1.0). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the Kudo classification were 76 %, 66 % and 67 %. Corresponding figures for VPI were 80 %, 72 %, and 73 %.

Conclusion: NBI does not improve the detection of neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis compared to HDE. In addition, NBI proves unsatisfactory for differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic mucosa.

References

  • 1 Eaden J A, Abrams K R, Mayberry J F. The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis.  Gut. 2001;  48 526-535
  • 2 Rutter M D, Saunders B P, Wilkinson K H et al. Thirty-year analysis of a colonoscopic surveillance program for neoplasia in ulcerative colitis.  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 1030-1038
  • 3 Collins P, Mpofu C, Watson A, Rhodes J. Strategies for detecting colon cancer and/or dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;  CD000279
  • 4 Rutter M, Bernstein C, Matsumoto T et al. Endoscopic appearance of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis and the role of staining.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 1109-1114
  • 5 Rubin D T, Rothe J A, Hetzel J T et al. Are dysplasia and colorectal cancer endoscopically visible in patients with ulcerative colitis?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 998-1004
  • 6 Eaden J A, Mayberry J F. Guidelines for screening and surveillance of asymptomatic colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.  Gut. 2002;  51 (Suppl 5) V10-V12
  • 7 Itzkowitz S H, Present D H. Consensus conference: Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease.  Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;  11 314-321
  • 8 Dekker E, Fockens P. New imaging techniques at colonoscopy: tissue spectroscopy and narrow band imaging.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005;  15 703-714
  • 9 Kiesslich R, Fritsch J, Holtmann M et al. Methylene blue-aided chromoendoscopy for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and colon cancer in ulcerative colitis.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  124 880-888
  • 10 Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Lammersdorf K et al. Chromoscopy-guided endomicroscopy increases the diagnostic yield of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  132 874-882
  • 11 Rutter M D, Saunders B P, Schofield G et al. Pancolonic indigo carmine dye spraying for the detection of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis.  Gut. 2004;  53 256-260
  • 12 Hurlstone D P, Sanders D S, Lobo A J et al. Indigo carmine-assisted high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy for the detection and characterisation of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis: a prospective evaluation.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 1186-1192
  • 13 Marion J F, Waye J D, Present D H et al. Chromoendoscopy-targeted biopsies are superior to standard colonoscopic surveillance for detecting dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a prospective endoscopic trial.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;  103 2342-2349
  • 14 Gono K, Obi T, Yamaguchi M et al. Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging.  J Biomed Opt. 2004;  9 568-577
  • 15 Kuznetsov K, Lambert R, Rey J F. Narrow-band imaging: potential and limitations.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 76-81
  • 16 Gheorghe C. Narrow-band imaging endoscopy for diagnosis of malignant and premalignant gastrointestinal lesions.  J Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2006;  15 77-82
  • 17 Dekker E, van den Broek F J, Reitsma J B et al. Narrow-band imaging compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 216-221
  • 18 Lichtiger S, Present D H, Kornbluth A et al. Cyclosporine in severe ulcerative colitis refractory to steroid therapy.  N Engl J Med. 1994;  330 1841-1845
  • 19 Schlemper R J, Hirata I, Dixon M F. The macroscopic classification of early neoplasia of the digestive tract.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 163-168
  • 20 Kudo S, Rubio C A, Teixeira C R et al. Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 367-373
  • 21 East J E, Suzuki N, Saunders B P. Comparison of magnified pit pattern interpretation with narrow band imaging versus chromoendoscopy for diminutive colonic polyps: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 310-316
  • 22 Schlemper R J, Riddell R H, Kato Y et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.  Gut. 2000;  47 251-255
  • 23 Torlakovic E E, Gomez J D, Driman D K et al. Sessile serrated adenoma (SSA) vs. traditional serrated adenoma (TSA).  Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;  32 21-29
  • 24 Bossuyt P M, Reitsma J B, Bruns D E et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.  BMJ. 2003;  326 41-44
  • 25 Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y et al. Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 1094-1098
  • 26 Srivastava A, Redston M, Farraye F A et al. Hyperplastic/serrated polyposis in inflammatory bowel disease: a case series of a previously undescribed entity.  Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;  32 296-303
  • 27 Rex D K, Helbig C C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  133 42-47
  • 28 Aschenbeck J, Adler A, Yenerim T et al. Narrow-band versus white-light HDTV endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial.  Gastroenterology. 2009;  136 (2) 410-416
  • 29 van den Broek F J, Fockens P, van Eeden S et al. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for surveillance in ulcerative colitis: randomized comparison of high resolution endoscopy and autofluorescence imaging for neoplasia detection; and evaluation of narrow band imaging for classification of lesions.  Gut. 2008;  57 1083-1089
  • 30 Matsumoto T, Kudo T, Jo Y et al. Magnifying colonoscopy with narrow band imaging system for the diagnosis of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 957-965
  • 31 van den Broek F J, van Soest E J, Naber A H et al. Combining autofluorescence imaging and narrow-band imaging for the differentiation of adenomas from non-neoplastic colonic polyps among experienced and non-experienced endoscopists.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;  104 1498-1507
  • 32 Pohl J, Lotterer E, Balzer C et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial.  Gut. 2009;  58 73-78
  • 33 Hoffman A, Kagel C, Goetz M et al. Recognition and characterization of small colonic neoplasia with high-definition colonoscopy using i-Scan is as precise as chromoendoscopy.  Dig Liver Dis. 2010;  42 45-50
  • 34 Hurlstone D P, Sanders D S, Atkinson R et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for flat neoplasia in chronic ulcerative colitis: can we change the endoscopic management paradigm?.  Gut. 2007;  56 838-846
  • 35 Rutter M D, Saunders B P, Wilkinson K H et al. Cancer surveillance in longstanding ulcerative colitis: endoscopic appearances help predict cancer risk.  Gut. 2004;  53 1813-1816
  • 36 Cairns S R, Scholefield J H, Steele R J et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002).  Gut. 2010;  59 666-689

E. DekkerMD, PhD 

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Academic Medical Centre
University of Amsterdam

Meibergdreef 9
1105 AZ, Amsterdam
The Netherlands

Fax: +31-20-6917033

eMail: e.dekker@amc.uva.nl